Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2003, 03:23 PM
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Flyover State
Posts: 1,364
4.5 sits high in rear end

Would the rear up sitting up high in the back most likely be caused by worn sub mounts?
Yes the front sits low and I like that look but the back sits really high and the tires in the back are angled out at the top causing the outside edge to wear. It wasn't handling very well in the rain yesterday and actually got a little loose on one curve.

Is there an adjustment on the rear end?
Thanks!

Btw, definitely it is NOT equipped with rear compensator. . .
I think

__________________
63 220S W111
76 300D W115
2013 VW JSW TDI M6

previously-
73 280 SEL 4.5
86 300E 5 speed
2010 VW Jetta TDI M6
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2003, 07:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
Mine sits too low up front too, and I DEFINITELY need new bushings. I have them, just haven't had time to get them in. Well, to be honest, I've not taken the time yet.

New mounts will raise the body about an inch, I think, so if it sits low after the new mounts are in, you probably have sagging front springs. I'm hoping that isn't the case, but will deal with it when I have to.

The rear height is adjustable with rubber spring seats and the spring cup, also I believe there are several different spring rates for the car, you may have stiffer springs back there than you should.

Tires should have just a little negative camber with a full tank of gas and two people in the rear, it may ride high enough with an empty tank to show a tiny bit of positive camber.

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2003, 11:28 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
I THINK all 108 bodies had a rear compensator. If it's bad it would not exhert enough pressure to counter your springs and cause a jacked rear end. It could be disconnected as well. I assume you arent using tires too small? It'd cause wear on the outer edge and would make it look like a high rearend due to too much clearance between the well and tire.
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-14-2003, 12:09 AM
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Flyover State
Posts: 1,364
Mine has the spring type compensator. I researched it with a flashlight and a pair of sandals.
It has 195/75 R14's all around.
I guess I'll see what happens after new sub mounts go in.
Maybe I should put some bricks in the trunk so the rear tire doesn't wear through

__________________
63 220S W111
76 300D W115
2013 VW JSW TDI M6

previously-
73 280 SEL 4.5
86 300E 5 speed
2010 VW Jetta TDI M6
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page