PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Tech Help (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/tech-help/)
-   -   M103 heads (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/tech-help/296714-m103-heads.html)

gschira 04-02-2011 01:01 PM

M103 heads
 
Just curios--Does anyone have pics of the two different heads and piston tops? Also, what is a squish pad? Would be helpful if it were pointed out in a picture.
Could one of those oddball assemblies be a 2.6 head on a 3.0 engine? I mean I have the bigger bore block but maybe the oddball head. I thought I had an original build '88 300 SE, but after reading posts on this forum (M103 2.6 and 3.0L head differences?) I am beginning to wonder. Could someone clear this up for me. It ran great until a cam bearing/tower stripped out of head.
Thanks and have a great weekend.............

JohnM. 04-02-2011 04:05 PM

The 86-89 M103 engines had issues with cam/rocker hardness and also the towers stripping out which is consistent with the model year of your car. So your head is most likely original. It doesn't make sense to swap heads on these cars because they can be fully rebuilt very easily...unless it's warped extremely badly which is rare.

Squish pad, quench, piston/head clearance, is the area between the flat part of top of the piston and the flat part of the block (combustion chamber). You have no reason to worry about it.

The only thing that changed on M103 heads was the style (shape) of the combustion chamber which should not have any affect on the squish area. But it did change compression *slightly*. I can't find pictures of a early vs late head, but it doesn't really matter. Have your original head rebuilt at a competent machine shop and you'll be back on the road.

gschira 04-03-2011 09:30 AM

Thanks John, but what does this quote by duxthe1 mean---"Yes the head will bolt but the 2.6 head has a squish pad and the 3.0 is an open hemispherical chamber. So a 3.0 head on a 2.6 would have a lot less compression. FWIW, there may be a few oddball assemblies out there but AFIK... no dice."
My head does not have a totally open hemispherical chamber.
Should there be clearance indents for valves on piston tops for 3.0 pistons? Pics would sure be nice. Anyone got pics? I will post some soon...........

gschira 04-03-2011 11:03 PM

M103 heads
 
1 Attachment(s)
Ok, which head is this ---2.6 or 3.0 ???

JohnM. 04-03-2011 11:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by gschira (Post 2692324)
Ok, which head is this ---2.6 or 3.0 ???

Both :D


EDIT - I switched them sorry.

That is actually a early head with the heart shaped chamber (86-89). So both a early 190E and early 300E use that head.

The late heads had a hemispherical shaped chamber. (90-92)

gschira 04-04-2011 08:50 PM

Thanks John M for clearing that up for me.........

RdSnake 07-08-2011 12:26 AM

What was Mercedes' reason for changing the combustion chamber design?
Did they also change compression ratio between the 2 designs?

Dr. Sternschnuppe 05-01-2014 03:29 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by RdSnake (Post 2748514)
Did they also change compression ratio between the 2 designs?

No, they didn't change CR. :)

Ivanerrol 05-04-2014 07:54 PM

M.B. changed the metallurgy of the head components due to premature wear problems.
Around 1989.
If you are going to rebuild the head then the newer compound materials will be in the new moving and bearing components.

This was also the era when unleaded fuel and catalytic converters were slowly being introduced worldwide so this "may" have an had an impact on the design of the combustion chambers.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:05 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website