Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2009, 09:29 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 154
Spark Plug gap confusion

On this board and some others I am seeing two different specs for spark plug gaps. Does anyone know why, or would like to take a stab at why which one is more right than the other.

My book says .7mm-.8mm or around .030 inches.

Some others seem to be pretty sure that it is .023 inches. I'm confused.

I am using NGK BP6ES.

There does seem to be concensus on the points gap, between .012-.016.

Thanks
Eddie

__________________
1965 220SEb Manual

Last edited by Scutch; 05-19-2009 at 01:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-19-2009, 07:21 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,358
Factory specs are the .023". The NGK plugs work well at .030". A wider gap will give a "hotter" spark to a certain point. It actually isn't any hotter but you have a longer arc which allows more of the air/gas mixture to come into contact with the arc. The factory specs were a "fail safe" gap for the older plugs.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:01 PM
mespe's Avatar
benzbonz
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 1,848
my 67 250SL will not fire with the NGK and a .30 Gap,,, spent hours trying to figure out why I wasn't getting a spark.
__________________
Closing the store
Benzbonz.biz
on your smart phone or tablet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-20-2009, 10:10 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Florida / N.H.
Posts: 8,804
NGK was not why your 113 was not firing...
__________________
A Dalton
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-24-2009, 11:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Fort Collins, CO
Posts: 154
So would it be safe to say that I should widen the spark plug gap as much as I can for maximum efficiency? I assume at some point I will know when I have gone too far from some sort of missing or something like that and then I will go back down a couple hundreths. Is that the "advanced" way to do it?

I also noticed that the wider the point gap was, the higher the idle, and I believe, the better acceleration response, but if I went too wide I would start to lose power at high RPMs.

For instance, the points specs are .012-.016 inches. I just figured, okay that means .014 to be safe. But maybe I should go to .016 if it still runs well? Eh?


Should I also be going for the widest point there (points), as well, before I notice the power loss? Or do i jepardize something by doing so, i.e., maybe the car runs too hot or I prematurely wear the points or plugs?

I don't have a dwell meter btw.
__________________
1965 220SEb Manual

Last edited by Scutch; 05-24-2009 at 11:42 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-25-2009, 10:02 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Florida / N.H.
Posts: 8,804

I don't have a dwell meter btw.
__________________
>

You should get one..the problem with old distributors is the parts are worn and the factory gap specs op not usually get you the dwell you want..so , a dwell meter is best b/c it is the true open/close angle the car is designed for.
The big factor in point gap is the fact that gap has a direct effect on engine Timing...if you close the gap, you automatically advance the timing, and visa/versa.... so, get a dweel..see em them ebap for cheap cuz they are outdated.

..and always set the dwell before setting the timing w/strobe.

That is the correct way..but you can fool with the points and still get a satisfactory result..but why, when it is so easy to get it perfect.
.030 is fine on those plugs..if they oil foul, don't change the gap, go to the next heat range ..[ NGK heat ranges increase with numerical decrease.]
__________________
A Dalton
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-25-2009, 10:30 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 5,358
i.e., NGK BP5ES are "hotter" than BP6ES. It works the same way with the newer NGK stocking numbers. A 7333 is hotter than a 7433 etc.

Widening the gap reaches a point of diminishing returns. If you set them at .035" then after a few hundred thousands of firing the gap will widen to .036" due to wear and metal transfer from the spark.

.030" is a good setting which will give you pretty close to a combination of peak firing AND longevity.

Point gap is an entirely different situation. The points are triggering the coil high voltage spark output. Too wide of a spark delays the firing and too narrow does not allow the coil to "recharge" it's electrical field. That is a very simplistic view of the process but close enough for understanding.

Last edited by Mike D; 05-25-2009 at 10:35 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-25-2009, 10:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Florida / N.H.
Posts: 8,804
>

Yeah, another way of putting it...'Inverse' works too, and Bosch are the opposite..higher/hotter.

These ignitions were not High Energy by a long shot, so I never go beyond .030 on any of them..and the spark heat is higher at a lower gap, but the kernal time is longer at a larger gap..so, a better idle is gotten with a larger gap...with .030 being close to ideal, with a Non resistor plug.

The best bang for the buck on any of these old ign systems is to simply do a point conversion and be done with mechanical switching...it's history.
Short $$$ - Big Reward

__________________
A Dalton

Last edited by Arthur Dalton; 05-25-2009 at 10:54 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page