Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-30-2009, 10:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,236
Do I need a new fuel pressure regulator?

While working on my car this weekend, I broke the brittle vacuum line going to the fuel pressure regulator.

When I fit a new hose in there, I decided to suck on it to see if it was sealing well. It wasn't. Depending on how I wiggled the nipple, it would intermittently leak air. Here's the lame part. I tasted fuel vapor.

Is a small amount of fuel vapor here normal, or is my diaphragm going south? Also, can I just replace the rubber nipple or do I need a whole new regulator?

1990 300SE (M103)


Thanks!!

__________________
-tp


1990 300SE "Corinne"- 145k daily driver - street modified differential - PARTING OUT OR SELLING SOON - PORTLAND OR. AREA - PM ME FOR DETAILS
1988 560SEL "Gunther"- 190K passes anything except a gas station
1997 S420 - 265k just bought it with a rebuilt trans. Lovely condition
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-31-2009, 02:48 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Melbourne Australia
Posts: 844
That vacuum line coming from the fuel regulator is not a vacuum line per se. That line goes to the hose that extends from the valve cover gasket to the air cleaner.
The purpose of that tube is to overflow fuel to the air intake in case the regulator diaphragm goes faulty. (Fire preventative.)

I don't know if sucking on that tube would have been such a good idea.

If the diaphragm has had it you need a new regulator. (New one $$$)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-31-2009, 05:42 AM
hey_allen's Avatar
greasy fingered tinkerer
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 728
Huh. I would have thought that a "pressure" nipple on a pressure regulator would be to manifold pressure reference the fuel pressure, adjusting for engine load.

Many makes do that, but MB is often different, just for the sake of doing it differently!
__________________
-Josh
Testing the cheap Mercedes axiom, one bolt at a time...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-31-2009, 06:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Southeastern PA
Posts: 3,077
tp, from my experience there is no way to replace the rubber vent line on a fuel pressure regulator, and the plastic vent line will not fit into the remaining stub. A new Bosch FPR is around $375 online.
__________________
Fred Hoelzle
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-31-2009, 09:29 AM
syljua's Avatar
C140 CL500
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Norway
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivanerrol View Post
That vacuum line coming from the fuel regulator is not a vacuum line per se. That line goes to the hose that extends from the valve cover gasket to the air cleaner.
The purpose of that tube is to overflow fuel to the air intake in case the regulator diaphragm goes faulty. (Fire preventative.)
The line is there to regulate the fuel pressure in the rail
so that the pressure is at a constant level above pressure in the intake
(so that a set opening time of the injector will give the same
amount of fuel regardless of intake pressure). If the diaphragm goes
south, yes the fuel will be drawn to the intake, but thats secondary.

I made a video on checking the FPR last summer;
http://www.pvv.org/~syljua/merc/FuelPressureME.mov

This is for a M119, and I see now, that maybe the M103 FPR functions
differently?

br,
syljua
__________________
1998 CL500 W140
1984 230E W123
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2009, 06:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,236
I think it probably does act differently. By the way, nice video.

For one thing, the M103 is using CIS, not electronic injection. For another, the vacuum line goes to the breather hose between the valve cover and the air filter housing. As such, it doesn't get a signal that is representative of manifold pressure.

Ivanerrol said "I don't know if sucking on that tube would have been such a good idea."

I didn't suck very hard, just enough to see if there was a seal or not. There wasn't. It's not like I put a mityvac on it and sucked it down to nothing.


Upon examining it further, it seems like the rubber nipple is no longer sealing to the metal housing. It appears to pop in there much like a tire valve stem. I wonder if I can seal it up with some RTV or some other goop. Perhaps even rubber cement would work, or glue from a tire patch kit. At $400, it's worth a shot!
__________________
-tp


1990 300SE "Corinne"- 145k daily driver - street modified differential - PARTING OUT OR SELLING SOON - PORTLAND OR. AREA - PM ME FOR DETAILS
1988 560SEL "Gunther"- 190K passes anything except a gas station
1997 S420 - 265k just bought it with a rebuilt trans. Lovely condition
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-01-2009, 08:02 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
When I was working on our 300E a few months back I damaged that rubber nipple thing too....I just jammed it back in the hole as best I could.....seems to be fine....although it'd probably drool fuel if the diaphragm fails....but I have a whole spare fuel pressure regulator....with an intact rubber piece....so I should be ok.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-01-2009, 08:18 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by syljua View Post
The line is there to regulate the fuel pressure in the rail
so that the pressure is at a constant level above pressure in the intake
(so that a set opening time of the injector will give the same
amount of fuel regardless of intake pressure). If the diaphragm goes
south, yes the fuel will be drawn to the intake, but thats secondary.

I made a video on checking the FPR last summer;
http://www.pvv.org/~syljua/merc/FuelPressureME.mov

This is for a M119, and I see now, that maybe the M103 FPR functions
differently?

br,
syljua
What a beautiful video! I felt love and emotion for that engine! The power of music.....wshew.

Well done.

__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page