|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Time for new tires. Recommendations?
So I'm sniffing around looking for a set of tires for my '68 220. I believe the original size was the now-discontinued 175SR14, and from my research, it sounds like 195-70R14 is about the right replacement size (with 185-75R14 a close second).
So...recommendations for a good all-around tire, ideally less than $70 apiece? I can't afford much more than that. I've been looking at BF Goodrich Traction T/A and Yokohama Aegis. Pros? Cons? Alternatives? Hit me. And thanks in advance!
__________________
Carmody Wichita, Kansas USA Air Capital of the World 1968 220 (my first MB!) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Tirerack.com
Research your tires for your car here. Get an unbiased opinion. Then print off the tire price, take it to Discount Tire or other reputable place and have them match the tire price. I saved $150 on a set of Conti-pros all season with the price match gaurentee.
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I've actually been perusing Tire Rack, as well as every tire-related thread I could find here. And I definitely have noticed that Tire Rack's prices seem to beat list at most places...that's a good idea, taking their price around locally.
Any brands/types I should specifically avoid?
__________________
Carmody Wichita, Kansas USA Air Capital of the World 1968 220 (my first MB!) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
>>175SR14, and from my research, it sounds like 195-70R14 is about the right replacement size (with 185-75R14 a close second).
>> 185/75 is closer to original SR size. 195/70 is a shorter tire due to aspect ratio of 70% |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Avoid continentals at all cost, I put them on my 6.9. Every time it rains, I end up going arse backwards towards oncoming traffic when i try to overtake.
__________________
With best regards Al |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
I have the BF Goodrich Traction T/A's on my 4.5 in 205/70R14 (or is it 75?) - they have great traction dry, low road noise, good snow traction (great for an all season) and wonderful wet traction! Their treadwear isn't that great but, for the price, definitely go for them.
__________________
Current: 2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee" 2018 Durango R/T Previous: 1972 280SE 4.5 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi" 1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
I have BFG Traction TA (H rated) my '86 300E and like them a lot. I never drive at 9/10ths any more and they handle just fine in everyday situations. Keep in mind that (....and I do like TireRack) Costco's price, about $8.00 more per skin (this month) includes lifetime balance and rotation.
__________________
62 220sb 67 250S 72 280SE 4.5 74 280C 77 300D 82 240D 85 190E 2.3 86 300E RIP 12/28/09 85 300SD 92 300D 2.5 00 E320 Current Over 1,000,000 miles in Benzes, Since66 ....and a whole passel of BMW 2002 and Tii |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Hey, thanks, folks. I appreciate the input.
__________________
Carmody Wichita, Kansas USA Air Capital of the World 1968 220 (my first MB!) |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Sumitomo HTR 200. Not good for snow but great for dry and good for wet. $50 Currently have a set on 350 sl and 450 sel. Wil install on 250 sl when needed.
__________________
Happy Benzing Darryl, Hill 2005 SL55 AMG Kleemanized 1984 500 SEC 1967 W113 California Coupe [SIGPIC] https://picasaweb.google.com/lh/myphotos |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Tire prices
Your best bet in tires is to go to local reputable dealers and get their best price ...... Tire Rack does have good basic prices, but by the time you pay shipping and then pay the inflated mounting rates that local companies charge for tires they did not sell, you are usually behing the eight ball regarding total cost. Also, getting someone to match Tire Rack prices locally should include the delivered price, including shipping, to be fair. Again, the variance will then probably be minimal. My experience, Ben Carter
__________________
Ben Harrison Carter 1999 Mercedes ML320 87K 1992 Mercedes 300CE 89K 1995 Corvette 29K -- Sold Dec 09 1989 Mercedes 420SEL 99K -- (Sold 4/08) 1968 Mercedes 230S (106K) (Sold 9/06)) 1976 Mercedes 450SEL 130K (Just sold - 06) 1961 Mercedes 220Sb (sold years ago) |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
I have been using michelins for over twenty years, i have had others and always come back to them, for about ten or fifteen per tire more you can have michelins, you will find they are cheaper in the long run,
Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
I use a local independant.
Sam's and Wallyworld and whatever dot com are cheaper but: He'll dismount and dispose all the crap junk car tires I bring him. He'll charge me a fair price. When I need to pick up our car after hours he'll leave it on the lot with a invoice on the dash; just slip a check under the door or pay him in the next few days...
__________________
Over 21 years I owned several: w108 w110 w111 w115 w116 w123 w124 w126 w212 |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Tires on original steel wheels?
Quote:
The best fit is to look for tires made for the old Volkswagen Transporters. They use 185-14, with a tall aspect ratio, and also have a higher weight capacity than is typically found in the cheaper tires. I've currently got a parts car W114 250 with 185/70-14 tires and they look undertired for the car. Jim
__________________
14 E250 BlueTEC black. 45k miles 95 E320 Cabriolet Emerald green 66k miles 94 E320 Cabriolet Emerald green 152k miles 85 300TD 4 spd man, euro bumpers and lights, 15" Pentas dark blue 274k miles |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
According to my research, the original tire for the car (175SR14) had an aspect ratio of .82. So here's the math on the sidewall height: 175SR14 = 143.5 (original size tires) 215/75R14 = 161.25 (current oversize tires) 185/75R14 = 138.75 195/70R14 = 136.5 Does anybody here think that the 195/70 is too small? Again, my final gearing is steeper than it used to be, so I don't mind terribly losing a little extra tire size...but I also don't want the car to look like a Hot Wheels car, with little tires rolling around in vast, empty wheel wells. Thanks for the advice, everybody...keep it comin'!
__________________
Carmody Wichita, Kansas USA Air Capital of the World 1968 220 (my first MB!) |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Aspect ratio of the original tire was 80%, so the 185/75 is very close ..and with that gear change ,I would use them...many guys do a rear change b/c the original was actually too high for modern roads.
If you want a little more tire , use the 195..I wouldn't. |
Bookmarks |
|
|