![]() |
W209 CLK Suspension Question
Is it really interchangeable with the W203?
|
Maybe. The W208 CLK chassis was the W202 chassis in disguise. Same basic suspension, steering, etc. Same wheelbase, same lots of stuff.
This is not a bad thing. It's widely recognized that the W202 chassis was one of the best compact sedan platforms around. It's a very rigid platform, and you can build a very fine handling car on it. Witness the AMG versions and the CLK's, which are known for having a terrific balance of ride and handling. The only real complaint even the magazines (which usually nit-pick MB) have is the high price relative to it's competitors. I understand the W209 is based on the W203, but I have no idea of how many components are truly interchangeable. |
The design is the same, however the C209 chassis uses different front shocks. The springs & rear suspension is the same.
This isn't a bad thing!! |
Thank you!
So I guess the concept is the same as the W202 and W208... different front shocks but same rear shocks. MBDOC: what is the main difference in the front shocks? Is it the length or valving? Knowing that the factory uses different front shocks, can you use a W203 aftermarket shock on the W209? The reason is that I am curious as to why one of the major tuners use or list the same tuner lowering kit part number for both vehicles. Thanks to all on this great forum! |
Haven't measured both shocks!! But assume that like almost all other MB cars, ONLY the valving is different!
W202/203 is correct. W=sedan(wagen) C208/C209 is also correct. C= coupe also R=roadster & T=touring (station wagon) |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:21 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website