Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-20-2003, 10:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 699
List of US Mercedes Models with only 4 cylinders

Dear friends,

Could you please list Mercedes cars which have only 4 cylinders.
(including diesel and gasoline ones). Which of them is the most
reliable?

Thank you very much.

Eric

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-20-2003, 10:58 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,473
1967 two hunnet 200 D fintail, slow
any 240D is very reliable

190D 2.2 automatic, slowest thing alive

190E 2.3-16 nice car, but a tuned up 8v is about as fast
190E 2.3-8v Id prefer the 8v actually

200E w124 body euro
230E w124 body euro
__________________
Current Stable:
1994 S500 v140, 210k miles, white with grey.

Former Mercedes in the Stable:
1983 300CD Turbo diesel 515k mi sold (rumor has it, that it has 750k miles on it now)
1984 300CD Turbo Diesel 150 k mi sold
1982 300D Turbo Diesel 225 sold
1987 300D Turbo Diesel 255k mi sold
1988 300 CE AMG Hammer 15k mi sold
1986 "300E" Amg Hammer 88k mi sold (it was really a 200, not even an E (124.020)
1992 500E 156k mi sold
etc.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-20-2003, 11:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 699
Thank you very much, Omegabenz and tkamiya.

tkamiya: I'm only interested in 4-cylinder cars because I'm very much for environment, and I also do not drive fast.

SUV's with 4L+ engines should completely disappear from this earth IMHO

Thanks again.

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-21-2003, 07:27 AM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What does the fact that your car has four cylinders have to do with the environment? The most significant effect on fuel mileage is WEIGHT. Why are you not asking what is the lightest weight Mercedes ever made?

We are ALL concerned about the environment. Extremism that leads to driving cars with only four cylinders has an insignificant effect, even if everyone drove one.

The world is about BALANCE. What about folks who drive an SUV so they can haul several people rather than having three smaller cars on the road? Do the math on that.

In case you haven't noticed, this is America. I don't choose to drive an SUV, but if I did, and I were willing to spend the extra fuel money, it is my right to do so, just as it is your right to ride a bicycle if you wish. That's an idea, if you are so concerned about the environment, why don't you ride a bicycle?

Have a great day,
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:25 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 48
Amen.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-21-2003, 11:28 AM
yal's Avatar
yal yal is offline
Benz-smart
 
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: New York, Long Island
Posts: 2,707
Geeeez louise, bite the guys head off why don't you
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-21-2003, 11:44 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,303
'I'm only interested in 4-cylinder cars because I'm very much for environment, and I also do not drive fast. SUV's with 4L+ engines should completely disappear from this earth IMHO'

Yal, these statements bring strong reactions because they demonstate a strong conviction and firm conclusion based on a complete misunderstanding of the technology and and how it affects the issues that concern this individual. This same faulty reasoning is common in other non-expert fields, such as politics and political activism. It's too bad, because the issues ARE significant.

Steve
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-21-2003, 12:02 PM
LarryBible
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes, the issues absolutely are significant. What turns it all into emotion is EXTREMISM.

I am a landowner. As a landowner, I consider myself a steward of the earth, at least my little piece of it. I take this responsibility seriously, but with practicality, rather than an extremist approach.

Have a great day,
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-21-2003, 12:05 PM
PaulC
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Our originator sounds like a Honda Civic man. A new one would be cleaner burning than any of the older vehicles described to this point.

Leave the old MB's to people who know and like automobiles.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-21-2003, 07:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: USA
Posts: 699
Take it easy gentlemen!

Eric
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:15 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
How about the W115 230.4 offered through 76 and the W123 230 offered in 77 and 78?

Sixto
91 300SE
87 300SDL
83 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 3,473
if I wanted a benz in the US for fuel economy and environment I would go with the 1987 190D 2.5 turbo stick shift, extremely rare car, but about 46 mpg easy.

Microbes eat diesel soot, so its all good there.

Diesel is a byproduct of making gasoline.

If I could get any mercedes Id get the new one like the C30 AMG or something like that, its the diesel. Next year in the C coupe.
__________________
Current Stable:
1994 S500 v140, 210k miles, white with grey.

Former Mercedes in the Stable:
1983 300CD Turbo diesel 515k mi sold (rumor has it, that it has 750k miles on it now)
1984 300CD Turbo Diesel 150 k mi sold
1982 300D Turbo Diesel 225 sold
1987 300D Turbo Diesel 255k mi sold
1988 300 CE AMG Hammer 15k mi sold
1986 "300E" Amg Hammer 88k mi sold (it was really a 200, not even an E (124.020)
1992 500E 156k mi sold
etc.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-21-2003, 08:49 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally posted by omegabenz
if I wanted a benz in the US for fuel economy and environment I would go with the 1987 190D 2.5 turbo stick shift, extremely rare car, but about 46 mpg easy.
One too many cylinders :p

Sixto
91 300SE
87 300SDL
83 300SD
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-21-2003, 09:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 1999
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 645
There is usually a Citroen 2CV on E-bay. It has a 550 cc. 2 cylinder engine.

Probably the most ecological friendly cars would be the Toyota Prius or that Honda Insight 2-seater with the hybrid gas/electric engine.

The VW 1.9 TDI barely throws out any soot, gets 45+ mpg and they say they last forever.

You could run it on vegetable oil and have an exhaust that smelled like french fries, or for a special treat, burn peanut oil.

Add a teensy bit of Hershey's syrup for a Snicker's-like exhaust.

mmmmmm!
__________________
Semibodacious Transmogrifications a Specialty

1990 300D 2.5 Turbo sedan 171K (Rudolf)
1985 300D Turbo TD Wagon 219K (Remuda)

"Time flies like and arrow, yet fruit flies like a banana"
---Marx (Groucho)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-21-2003, 10:26 PM
blackmercedes's Avatar
Just a guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: St. Albert, Alberta, Canada
Posts: 3,492
I feel much the same. I want MB driving experience, but don't wish to compromise on things like fuel economy.

The aspro W202 M111 engined C-Class sounds like an ideal car for you. I get mileage in the 27-35US MPG range, but have a very sound car with superb safety, great handling, and capable of making some decent fun on a mountain road.

The M111 aspro engine (94-98) is as smooth as most sixes (save maybe for an MB six) and is easy to maintain. The 97 and 98 C230 cars have the five speed tranny which aids performance. The 1998 cars have the "later" exterior and interior bits and side air bags. They also have the SmartKey, which is nice. This time last year my father bought a super clean 1998 C230 Elegance for less than the price of a new Accord. He's loving it.

Just because someone hates SUV's doesn't mean they have to drive less than a Mercedes.

On the new car front, look at the C240 (it's a six, but very economical, especially with 6-speed) or the new C230 1.8L sedan.

You might also consider an E-Class diesel. Our 1998 E300 got 35+US MPG and was a very large car. Look at the 1996-1997 non-turbos, as they seem to be less problematic that the 98-99 turbo cars.

__________________
John Shellenberg
1998 C230 "Black Betty" 240K

http://img31.exs.cx/img31/4050/tophat6.gif
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page