Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-20-2014, 07:42 AM
Baxterdown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 269
Which Gasoline?

Hi guys, I've been meaning to ask this question. My car's seller strongly recommended I only put 90 octane ethanol-free gas in my car (1972 w108), which I have done diligently since I bought it earlier this year. He said regular gas will destroy our cars.

Is that so? Is it really necessary to only use ethanol-free gas?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

Jose

__________________
Current
1972 280SE 4.5 Dark Green, Cognac. Pics!
2014 Range Rover Sport Supercharged. Santorini Black, Dynamic Package, Front Climate Comfort and Visibility Package, Vision and Convenience Package.


Gone But Not Forgotten
2010 Explorer Limited, 2010 R350 4MATIC, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland, 2009 Audi A4 Cabriolet, 2009 Ford Flex, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML350, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E350, 2007 Mercedes-Benz C230, 2005 BMW X5.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-20-2014, 09:25 AM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
Your friend's 3.5 needs 91 minimum, probably 93. Your 4.5 is supposed to be able to run on 87 (I was always told this) but my 4.5 knocked on anything less than 91. It may depend on your engine condition, timing, and other components. It can also be a factor of if you have the 8.8:1 heads or 8.0:1 heads. It's one of those "YMMV" things.
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-20-2014, 11:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 115
I always run premium in my Benz gassers...in fact I even put it in my '63 Falcon convertible with the 170 I6. It idles a lot smoother and doesn't have that "cough" that plagues the Ford sixes with the stock log intake.
__________________
1963 Ford Falcon Convertible
1972 220D 4-speed
1986 190D 2.5 5-speed
1999 300D
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-20-2014, 01:47 PM
Baxterdown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 269
Thanks for your replies guys. I'm happy to use 93. My main concern is the ethanol. The seller said that it would destroy the tank, lines, engine, etc.

Any thoughts on that?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Current
1972 280SE 4.5 Dark Green, Cognac. Pics!
2014 Range Rover Sport Supercharged. Santorini Black, Dynamic Package, Front Climate Comfort and Visibility Package, Vision and Convenience Package.


Gone But Not Forgotten
2010 Explorer Limited, 2010 R350 4MATIC, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland, 2009 Audi A4 Cabriolet, 2009 Ford Flex, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML350, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E350, 2007 Mercedes-Benz C230, 2005 BMW X5.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-20-2014, 03:38 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
Honestly? Ethanol does that to all cars. Sure, modern cars also have plastic tanks and plastic fuel lines, but metal components still get eaten up. It isn't the ethanol, it's the hygroscopic properties of it. In other words, ethanol absorbs moisture from the atmosphere, and it's that moisture that will cause the problems.
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-20-2014, 03:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 115
From what I understand Tomguy is 100% right. Drive it regularly and keep fresh fuel in and it shouldn't be a problem...I've run ethanol gas for 4 years in my Falcon with no issues. If I know it's going to be off the road for a while I'll get a bottle of fuel additive that specifically states that it protects against water buildup in ethanol-blended fuels and make sure it's run throughout the fuel system before parking it.
__________________
1963 Ford Falcon Convertible
1972 220D 4-speed
1986 190D 2.5 5-speed
1999 300D
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-20-2014, 07:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Las Vegas & N. Cal
Posts: 347
Some consideration for thought :
Ethanol in fact can completely ruin a motor in ways . Ethanol is like a Baby , I think of it as a Government baby just like Smog controls , devices a money maker .
Ethanol ( Corn ) well ruin non compliant Fuel Lines , it brakes them down also many plastics. So Best thing is to change out all Hi Pressure Fuel Lines to Ethanol high pressure Lines . Why ? because if they leak and catch fire your Vehicle and self may burn .
Long term Damage to valves , Motors well happen but it takes a long time .
Most Ethanol Damage :
Well Most damage is due to Ethanol that just sits and is not used , just sitting in a Tank a Line a Injector , some Plastic part that sort of thing . When it sits you have the problem that's why they sell Ethanol Stabilizer .
You Don't add Ethanol Stabilizer when your using the car you add it when your going to let it sit and add it a day before when your still using the car to mix it in good .
Better yet just drain the system all together .
whats sitting a long time ? more then 90 days
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-21-2014, 12:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 22,037
Back when the switch to unlead came about, in 1975 or 1976 depending where you were, there was a great deal of concern about valve life. It seems one of the things lead was good for was acting as a cushion for the valve edges. Without the lead it was predicted that the valves would 'recede' into the cylinder head.

As far as I know this has not become a big problem. At least it never was for me and I never had to tear an engine down to install hardened valves.

Anyone have any further info on this subject?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-21-2014, 12:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Coldest North America
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
Thanks for your replies guys. I'm happy to use 93. My main concern is the ethanol. The seller said that it would destroy the tank, lines, engine, etc.

I avoid ethanol fuel and run premium in all carburated engines. The EFI engines seem more tolerant of alcohol fuel mixes and their components are more ethanol resistant.
__________________
“Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.” ― Robert A. Heinlein
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-21-2014, 12:08 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
Hi guys, I've been meaning to ask this question. My car's seller strongly recommended I only put 90 octane ethanol-free gas in my car (1972 w108), which I have done diligently since I bought it earlier this year. He said regular gas will destroy our cars.

Is that so? Is it really necessary to only use ethanol-free gas?

Thanks in advance for your thoughts.

Jose
I have a 72 107. I have run it on regular 87 gas for past 25 years. No affect on fuel systems or engine.

One thing ethanol may affect, is mixture control. Modern cars have feedback from exhaust composition, but our old cars do not. Ethanol reduces stoichiometric ratio for the fuel, so original 1972 %CO figures may not be optimum. I have found that running on slightly rich side at idle and under load gives good performance and helps reduce hot start problems.

Here in Canada, I believe regular has "up to" 10% ethanol.
__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-21-2014, 12:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 22,037
When the switch to unlead came about the new fuel would sometimes eat up the accelerator pump in some cars. Chrysler products were very prone to this.

By now everything on the road would have had its' carb rebuilt, but if you are bringing an old car out of a long sleep with today's unleaded fuel this can be an issue.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-22-2014, 09:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Middle Haddam, CT
Posts: 315
Beginning in 1972 and for some years thereafter Mercedes was forced to reduce the compression ration in all its USA bound cars from 9/9.5:1 to 8:1 to meet US emissions requirements. An 8:1 engine that doesn't have excessively advanced ignition timing shouldn't require premium fuel.
__________________
Berfinroy in CT
Present vehicles:
1973 300 SEL 4.5
1959 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud I
1959 Ford Thunderbird convertible/430
Past vehicles;
1958 Bentley S 1
1976 ex-Max Hoffman 6.9
1970 300SEL 2.8
1958 Jaguar MK IX
1961 Jaguar MK IX
1963 Jaguar E-type factory special roadster
1948 Plymouth woody
1955 Morgan plus 4
1966 Shelby GT350H Mustang
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-22-2014, 09:47 AM
Baxterdown's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Fort Lauderdale, FL
Posts: 269
Guys, thanks for your replies! I'm confused now... Doesn't premium have ethanol in it too? From what I'm reading you guys are saying that it doesn't. If that's the case I'll just switch to premium for my car.

I had asked the original question because the nearest gas station that sells ethanol-free 90 gas is 7 or 8 miles away. So it's a pain to get gas. If 93 premium doesn't have ethanol, I'm good!?!?
__________________
Current
1972 280SE 4.5 Dark Green, Cognac. Pics!
2014 Range Rover Sport Supercharged. Santorini Black, Dynamic Package, Front Climate Comfort and Visibility Package, Vision and Convenience Package.


Gone But Not Forgotten
2010 Explorer Limited, 2010 R350 4MATIC, 2011 Jeep Grand Cherokee Overland, 2009 Audi A4 Cabriolet, 2009 Ford Flex, 2008 Mercedes-Benz ML350, 2008 Mercedes-Benz E350, 2007 Mercedes-Benz C230, 2005 BMW X5.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-22-2014, 02:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: PDX->OR->USA
Posts: 377
One addition, I use Sta-bil Ethanol Treatment, NOT to be confused with the fuel stabilizer. The Treatment specifically prevents the phase separation, or the release of water the fuel has absorbed, so it helps protect the exposed tank and other elements by making sure the water is burned as part of the combustion process rather than being left in-tank. My car starts and runs so much better now that I use this in every single tank, one $6 bottle lasts me about 4-5 tanks I believe based on the recommended concentrations/dilution.
__________________
1962 220SE W111 Coupe, 2nd owner

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../SideSmall.jpg

The Coupe Group (W111/112 coupes and cabs) official website
The Coupe Group on Facebook
MotoArigato: Roadworthy News & Humor
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11-22-2014, 03:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Coldest North America
Posts: 833
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baxterdown View Post
Guys, thanks for your replies! I'm confused now... Doesn't premium have ethanol in it too? ....?
Not where I buy fuel. It's listed right on the pump:
regular has "up to" 10% ethanol.
mid-grade has "up to" 5% ethanol.
premium has "no" ethanol.

It's easy to test and see for yourself.

Place 1" of water in a tall straight sided glass jar or clear plastic bottle, and make a mark at that level. Make another mark 5" above the first mark. Fill with gasoline to the upper mark and shake to mix the water and gasoline, then let it sit until the two fluids completely separate. For every tenth of an inch the division between the gas and water has risen above the 1" mark, there is 2% ethanol in the gasoline. For more accuracy use a taller container for a 10" sample and 1/10" is then 1%.

__________________
“Never attempt to teach a pig to sing; it wastes your time and annoys the pig.” ― Robert A. Heinlein

Last edited by John Galt; 11-22-2014 at 04:13 PM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page