|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Anyone here ever actually lose the back on a swing axle car?
"Be careful pushing it on curves with that swing axle" is perhaps repeated often enough that you would think we are driving around in Porsche 911s. I drive with spirit but certainly nowhere near the car's limits, but for those of you who are a bit more fearless, have any of you ever lost the back end in a curve or avoidance maneuver, and what exactly happened if you did?
Even in rain I have never felt like I was going beyond the car's capabilities.
__________________
1962 220SE W111 Coupe, 2nd owner http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../SideSmall.jpg The Coupe Group (W111/112 coupes and cabs) official website The Coupe Group on Facebook MotoArigato: Roadworthy News & Humor |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Decades ago I had a 64 190 fin tail but didn't recall much ill behavior but the bias ply tires gave up pretty easily.
These cars have a low pivot swing axle that holds off the jacking effect a bit longer when cornering hard than high pivot. Just as with the 911 ( tail heavy with much mass hanging rearward of the rear wheels) , the stubborn Germans made the best of a bad situation with low pivot. A VW bug has a high pivot and will tuck the outside wheel under then trip the car. It goes something like this. Car enters right hand corner, body leans left, inside right wheel droops going into positive camber, swing axle pivot rises, outside left wheel starts to lose camber and goes positive. Now the the tire contact patch is much lower than the axle pivot point, cornering forces jack the rear of the car up, sometimes rapidly. This results in a snap loss of traction and the tail comes around. ( there are probably some graphics / vids on the net to explain visually .) I have a 88 Ford Ranger mini truck with a " twin I beam " front suspension ( more or less swing axle with the left axle pivot on the right side and Vs V ) . This was Fords answer to independent front suspension over a solid axle.. . . in 1965. . . The truck will corner pretty well for what it is but when pushed hard, I can feel the front suspension get stiffer and the nose rise. At this point it just under steers / plows forward bleeding speed. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
I once had an old Morris Marina (1.8 super!) that had a rigid rear axle set up. Under normal driving it was absolutely fine. It was so under powered that to do anything really stupid was actually quite difficult...
...however one time whilst taking "evasive action" I got the rear end to get close to a skip and a jump (it was a real 5p => 50p moment)
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
97 SL320: Thanks, that is extremely interesting to me, I appreciate the tutorial! Never fully understood the mechanics vs physics of it all until now.
Stretch: I like your thinking, sometimes low power keeps you out of trouble in the first place!
__________________
1962 220SE W111 Coupe, 2nd owner http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v3.../SideSmall.jpg The Coupe Group (W111/112 coupes and cabs) official website The Coupe Group on Facebook MotoArigato: Roadworthy News & Humor |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I had a 250S(108) while stationed in Germany that I drove VERY fast through windy roads with no hint of trouble. At that time I was uneducated about the swing axle issues so I never even knew.
__________________
Tony H W111 280SE 3.5 Coupe Manual transmission Past cars: Porsche 914 2.0 '64 Jaguar XKE Roadster '57 Oval Window VW '71 Toyota Hilux Pickup Truck-Dad bought new '73 Toyota Celica GT |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Look towards the ends of these videos to see some old Benzes put through their paces:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pbag0dVTLbM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LO10OzJPC3U Couldn't find it but I've seen a video of an old Heckflosse romping through a slalom. Seems the old swing axle cars do alright in curves.
__________________
- Greg - 1973 220D, The Prodigal Benz 1974 240D |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
It seems the center spring would contribute to positive camber and the jacking action since it is trying to push the rear axle halves apart but I think it somehow is supposed to control it.
__________________
Tony H W111 280SE 3.5 Coupe Manual transmission Past cars: Porsche 914 2.0 '64 Jaguar XKE Roadster '57 Oval Window VW '71 Toyota Hilux Pickup Truck-Dad bought new '73 Toyota Celica GT |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I guess you can tow things with this type of axle, but according to CC these were problematic and were done away with:
Cohort Outtake: Towing Fintail Might Get Towed
__________________
Current: 1971 Mercedes Benz 250 (Euro Spec) 1972 Mercedes Benz 250 (US Spec) Past: 1972 Mercedes Benz 280 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Not W116
RE: Cohort Outtake:
The old swing axle rear end was replaced in the W114/W115 chassis, introduced for 1968.
__________________
- Greg - 1973 220D, The Prodigal Benz 1974 240D |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Anyone recall the name of that 70's movie, (clip was posted here a couple of years ago), that had a nice red 108 zooming around a parking garage and smashing into things? Some good swing axle hooning in that one, IIRC.
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Don't know the title. The YouTube user (timothy mayer) who posted that movie took it down a while back. The driver is a "hot" driver guy the bad guys are checking out for a job. Smashing their Benz up in the garage was his way of showing them he was a good driver. At least that's how I remember it.
__________________
- Greg - 1973 220D, The Prodigal Benz 1974 240D |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Dad's 1971 280SL could easily get sideways with some speed and some slaloms. 'Twas fun!
__________________
- Brian 1989 500SEL Euro 1966 250SE Cabriolet 1958 BMW Isetta 600 |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Have a look on the Internet Movie Car Database web site, it shows lots of cars and movies.
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Its only the old high pivot swing axels that could lead to some disasterous handling issues, especially in high performance cars that were more likely to be driven in a spirited fashion. Like the 300SL Gullwing Mercedes. You really had to know what you were doing to drive those cars hard through the turns.
That changed with the first roadster versions of the 300SL starting in 1958, while the other more mundane sedans continued with the old style axel for some years to come. I'm not sure when all Mercedes cars switched over to low pivot design, but I'm thinking 1965 with the introduction of the 108 chassis. Any comments on which Mercedes cars were the last ones to use the old high pivot axel design?
__________________
Berfinroy in CT Present vehicles: 1973 300 SEL 4.5 1959 Rolls Royce Silver Cloud I 1959 Ford Thunderbird convertible/430 Past vehicles; 1958 Bentley S 1 1976 ex-Max Hoffman 6.9 1970 300SEL 2.8 1958 Jaguar MK IX 1961 Jaguar MK IX 1963 Jaguar E-type factory special roadster 1948 Plymouth woody 1955 Morgan plus 4 1966 Shelby GT350H Mustang |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
The first mercedes cars to use the low pivot swing axle were the W180 and W120 sedans around 1955. Most of their models followed suit including the 190SL, the 300SL roadster, the heckflosse/fintail sedans and coupes, the W100 grosser, the W113 roadsters, and the W108/W109 sedans. The W108/W109 models were the last mercdes benz cars to have the low pivot swing axles, with exception of the W100 which was made in small numbers for the rest of the world up until about 1980. Mercedes introduced a trailing arm rear suspension with the introduction of the W114/W115 models in 1968. This system was used with some slight modifications on the W107/W116/W123/W126 models right up through the last W126 in 1991.
Last edited by 68_280SE; 09-04-2015 at 07:33 AM. |
Bookmarks |
|
|