|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Need Opinions: 1972 220d
Greetings
I am looking for opinions on the 1972 220d. Specifically as opposed to the 240d. Thanks in advance Pete |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
the 220D's had the smaller bumpers and pre-face lift styling. The 240D had the larger federalized bumpers. There is not much by way of power between the two and they both car rust like you won't believe so buy based on condition and nothing else.
__________________
With best regards Al |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Slower than a 240d.... If that was even possible, but it is.
Don't even think of racing an automatic VW campmobile filled with boy scouts. You will lose.
__________________
"Our Lady of Blessed Acceleration... don't Fail Us Now" |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Manuals aren't too bad, but autobox cars are painfully slow. The W115 is a lovely chassis, though. As mentioned, beware the rust. Jim
__________________
14 E250 BlueTEC black. 45k miles 95 E320 Cabriolet Emerald green 66k miles 94 E320 Cabriolet Emerald green 152k miles 85 300TD 4 spd man, euro bumpers and lights, 15" Pentas dark blue 274k miles |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|