|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
HP4 716(Kumho) or Avid V4S(Yokohama)?
Kumhos were great and lasted -- 15,000 miles. They will be prorated under the 50kmi warranty.
Should I replace them with same, or try the V4S (60kmi warranty)? The E420 gets new tires every 15 to 20kmi. Weight, torque and my driving (mostly city) does not seem to make for long lasting tires. I have been very happy with the Kumhos except for the sidewall looks. Also, I had them in 225/55/16 - which seemed to work well.
__________________
2008 S550 2010 GLK350 1997 E420 (retired) 2005 CLK500 (retired) |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
in your condition I would not be happy with the Kumho's ... and I like the Avid V4S better anyhow
__________________
Please, call me to place orders or for more info use my name for on-line orders |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
at lukes suggestion, i have replaced dunlops[15k] with the yoko avid v4s. on my 1997 s500c.
quiet, accurate handling, good braking. now, if they will just provide better durability. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
my kumho ectsa hp4 develpoped temp-dependent dimples on 2 tires' sidewall.I did not return them as argument would likely follow with the shop whether that is
(1) even visible (2)even important. Naturally, i would not be buying Kumhos ever again.
__________________
Tom 2010 C250 4-matic Sport (Canada) |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|