Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-05-2010, 08:51 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: BALTIMORE
Posts: 166
Wink Questions ? 89 300 se and engine transplant possibilities

Gentlemen
I recently purchased a rather nice 1987 420 sel PARTS CAR
it has documentation on the timing chain / head /seals and other maintenance performed , to the tune of $2700 in Feb of this year. I picked the car up in State College Pa and drove it home to Baltimore 135miles - No issues , really a nice car .

( seems a shame to part it out- but the price- low enough and I need some items for my 89 300 se)

A couple of questions;
1. The differential ratio on my 89 300se is the 3.46 the 420 sel has the 2.47
assuming they are interchangeable -
WOULD IT BE FEASIBLE TO SWITCH THE DIFFERENTIAL?
Might I realize better fuel economy at highway speeds?
or would the 6 cyl not perform properly ( not certain of optimum rpm range )
would my start up be horrendously slow /tedious ? ( 240 D like ?)
Currently I realize 19/20 mpg highway cruising and was curious if the 2.47 ratio might get me to 24 +- mpg at 70 mph cruising speed?

2. Is this 420sel drive train( 4.2 l v-8) suitable for a transplant ?
such as the '73 280 in EVOLDEAL'S THREAD ?
my '73 280 pronounced dead D:

or a locally owned '72 300 sel ? in need of new engine/ transmission

Thanks in advance for any input.

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-05-2010, 04:32 PM
Gilly's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Evansville WI
Posts: 9,616
If you are willing to accept a decrease in off the line performance, everything to me looks like it would work OK. I don't think the decrease would be that dramatic, but noticeable. I would think your fuel mileage estimate would also be in the ballpark, a few more mpg.
Gilly
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-05-2010, 10:22 PM
cth350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,840
The alloy V8 would drop into the older S class cars you mention. There would be a bit of a problem with the air suspension compressor and it's oil supply for the 300sel. But it would be a heck of a nice project. -CTH
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-06-2010, 12:58 AM
home of 4,5,6,8 cylinders
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 504
what kind of mileage u get on the 420? I heard of sometimes bigger engine burn less fuel.

I had a 300se before, the engine seems to rev a lot too. becareful to drop the 2.47 into the 300se, u could be loading/lugging the trans too much as u dont have to spin as fast.
I do have a 420 now, is much quieter , nicer, only draw back is going thru gas like no tomorrow. I also have a 190e 2.3 dont think is all that frugal on gas either.
The 300sd is the cheapest to run. As I use the combo oil.
I u really want to save gas, go get a diesel and burn atf /veggie oil.

Funny the modern day 560 v8 put out as much power as the old 6.3 v8 ( 250 HP approx )
and on my bro's 98 e320 it puts out 215 HP is as much as my 420 now!

the newer 500 puts out 322HP with 4 valves, newer ones is little less no a big difference.

V 12 were 389 HP, and a new sl 55 is almost that nowadays.

__________________
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2018 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page