PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum

PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/)
-   Tech Help (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/tech-help/)
-   -   Which Shock Absorber (http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/tech-help/68568-shock-absorber.html)

tivoliman 06-25-2003 10:44 PM

Which Shock Absorber
 
The old questions

for the 1986 560SL, should I get the Bilstein standard or heavey duty shock absorbers?

Is there a reason to go to a different brand - Konic for example.

Are there and "Leasons Learned" regarding the replacenment of the shocks?

I'm figuring both front and rear.

Thanks for your continued help and suggestions.

MRPerformance 06-26-2003 01:28 AM

Bill,

The choice is more dependent on your ride expectations/requirements than anything else. Bilstein makes excellent shocks and either one would be a fine choice. I prefer a more "connected" ride than some folks so I fit the HDs to my street cars. BTW, these shocks are pretty much a must when installing lower, stiffer springs.

If you are seeking a more comfortable ride that closely approximates the original shocks then the Bilstein Comfort model would most likely be the best option.

HTH,

///MikeR
'93 190E 2.6 Sportline

RickM 06-26-2003 10:34 AM

From what I've read here and elsewhere it seems that the Bilstien Comfort shocks are the way to go and that they are 15% stiffer than the original replacement part....as opposed to Koni.

I'll be replacing the shocks on my 380 within a week with these. I'm also upgading to 560 springs.

csnow 06-26-2003 02:49 PM

HD

cbdo 06-26-2003 06:04 PM

I didn't realize I needed to specify beyond Bilstein, so my shop installed the HDs. It's nowhere near the point of trying to negotiate a re-change after a couple thousand miles, but there's definitely more harshness over rough spots, and if I were to do it again I'd go for the Comfort version.

tivoliman 06-27-2003 08:31 AM

Bilstien Comfort shocks it is
 
Thanks for the feed back

So the Bilstien Comfort shocks will be the ones I use. Just need to get to FastLane and find time on calendar.

Thanks.:)

csnow 06-30-2003 10:02 AM

Too late to appeal for HD?

cbdo 06-30-2003 07:54 PM

csnow, how would you describe the difference in ride and in handling? Curious as I've not had a chance to sample both.

csnow 06-30-2003 10:15 PM

Well, I suppose it is all matter of personal preference, but I have had excellent results with HDs in a wide variety of applications over the years. I find MBs of that vintage to be rather 'soft' by modern standards.

HDs are firm, but not harsh (IMHO), and consistently a good match for stock springs, so one does not lose any travel. I tried a similar SL with them once, and thought the ride was nice. Did not do a 'before and after' though.

Best of luck.

BDBENZ 07-01-2003 07:28 PM

The 560 came standard with the HD's. They do offer a comfort shock, you would be going with a 450 setup and still have the stiffer 560 springs. Stay with the HD's IMO.

BD:) :)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website