Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 11-08-2015, 08:13 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Orlando, Fl
Posts: 37
I appreciate your advice Mxfrank, I have decided to forfiet in my quest to find a better, and more wallet friendly solution to this. These driveshaft are wildly over priced for what you are getting. But I have to do what I have to do.

Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 11-08-2015, 07:22 PM
Tony H's Avatar
Tony
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Bandon, Oregon
Posts: 1,546
My coupe has a 3 piece drive shaft with 3 U joints and 2 center bearings. Not sure why they did that-maybe for smoothness?
__________________
Tony H
W111 280SE 3.5 Coupe
Manual transmission

Past cars:
Porsche 914 2.0
'64 Jaguar XKE Roadster
'57 Oval Window VW
'71 Toyota Hilux Pickup Truck-Dad bought new
'73 Toyota Celica GT
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 11-08-2015, 10:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Posts: 543
The multi-piece driveshafts vibrate less than the one piece units. For example in the previous gen Camaro the V6 car had a 2 piece drive shaft, but the V8 had a one piece, as V8s cancel out more vibrations than V6s. Also, as previously stated, if there are 2 UJs in the system the driveshaft will vibrate less if the UJs work at a small angle vs all the shafts being in line.
__________________
Csaba
1972 280SEL 4.5, silver
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 11-09-2015, 11:19 AM
Stretch's Avatar
...like a shield of steel
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Somewhere in the Netherlands
Posts: 14,461
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tony H View Post
My coupe has a 3 piece drive shaft with 3 U joints and 2 center bearings. Not sure why they did that-maybe for smoothness?
And possibly the expense of future repairs!

3 UJs is just weird - one is bad enough - two cancels out of line eccentric vibrations - three puts it back to "one"...

...and all for a short wheel base too. May be it was cheaper to balance three short shafts instead of two longer ones?
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver
1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone
1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy!
1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing

I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior



Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits!
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 11-09-2015, 06:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 7,534
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stretch View Post
And possibly the expense of future repairs!

3 UJs is just weird - one is bad enough - two cancels out of line eccentric vibrations - three puts it back to "one"...

...and all for a short wheel base too. May be it was cheaper to balance three short shafts instead of two longer ones?

Not really, many trucks have a 2 piece drive shaft and 3 joints. On a MB, a drive disc acts like a CV joint effectively making it like the truck system I've described.

The more common MB with 2 drive discs and 1 u joint works because the u joint is running near straight making drive shaft speed variation near zero.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page