PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Tech Help (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/tech-help/)
-   -   Forever transmission fluid (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/tech-help/329376-forever-transmission-fluid.html)

Arminius 11-07-2012 05:41 PM

Forever transmission fluid
 
Was it the sulphur in the transmision fluid of my 1999 ML320 that allowed Daimler to recommend against changing it ever? There are 211,000 miles on my truck and I decided to change the fluid before taking a long trip in order to examine it, the pan, the filter, and the magnet for debris suggestive of failure; luckily, there were none. What I did find was black fluid the consistency of molasses which stunk of sulphur and left a yellowish stain on my jeans. I think it was hypoid gear oil like what I used to put into differentials and boat gear cases. The expensive replacement fluid has the appearance of brake fluid without the sulphur. Apparently Daimler now recommends frequent fluid changes. Was Daimler forced to discontinue use of sulphur for environmental reasons or did they go to the lower viscosity for MPG considerations? I liked the idea of forever fluid and wonder what has changed. Daimler gets more money this way and I heard that when the new parts boss came in about 10 years ago, the first thing he did was double parts prices to corporate acclaim. They are a sinister, sulphurous bunch!

oldsinner111 11-07-2012 06:20 PM

is your transmission a manual then it would be gear oil.If automatic the clutch have graphite in them and cause the black,nothing to worry.Tramission should fluid should be change every 40,000 miles.I use Mobil One ATF and change every 80,000 miles.

compress ignite 11-07-2012 07:48 PM

There is NO such Thing...
 
As "Forever" ATF.(Except in the mind of the Deceived Owner!)
Most Likely some Madison Avenue Type working for Montvale or Stuttgart
came up with THE RIDICULOUS claim as part of some sales Smutz.

MB has backpedaled away from that Bushwa claim as fast as they can,
and at the same time managed to try to appear as if they NEVER Said it.

TOO,TOO Many Trannys went KaBoom as a result of this Excrement!

jcyuhn 11-08-2012 12:10 PM

Not sure how or why it would smell of sulfur. I've heard the special ATF is much like Dexron, though the additive package differs.

The black is normal. The clutches in the transmission include graphite, and the fluid picks it up over time as the clutches wear. Inky black is not a problem, though it does indicate the trans has not been serviced for many miles.

The filled-for-life thing was an MBUSA policy. The Rest-of-the-World always had a 40K-ish mile service interval for this transmission.

oldirty88 11-08-2012 01:51 PM

My 99 c280 with the m112 has the tranny dipstick /filler tube sealed. How were you able to add the fluid?

tjts1 11-08-2012 02:03 PM

A lot of european manufacturers went to 'lifetime fluids' in the 90s so they could claim lower ownership costs over the life of the car. Its BS. My 94 Volvo had lifetime diff oil, ATF and coolant. Replaced all 3 more than once.

Gilly 11-08-2012 04:58 PM

I would maintain that the transmissions went boom "just because". There is no way to prove whether a transmission would fail if the fluid were changed or not. Transmissions sometimes fail, through no fault of the fluid.

Arminius 11-08-2012 05:19 PM

factory experiment
 
Sulphur has long been a additive for oil to be used in gears experiencing high pressure and sliding contact such as hypoid sets. Daimler doesn't do anything without cause. I wonder if high sulphur transmission fluid in conjunction with an instruction to purchasers to never change it may have been a factory experiment. I use my tranny fairly hard with gutted converters and extra intake air. Also, I go down through the gears at stoplights as on my motorcycle. I don't tow over the Pass as my last Tahoe went out at 120,000 miles despite the addition of a separate fluid cooler. This was good fluid for me. Factories do experiment like Harley did with OHC drive belts instead of chains (now the norm). If this were an experiment, there are other reasons besides non-functionality which could have caused its discontinuance: EG, reduced profits to dealers for service, the Euro eco-nannies or MPG. Just another one of life's mysteries. I'd prefer not to change every 40k.

Arminius 11-08-2012 05:21 PM

I'll do a separate thread under "Change ML320 transmission fluid" as there is a lot of misinformation out there.

ROGER E. 11-13-2012 12:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arminius (Post 3044843)
Was it the sulphur in the transmision fluid of my 1999 ML320 that allowed Daimler to recommend against changing it ever? There are 211,000 miles on my truck and I decided to change the fluid before taking a long trip in order to examine it, the pan, the filter, and the magnet for debris suggestive of failure; luckily, there were none. What I did find was black fluid the consistency of molasses which stunk of sulphur and left a yellowish stain on my jeans. I think it was hypoid gear oil like what I used to put into differentials and boat gear cases. The expensive replacement fluid has the appearance of brake fluid without the sulphur. Apparently Daimler now recommends frequent fluid changes. Was Daimler forced to discontinue use of sulphur for environmental reasons or did they go to the lower viscosity for MPG considerations? I liked the idea of forever fluid and wonder what has changed. Daimler gets more money this way and I heard that when the new parts boss came in about 10 years ago, the first thing he did was double parts prices to corporate acclaim. They are a sinister, sulphurous bunch!

Mercedes gave upon the idea of lifetime trans fluid about 2004. You are very lucky the trans hasn't expired.

ROGER E. 11-13-2012 12:43 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Arminius (Post 3045709)
I'll do a separate thread under "Change ML320 transmission fluid" as there is a lot of misinformation out there.

Before you do that you had better find out what the correct change interval is because it sure isn't 211,000 miles.

ps2cho 11-13-2012 04:02 AM

You could say the same about smoking and cancer...

Keep smoking (not changing the fluid) and sure you may never get cancer and something else in the body or another event caused death, but more times than not, it'll catch up to you and smoking was the cause.

I changed my girlfriends 2002 CLK320 trans fluid. Based on the sample analysis, a lot of metal content and most likely original fluid. I changed it at 104k and I think it was a very wise condition.

I have a friend with a 250k Honda Accord who says his transmission is slipping and his mechanic told him not to change it since its been too long without one. Is this just a Japanese thing? I would have thought a transmission is a transmission. Maybe the mechanic is just watching his ass just in case...

Gilly 11-13-2012 06:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by ps2cho (Post 3048537)
You could say the same about smoking and cancer...

I would compare this to a transmission this way:

"Smoking" would be like doing peel outs or "dropping" the trans (rev up in neutral and then slam into drive), yeah that's abuse and will catch up to you, eventually trans will be in bits in the bottom of the pan or maybe even the road. Very different than not doing a trans fluid change when it's a lifetime fill.

oldsinner111 11-13-2012 06:15 AM

I change both ofmy cars faithfully,and use sync atf.Instead of 30,000 miles.I can go 60,000 milesHeat destroys regular ATF.I figure 60,000

its got alot of dirt

Gilly 11-13-2012 05:18 PM

On a 722.6 or an earlier non-sealed trans?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website