Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Vintage Mercedes Forum

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-18-2003, 12:07 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: suburb of Chicago
Posts: 163
w108/109 vs w123 vs w124 vs w116 vs w126

Although I might be comparing apples to oranges to grapes, I am trying to see which series are peoples'favorites and why?

w108/109- classic benz, very stately

w 123 surprisingly elegant if not overlooked series

w124 a future classic?

w116 advanced at its introduction

w126 the classic and the epitome of the S car? beautiful proportion

I guess my favorite would be the w108/109 although for daily us it would be a toss up between the w123 and w126

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-18-2003, 04:34 AM
Manya
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I prefer the 108 design. As it is easy to work with, and also has a very stylish exterior. it's also indistructable
Only bad thing about them is they rust badly if not treated well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-18-2003, 03:38 PM
300SDog's Avatar
gimme a low-tech 240D
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: central ky
Posts: 3,602
Not just styling but restoration/maintenance capabilities is what defines "classic cars" as most vintage fans restore their own cars, learning as they go along.

Old world, hand built cars can easily be restored and serviced by their owners...... newer cars dont provide that option.

Am working with 123 diesels at this time.... would rather be working on 110's.... and cant imagine working with 124's and 126's - for the simple reason that fewer and fewer DIY capabilities exist on newer cars.

What role do all those millions of vacuum lines and tricky electronic devices serve in appreciation of vintage cars?

If something cant be easily identified or understood under the hood of my car - i dont want it.

Nightmare restoration items like "climate control" and "central locking" just dont have a place in restoration/appreciation of vintage automobiles. These are fun items to have (when working)...... but most people would rather discard them entirely, or upgrade to previous manual systems when the new-fangled devices fail.

Its not a money game - where collectors just dump dollars into finding someone else to repair/restore their classic cars..... its actually the pleasure of knowing and understanding everything about the machine itself..... doing the work...and spending thousands of hours on the car that draws the hobbyist.
__________________
'80 300SD/ w116
'79 240D 4-spd
'71 750cc Guzzi

previously owned:

'83 240D 4-spd
'77 280SEL 4-spd
'74 280/8
'72 250/8
'65 220Sb 4-spd
'63 220Sb 4-spd
'63 190c 4-spd
'61 220Sb 4-spd
'60 190b 4-spd

Last edited by 300SDog; 05-18-2003 at 03:46 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-18-2003, 10:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
My W108 gets the most use, the W126 (my brother's 300SDL) is probably the nicest all round, and the W124 is a blast, but somehow isn't as fun to drive as the W108.

Can't beat the 300D for a long trip -- set the cruise at 80 and point -- but the W108 is a whole lot more fun to drive. Power is about the same, but I like the W108 more.

Painted the hood yesterday -- color is off, but at least it's blue and not yellow now!

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-19-2003, 02:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Raleigh, NC currently residing in KL, Malaysia
Posts: 460
Hello,
If I had a choice, it would have to be a W111 coupe or a W113 SL, with a W124 daily driver.
I have a question for the W108/109 owners (or any pre-1970s Benz for that matter, except114/115)on this forum.
Are you guys greasing the 26 grease points every 3000 miles?
The *older* cars maybe simpler, but they do require more maintainence.
Have a good week.
__________________
Nachi11744
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-19-2003, 06:42 AM
300SDog's Avatar
gimme a low-tech 240D
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: central ky
Posts: 3,602
I didnt mean to sound derogatory in my last post.... am now in the process of disarming leaky central locking system in my other 123.

Hell, I'd probably be ripping out all kinds of stuff in the newer models when they reach the 20 yr. age that I'm accustomed to owning as daily drivers, scavenger that I am.

This might sound pitiful.... but dream car for me would be pre-'65 190D - from the era when MB owned the taxi cab industry worldwide. That would be something that could be souped up with "S" class interior wood and leather seats. Have also been told the 240 engine will fit.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-19-2003, 02:54 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Phoenix Arizona. Ex Durban R.S.A.
Posts: 6,104
Luv em all!

Up to the 140 that is. Not too fond of the 124 but pretty much any sedan before that is my thing. I'm unusual I guess in that I've never appreciated sports cars even though I know the SL's are great cars for their type. I like em big.

My 108 was still my favourite Mercedes. One of the things I liked most about it was the way I could use the kickdown feature (coupled with judicious observation of the traffic lights) to get the jump on the car's next to me at the light, and then let up on the gas slightly at just the right time to achieve an almost slingshot effect from 1st to 2nd which would propel me way in front of most other cars and I was usually still in front (even if only just) by the time the next set of lights came up.

It was always cool to see quizzical looks from other drivers wondering just what was under the hood of the old Benz. But it was never anything other than the stock standard 2.8 six with twin zeniths and an auto tranny.

Of course when several lights were green in a row my bluff was called, but usually stop and go was a lot of fun.

Truthfully though, ANY Mercedes is better than none. Trust me I'm speaking from bitter experience!

- Peter.
__________________
2021 Chevrolet Spark
Formerly...
2000 GMC Sonoma
1981 240D 4spd stick. 347000 miles. Deceased Feb 14 2021
2002 Kia Rio. Worst crap on four wheels
1981 240D 4spd stick. 389000 miles.
1984 123 200
1979 116 280S
1972 Cadillac Sedan DeVille
1971 108 280S
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-19-2003, 07:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: suburb of Chicago
Posts: 163
Hell, I'd probably be ripping out all kinds of stuff in the newer models when they reach the 20 yr. age that I'm accustomed to owning as daily drivers, scavenger that I am.


I agree with dieseldog..i feel sorry for the owner of the current S class when things like the airconditioned seats go bad..ouch

I like the w108 the most..
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-19-2003, 07:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
Yes, I grease every so often (not exactly 3000 miles, but then I'm using synthetic grease, too). Currently the zerk fittings on the lower control arms are winning -- can't seem to get enough grease in there, will try again tonight while I'm evacuating the AC again (bad shraeder valves last night).

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-19-2003, 09:00 PM
engatwork's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Soperton, Ga. USA
Posts: 13,667
I like the 123's for right now. Anyway, I'm sitting here trying to imagine 25+ years from now ripping out all the non-working electronics from a 2000 model year S500 and trying to make it work LOL - fat chance. The reason I say "non-working" is because of the "non-working" tachs and cruise controls that I see nowadays in the 123 diesels. As far as I am concerned one of the BEST MB's I have ever messed around with was a 1959 220S with a manual transmission on the column. I had a chance to purchase a good running, no rust example back around 1984 for $3500 and I didn't - I kinda regret it now.
__________________
Jim
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-19-2003, 11:31 PM
Aaron's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: Cincinnati, Ohio
Posts: 1,937
W108/109: Great fun and can be used daily if you're (a.) willing to put up with old car maintenance and (b.) live in a dry climate such as California or Arizona. Very safe automobiles but many require extensive work these days due to age and mileage. I have seen very few of these cars that don't need any front end work, for example.

W116: MB's greatest driving S-Class IMHO. Very well balanced. The W116 gives you a classic feelng coupled with modern driveability. Problems? RUST! RUST! RUST!

W123: Wonderful daily drivers. Built like a brick privy and stand up to years of daily "abuse" without making much of a fuss. Nice styling (very classic) but not one of my favorites to drive. I can't ever seem to get comfortable in one.

W124: Another great daily driver. Modern and sporty. A little boring in the styling department but hey, weren't most cars of the mid-to-late '80s boring?!?! You begin to get into complex repairs on these cars (especially the last of the 1990s models) but the 500E is affectionately referred to as the "Velvet Hammer" and is the grandchild of the M-100 powered Mercs (6.3 and 6.9).

W126: Can't be beat for 1980s luxury and roadworthiness. Very comfortable and the last of them (1991s) are wonderful. They don't suffer from rust like W116s do and the components are still made well. My '83 300SD has 253K on the ticker and is still going like a champ! Not many complex repairs here but climate control and central locking can bewilder some inexperienced mechanics.

What would my ideal daily driver be? Hands down it would be an M-100. If I lived in LA or somewhere with similar weather, my 6.3 and 6.9 would see daily action.
__________________
Regards,
Aaron
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-20-2003, 01:18 PM
Regular User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Flyover State
Posts: 1,364
Quote:
Are you guys greasing the 26 grease points every 3000 miles?
Actually the manual for the 220S says grease every 1,900 miles, but I do it about every oil change.
__________________
63 220S W111
76 300D W115
2013 VW JSW TDI M6

previously-
73 280 SEL 4.5
86 300E 5 speed
2010 VW Jetta TDI M6
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-20-2003, 11:56 PM
Limited Edition's Avatar
190E LimitedEdition Owner
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Virginia Beach, Va
Posts: 1,036
I like the W124 becasue it is handsome, modern (abs, airbags, etc.) and reliable. I haven't driven any of the rest except for the W126 but like all Mercedes and I plan to drive the others when I get a chance.
__________________
http://www.benzworld.org/forums/imag...e_steering.gif
1998 C43 ///AMG
1999 C230 Custom 5-Speed Manual
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-21-2003, 04:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: Fl
Posts: 140
Smile w124

i've had all but the w116 and I will have to stick with the w124 for its overall integrity, smooth driving, quite interior, good acceleration ('86 300E), nice selection of features, and styling.

The w126 is very nice but too heavy and sort of feels like a boat because of its size (300SDL). I consider them a class apart from the earlier models you chose. Both the w124/26 are just a leap forward in refinement towards what modern models are today. Don't get me wrong the earlier models do have their merits.

I love the w123, my first benz ('79 280E) beautiful car, simple yet had all the features modern cars are still missing (mine had PW, PDL, Sunroof, climate control, leather, etc.).

Then there is the w108 ('72 280E), which feels surprisingly similar to the w123, and that is why I say they are different from the w124/26. They are classy and ours has all the amenities also of modern cars (and all still work), plus all the wood and polished metal detail you cant find today. But it does feel old, is not as quiet as the newer models, nor fast and as solid.

my .02
__________________
'02 C240
'00 LR Discovery
'72 280SE
'67 280SL

---past---

'79 280E sold (RIP)
'86 300E sold
'87 300SDL sold
'90 Laforza sold
'95 320SE sold
'98 ML 320 (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-21-2003, 06:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: suburb of Chicago
Posts: 163
I think the older models( w108/109) dont have the chasis siftness which the more modern cars have therefore they arent as quiet and rigid feeling.
My only gripe about the more modern cars are that they have become very complex especially the more optioned out ones.
Our 98 E320 has the right side mirror tilting down each time the car goes it reverse..a nice feature but is it truly necessary, one more thing to break and need fixing in the future.
The newer cars however are more environmentally sound.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page