Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-27-2006, 04:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
3.5/4.5 V8 parts interchange

I'm new to site, but have question for anyone with 116/117 motor knowledge.
Will 3.5 cam bearing surfaces fit 4.5 cam bearing towers ?

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-27-2006, 04:40 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
Yes. Although your best course is to use the 3.5 towers matched to the cams, or new towers, because wear patterns on the old towers will not match wear patterns on the "New" camshafts. Also, be aware of the two different cam designs: One cam design has the oil supply groove in the last bearing of cam itself, the other in the last tower. These are not compatible with each other. Past that, they are 100% compatible.

Also be aware that cams from a hydraulic ball stud engine will not work on a mechanical stud one, and vice-versa. This can be solved easily if going from hydraulic to mechanical studs by removing the hydraulic ones and installing the mechanical ones. The other way around tends not to work because the heads usually do not have the oil pasages for the studs.
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-08-2006, 02:56 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
3.5/4.5 cams

Thanks for your reply. Sorry to be so long getting back to you but personal matters have had me away. Any way, back to your reply, I'm presuming from
what you said, 3.5 towers will fit 4.5 heads. The rest of the valve gear is in good condition as far as rocker to cam surfaces, so I'm not intending to replace ball studs or rockers. Basically, I'm trying to confirm 3.5 new cams & towers will fit to existing 4.5 heads in 79 450 SLC & that 4.5 cam sprockets are compatible & timing marks will align as before. I do intend to replace cam
oiler fittings, timing chain, tensioner & upper rails, but hopefully nothing else unless I'm overlooking something. What do you think ? regards.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-08-2006, 04:21 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
If you need to replace cams because they were worn (not for performance), you WILL need to change the rockers.

If your 3.5 source cams came from an engine with mechanical ball studs, you WILL need to change them (remove the hydraulic ones, replace with mechanical).

If you don't change the rockers, your new cams will be eaten apart by the soft worn rocker surfaces in no time.
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-09-2006, 03:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
Got your message. This is a performance swap, not due to wear, however it sounds as though new rockers would be a good plan, along with adjustable
ball studs. I guess the unanswered qustion is whether all this stuff will fit to
79 450 SLC heads & will 4.5 sprockets fit & timing marks align as before. thanks.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-09-2006, 06:57 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
Everything will fit great. For the best performance on your 450, if you have the entire 3.5 engine, swap the whole top end (heads and all). Trust me - you will be glad you did.
__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-10-2006, 05:22 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 4
Thanks for your input. Unfortunately, I don't have a 3.5 motor. The cams will be new, along with the rest of the valve gear. Why do you suggest the 3.5 heads, as the intake & exhaust valves are identical for 3.5 & 4.5 ? Is there some advantage to flow or exhaust ? Just curious. Thanks, jackson
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-10-2006, 06:34 PM
Tomguy's Avatar
Vintage Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: near Scranton, PA
Posts: 5,407
Higher compression -> more power!

__________________
Current:
2021 Charger Scat Pack Widebody "Sinabee"
2018 Durango R/T

Previous:
1972 280SE 4.5
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Limited "Hefe", 1992 Jeep Cherokee Laredo "Jeepy", 2006 Charger R/T "Hemi"
1999 Chrysler 300M - RIP @ 221k
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page