Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Mercedes-Benz Wheels & Tires

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-04-2002, 04:30 PM
brookspw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 551
Question Who has 205/60/15 on their 190?

I am running the standard wheel size with 185/65/15 on the car now.

Some folks tell me that 205/60 is too tall, they'll rub. What has been your experience?

The numbers say that the 205 is 1/2" taller than the 195/60 and the section width is 8.2" vs 7.9" on the 195.

My issue is that the 185/65 are 24.4 tall and I do NOT want to get shorter tires. If anything, I'd one day like to lower it a little bit. The last thing I want is for the wheel well to appear even emptier. So, 205/60 is .2 taller than 185/65.

1. Did/do they rub on your car?

2. If so, where? (strut, fender, etc.)

Someone who has actually had them on their car, I would value your opinion/experience. In retrospect, what is your recommendation on size?

I want to get the Dunlop Sport A2.

Thank you very much,

brookspw

__________________
1994 C280, dark green metallic
105k miles

1991 190E 2.6, Black
191,500 miles
(sold to another forum member)

2003 Chevy Tahoe LT, Redfire Metallic
105k miles

1989 Mustang GT Cobra Convertible
43k miles

Last edited by brookspw; 12-04-2002 at 10:23 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-04-2002, 07:17 PM
vanakin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hello,

I don't have the exact tire you mentioned but I have 195/65/15 tires on my 190E and I can't wait for the tires to wear out, I'm going back to the regular size, there is a lot of rubbing if you hit dips or bumps in the road or if you corner. It only seems to happen in the front but this might be bcuz I have no weight in the back at all.

I'm not sure exactly what the tire is rubbing against, it might be the grey rubber under the fender, but it's very irritating and I get the feeling I might damage something, although on the side of vanity, they look a lot better and fill up the wheel wells.

If you have to get different tires, I would suggest the 195s, you just have to be careful around dips, bumps and do not corner too fast at speeds over 45mph.

I don't know much about tires but if the tires I have are too tall for my car I would think the 205s would be even taller and you mentioned they are in your post.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-04-2002, 08:13 PM
brookspw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 551
Well, Vanakin, I appreciate the reply, but the 195/65 is the TALLEST of all the tires I mentioned. Your tires are indeed too tall for the wheel well. I'm looking to go a tad wider at the same, or just a tad less, height.
__________________
1994 C280, dark green metallic
105k miles

1991 190E 2.6, Black
191,500 miles
(sold to another forum member)

2003 Chevy Tahoe LT, Redfire Metallic
105k miles

1989 Mustang GT Cobra Convertible
43k miles
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-04-2002, 09:00 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 1999
Location: ajax, ontario, canada
Posts: 773
a 205/60-15 tire has a diameter that is less than 1% bigger than a 185-65-15 tire. A 195/65-15 tire is about 2% taller than standard.

on my car, the 205/60-15 rubs a little on the leading edge of the front wheelwells, but that is only because I am using a wider wheel with a different offset (7" wide with 36mm offset)

i believe that the 205/60-15 is the ideal upgrade for you. I don't want really low-profile tires because I don't want to fear potholes, or going over bumps at high speed.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-04-2002, 10:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: LEMONT-CHICAGO
Posts: 412
I'm running 195\60\15 and they are almost exactly the same height as the 185\65\15. I compared them side by side. I had 205\65\15 and they did not rub at all but the accelleration was a little off because it changed the overall gear ratio with the taller tires. The 195\60\15 do not rub. If your car is lowered it it possible. I replaced all 4 coil springs 3 years ago and it performs flawlessly. Also don't buy cheap tires like BF Goodrich or Pep Boys , you WILL notice the difference from a quality tire like Michelin in the ride and especially in the handling.
__________________
1990 190E 2.6
1996 Grand Voyager 3.3
1985 Mustang GT 5.0 5 SPD
1982 Suzuki GS 750T
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-05-2002, 11:14 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Saugus, CA USA
Posts: 2,042
I put them on mine and the only real problem was rubbing on the front of the front fenders when I hit deep dips. I rolled that part back so it rarely happens now.

A non-real problem is it won't fit is the spare hole in the trunk
__________________
5 speed '91 190E 2.6 320,000 mi. (new car, fast, smooth as silk six, couldn't find any more Peugeots)
5 speed '85 Peugeot 505 2.5l Turbo Diesel 266,000 mi. (old car, fast for a diesel, had 2 others)
5 speed '01 Jetta V6 (new wifes car, pretty quick)
5 speed '85 Peugeot 505 2.2l Turbo Gas 197,000 mi. (wifes car, faster, sadly gone just short of 200k )
5 speed '83 Yamaha 750 Maxim 14,000 mi. (fastest)
0 speed 4' x 8' 1800 lb Harbor Freight utility trailer (only as fast as what's pulling it)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-05-2002, 12:54 PM
brookspw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 551
Didn't think of that, Jim. But I'll just keep the same OEM spare.

Have you had both 195/60 and 205/60 on the car? If so, which did you prefer, and for what reasons?

Thanks,
__________________
1994 C280, dark green metallic
105k miles

1991 190E 2.6, Black
191,500 miles
(sold to another forum member)

2003 Chevy Tahoe LT, Redfire Metallic
105k miles

1989 Mustang GT Cobra Convertible
43k miles
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-05-2002, 01:51 PM
jfujimoto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I had 205/60/15 MXV4's on my 190E with OE 15-hole chrome rims that were 15x6.5 with an offset of 49. That combination was perfect.

Now I've got the 205/60/15 MXV4's on 15x7 monoblock replicas with an offset of 37. There is rubbing only when the car hits a pronounced bump or dip on a slow turn. I might try 205/55/15 or 205/50/15 once the Michelins wear out.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-05-2002, 04:03 PM
vanakin
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Hey Brook,

Thanks for the correction but I was wondering how come the 195/65s that I have are taller than the 205/60, what is used to indicate the height, is it the second number(65) and not the first?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-05-2002, 05:24 PM
jfujimoto
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Yes.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-06-2002, 09:28 AM
jsmith's Avatar
Ronin
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: At Sea
Posts: 1,729
the second number is the "aspect ratio" which is a percentage of the cross sectional width of the tire giving the height of the sidewall. a 195/65 is always taller than a 195/60...
__________________
joE
1993 300e-2.8
- gone now <sigh>
"Do not adjust your mind, it's reality that's malfunctioning"
http://banners.wunderground.com/bann...L/Key_West.gif
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-08-2002, 10:15 PM
brookspw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 551
bump
__________________
1994 C280, dark green metallic
105k miles

1991 190E 2.6, Black
191,500 miles
(sold to another forum member)

2003 Chevy Tahoe LT, Redfire Metallic
105k miles

1989 Mustang GT Cobra Convertible
43k miles
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-12-2002, 03:51 AM
azhari
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Talking Tire Size

I am running 195/60/15 on my 1991 190e 1.8 with 8 hole Merc rims.

I like the feel of the ride and handling and have not experienced any rubbing.

However, if your wife or g/friend drives your car, you may wanna have the 205/60/15 (wider profile) so if she kerbs the car, the rims will not hurt.



Azhari
1991 190e 1.8
Singapore
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-12-2002, 09:55 AM
brookspw's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 551
Ok, thanks for the replies. Looks like the 195/60 are good to go unanimously.

For those that have had the 205/60, please respond with:
1) Did they rub & where/when.
2) How was the appearance vs. 195?

I need to get some tires soooooon. My wet traction is gone.

Thanks,

Phillip
__________________
1994 C280, dark green metallic
105k miles

1991 190E 2.6, Black
191,500 miles
(sold to another forum member)

2003 Chevy Tahoe LT, Redfire Metallic
105k miles

1989 Mustang GT Cobra Convertible
43k miles
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-12-2002, 11:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: South Eastern, MA
Posts: 1,743
brookspw,

I used to have an 84 190E which I lowered 1" using H&R Lowering springs and had Koni Adjustables shocks on the stiffest setting. I also upgraded sway bars and had a set of 15" OZ Racing Wheels. The tire size I used were a 205/60/15 but I don't remember the offset.

The rear tires fit perfectly and there was no rubbing whatsoever. The front tires did however hit the front fenders during extreme bumps and dips. Personally it really wasn't a big deal, it left scratches near the edge of the tires where the sidewall met the tread. You might be able to solve this by rolling your fenders.

I don't however know how well these tires would fit on a stock rim, are you planning on upgrading or do you already have upgraded wheels?

__________________
Afshin

Current:
02 C32 AMG

Previous:
92 500E
84 190E 2.3 5 Spd
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page