Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2010, 08:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: burr ridge il
Posts: 5
mercedes 250ce

please advise what in what years the m114e engine was used in the 250ce and what type of fuel injection was used on this engine,i.e., mechanical or electronic? my guess is the engine used from 1968-71 was a 114.980 but i do not have a clue regarding the fuel injection. i am also aware the car was not sold in the u. s. i currently own a 71 carburated 250c and am toying with the idea of switching over to a fuel injection based power plant. any help you can provide regarding the m114e engine will be greatly appreciated.
bohemianboy

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2010, 10:07 PM
cth350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,356
visit the vintage forum. There's a live thread by user JiveTurkey about his 250E restoration.

The motor was called an M114E, which is a D-jet fuel injected version of the 2.5l M114V (carbed) motor. To turn one motor into the other, swap the head and then find all the intake and fuel parts.

Far easier is to find an M123 manifold. That's the 2.5l motor introduced in 1977 along with the W123 chassis cars. Finding that will be very difficult. But if you do find one, you can use a simple rochester 4bbl carb or a tbi setup from a chevy.

Another manifold possibility is the unimog manifold from an M180 motor. There are some varients of these venerable straight 6 motors that had a single carb. I've never seen one, so I'm not sure what the base looks like. Probably similar to what you have now, but a single flange instead of two.

Having gone past your exotic options, You could, in theory try two throttle bodies with a megasquirt controller. Search the forum for other megasquirt combinations. They're there.

Thx -CTH
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2010, 10:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Are you sure you don't have an M130? Wikipedia indicates that the coupes all got the M130, but their information in that area is a little suspect, since the page has a table listing the 114.011 (of which I have one) not going into production until 1972. Mine's a 1971 model with a January 1971 build date.

Linky: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_W114
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-10-2010, 10:29 PM
cth350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,356
that wiki page has more errors than an early Mets game.

The 250/8 had a model break in mid 1971 where they stopped using the M114 motors and switched to the same M130 as in the 280 models. This applied to both the coupe and sedan.

Also, they didn't make the 250/8 after the 1972 model year.

-CTH
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-10-2010, 11:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 5,135
If you want to go for a later engine, I have a fuel injected 2.8 M110 engine from a Euro 280SL gathering dust in the back of my garage.
__________________
With best regards

Al
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-11-2010, 12:01 AM
thebenzbar's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: So. Flo.
Posts: 685

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-11-2010, 07:51 PM
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Nicht verantwortlich
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by cth350 View Post

Also, they didn't make the 250/8 after the 1972 model year.

-CTH
I think in England they kept up 250 C / CE sales until 74ish. Thats from the rusty back section of my brain though, I've had a bit to drink after a 10 hour day in 27 degree weather.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-11-2010, 07:55 PM
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Nicht verantwortlich
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 911
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by thebenzbar View Post

I stared at this for almost an hour. It's sublime. I feel like I owe you money now.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-11-2010, 08:00 PM
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Nicht verantwortlich
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 911
Actual Constructive Post (of the three I've made.)

Quote:
Originally Posted by cth350 View Post
visit the vintage forum. There's a live thread by user JiveTurkey about his 250CE restoration
Thx -CTH
Hi, I'm JiveTurkey. If you need pictures of how anything is set up on Wilma feel free to ask. I'll help you out however I can dude. Also, if you do manage to do a Bosch D-jet swap to fuel injection there will officially be enough of us on here (two is enough right?) to start a super (I'd use "uber" but I can't make the U with the dots over it.) exclusive 250CE owners club. There will be beer. Possibly chicks. Groovy times will ensue. Boy, I'm a little off track...

Sidenote; Cth, have you still got those window and sunroof switches?No pressing need for them, just reminding you.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-13-2010, 06:31 PM
cth350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,356
dang you're right. I owe you a set of switches. Sorry about that. -CTH
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-13-2010, 06:32 PM
cth350's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 4,356
oh, and that's nitske's book. It's a good source of incorrect model info.

However, in this case, it might well be right. I just dug out the 1974 Technical Data Manual and it indicates that the 250 and 250C were "current" in 1974.

-CTH

Last edited by cth350; 02-13-2010 at 06:39 PM. Reason: accuracy
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-14-2010, 09:03 AM
JiveTurkey's Avatar
Nicht verantwortlich
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 911
Quote:
Originally Posted by cth350 View Post
dang you're right. I owe you a set of switches. Sorry about that. -CTH
Take your time sir, I'm a long way from needing those switches on a regular basis.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-15-2010, 12:26 AM
ja17's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Blacklick, Ohio
Posts: 238
Hello,

Yes that electronic fuel injected motor is the best powerplant used in those W114 coupes and sedans. Very scarce over here. I owned both the carb version and the "E"version. The "E" is a pleasure to own, perfect hot or cold starts, excellent warm and cold idle, good power, no hesitations, stays in tune. Mercedes replaced this with the M110 double overhead cam injected engine which had only a bit more horsepower, a lot more complication and lot more weight than this "E" motor. ?

I also put many mechanically injected 280SE engines in these W114 coupes and sedans. These M130 injected engines had even more horsepower than the "E" eninge. Turns these cars into AMG style performers. Zero to sixty times of 6 seconds if you pull a little weight off also. Used one to rally years ago. (Chuck's new engine).

Anyway if you do find a "E" engine your biggest challenge would be to transplant the complex wiring harness and brain box to run the electronic injection.

These days if I were doing a transplant, I would use the simple and light M103 engine out of the W124 cars (300E). Lots more power, less weight and simple (single overhead cam six over 200hp). In addition these powerplants are plentiful in the wrecking yards.
__________________
Joe Alexander
Blacklick, Ohio
1964 220SE Rally (La Carrera Panamericana someday)
1966 Unimog 404s (Swedish Army)
1969 300SEL 6.3 (sold)
1969 280SL Pagoda
1973 280SEL 4.5
1974 450SLC FIA Rally car (standard trans)
1982 300D turbo (winter driver)
1986 560SEC
1989 Unimog FLU419 (US Army)
1991 300TE (wife)
2002 SLK 32 AMG (350 hp)

Last edited by ja17; 02-15-2010 at 12:34 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-15-2010, 05:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Carson City, NV
Posts: 3,851
Just a thought. I've often thought about what my W114 would do with a 5.0 HO Ford/T5 swap in it. I think it would be a riot to drive.

__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar.

83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles
08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles
88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:11 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page