Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Tech Help

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-06-2003, 04:49 PM
farena
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Bridgestone Turanza LS-H vs. Michelin MXV4 Plus..

I need new tires for my '95 S500.

The factory tires are the Michelin MXV4 Plus' .

I've heard good things about Bridgestone Turanza LS-H's compared to the Michelin's, and they also cost less.

Anybody have any opinions ???

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-06-2003, 05:05 PM
fahrgewehr2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 1,264
I have used both, currently have the B-stones. They are cheaper and better than the michelins in everyway excepting some road noise.

Mike
__________________
'90 300SE 298k
-300K and it gets put into retirement.
'80 300D 255k Purchased new by family in 1980.

Had a:
1973 220 (gas)
1980 300SD
1992 400E
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-06-2003, 05:08 PM
haasman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,097
Consider the Bridgestone RE950's.

I went through the www.tirerack.com site and checked the ratings, it was there that made me aware of the RE950 tire.

If I recall correctly, better performance for less money.

Haasman
__________________
'03 E320 Wagon-Sold
'95 E320 Wagon-Went to Ex
'93 190E 2.6-Wrecked
'91 300E-Went to Ex
'65 911 Coupe (#302580)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2003, 02:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 398
I second the Bridgestone 950's. I just put a set on my E420 and thus far I love them.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2003, 03:32 PM
dtf dtf is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: South East CT
Posts: 874
I have Turanza on the E300TD and Potenza 950 on the E320 wagon. I think the Turanza is better in the rain but both are very, very good all around.
__________________
dtf
1994 E320 Wagon (Died @ 308,669 miles)
1995 E300 Diesel (228,000)
1999 E300 Turbodiesel ( died @ 255,000)
2006 Toyota Tundra SR5 AC 4X4 (115,000 miles) rusted frame - sold to chop shop
2011 Audi A4 Avant (165,000 miles) Seized engine - donated to Salvation Army
BMW 330 xi 6 speed manual (175,034 miles)
2014 E350 4Matic Wagon 128,000 miles
2018 Dodge Ram 21,000 miles
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2003, 03:50 PM
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,084
Turanzas 92 SEL

Having gone thru a number of MXVs,with not too much elation and poor tire wear. I switched to Turanzas, I am happier, they ride a little harder and when comparing them off the wheels the sidewalls seemed to be stiffer. The installer also noted that they have a dot on the tire to indicate the valve stem position, plus they seem to balance better. My 92SEL is one of the cronic vibration cars, if not balanced properly(Hunter road-force) is the choice.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-12-2003, 02:00 PM
farena
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Thanks Tire Rack and Paddock Performance in Haverstraw, New York

Guys,

I had Paddock Performance in Haverstraw, NY order from The Tire Rack the Bridgestone Turanza's for my '95 S500. These guys at Paddock Performance have a real nice speed shop with the latest Hunter Balancing and Alignment gear you can get.

In summary, the ride at 115 MPH has never felt better (I don’t have the guts to go any faster). These tires also are nice and quiet and I definitely notice a great improvement in handling.

Thanks for everyone’s input about the tires vs. the Michelin's.

Also, check out some of the gear these guys at Paddock Performance can set you up with (Way cool is the movie of the custom exhaust for the Acura NSX):

www.paddockperformance.com
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-12-2003, 02:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Crossett, AR
Posts: 42
I bought Potenza's for my car. They are great, better than the Michelins as far as I'm concerned.
__________________
dyazdani
_________________
'97 C230
'03 Honda CBR600RR
'92 Ford Explorer
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-12-2003, 02:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: North Central Kentucky
Posts: 1,069
I have had the MXV4s on two MBs now. First on my 560SEL which I replaced with wider Dunlap SP5000s-good all round tire. Wife's 560SL has them. I just had her car up to 100mph at KY Speedway (1.5 mile oval) last weekend and they performed poorly. Turning with more than a little side load at 85 and they were crying. Not a good feeling at those speeds. Wish I had the time to swap my Dunlaps onto the SL before going to the track. When they were out, they will be replaced with something else.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-12-2003, 03:34 PM
haasman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,097
... and may I offer, regardless of the tire, tire pressures are very important on these cars, very.

For me, the difference of the cold inflation of 28PSI (supposed min. recommendation for fronts) vs. 32PSI cold is truly remarkable. The cars suddenly feel like they are "in the groove" again.

I put all of the cars, except the wagon, at 32PSI COLD. Measuring before driving not one mile so there is no tire heat. It has been said tire air loss is about 2PSI a month. Cooler temperatures lower tire pressures.

For extended high-speed driving and/or additional loads, tires need to be inflated more.

Checking warm, let alone hot tires for pressure is a guess at best. If in doubt add more air, just don't exceed the printed tire manufacturers warning on the sidewall.

Good driving,

Haasman
__________________
'03 E320 Wagon-Sold
'95 E320 Wagon-Went to Ex
'93 190E 2.6-Wrecked
'91 300E-Went to Ex
'65 911 Coupe (#302580)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-12-2003, 05:07 PM
euronatura's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guatemala, Central America
Posts: 375
How does one?

Haasman:

Everyone states that tire pressure be checked cold. Now my question is, if I check at home I do not have a compressor to fill the tire. I must drive about 1 miles to the closet gas station to fill the tires with air. Which, by that time, the tire is no loner cold.

Therefore, my question is, if I check my tire at home cold. And I see that I need 2 lbs more, when I get to the station do I retake teh reading and add two more pounds?

How does one really do this?

Thanks, Iggy
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

2006 - Suzuki Gran Vitara (2.0 L fully equipped) Like this car so far except for trying to put on the seatbelt.
1988 - 190e - 2.3L - 172K miles (It now belongs to the exwife)
1999 - Chevy Blazer LS Fully Equiped - killed it June 2006
2001 - Honda Civic EX - 68K miles (sold June 2004)
1963 - 220S - Dual Carb 6 cyl. (sold)
1994 - Yamaha WaveRaider (fun to ride)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-12-2003, 05:15 PM
haasman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,097
Yes, that is what I sometimes do:

Check cold. Drive to the local air supply. Check again. I allow for the heated up difference by putting in additional air.

For an example, I want the tire to be at 32PSI:

Cold: 27

After 1 mile: 29

At the air source: 34

Or, you can over fill them the night before and bleed off excess the next morning. Often I have been surprised when doing this in that they are not all that "over-filled"

Hopefully this explains it.

Haasman
__________________
'03 E320 Wagon-Sold
'95 E320 Wagon-Went to Ex
'93 190E 2.6-Wrecked
'91 300E-Went to Ex
'65 911 Coupe (#302580)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-12-2003, 05:18 PM
euronatura's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Guatemala, Central America
Posts: 375
THANKS!

Thanks, Haasman.

I guess I will giev the over filling tonight a try on my way home and then check in the morning,

Iggy
__________________
Insanity: doing the same thing over and over again and expecting different results.

2006 - Suzuki Gran Vitara (2.0 L fully equipped) Like this car so far except for trying to put on the seatbelt.
1988 - 190e - 2.3L - 172K miles (It now belongs to the exwife)
1999 - Chevy Blazer LS Fully Equiped - killed it June 2006
2001 - Honda Civic EX - 68K miles (sold June 2004)
1963 - 220S - Dual Carb 6 cyl. (sold)
1994 - Yamaha WaveRaider (fun to ride)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-12-2003, 05:31 PM
haasman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 3,097
You are welcome.

Be sure and report back, it will be interesting what you measure.

Good driving,

Haasman

__________________
'03 E320 Wagon-Sold
'95 E320 Wagon-Went to Ex
'93 190E 2.6-Wrecked
'91 300E-Went to Ex
'65 911 Coupe (#302580)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page