Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-21-2004, 12:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 218
What is the best year for an S class diesel

I have a 1983 300SD. I Love the car and it only has 284,000 miles. I am going to keep it. I want to add a 90's S class diesel to my stable. Can anyone pinpoint the best and worst years for this model during the 90's so I can start looking. Thank you - Dennis

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-21-2004, 01:01 PM
Rick Miley's Avatar
Spark Free
 
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Land O Lakes, FL
Posts: 3,086
Well, there are two different chassis. 1990-1991 would be W126, while 1992-1999 would be W140. All of them in the U.S. have the 3.5 liter engine known as the "rod bender." Not exactly a good choice. Plus the early years of the W140 had terrible chassis problems as well.

If you want a later diesel, a 1998 or 1999 E300 Turbodiesel would be a much safer choice than any S class.
__________________
Rick Miley
2014 Tesla Model S
2018 Tesla Model 3
2017 Nissan LEAF
Former MB: 99 E300, 86 190E 2.3, 87 300E, 80 240D, 82 204D Euro
Chain Elongation References
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-21-2004, 01:28 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
There all expensive to maintain. I would say that a 350SDL with an updated engine would be the way to go. I have heard of to many expensive things breaking on the W140.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-21-2004, 02:41 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 218
What years were the 350SDL manufactured?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-21-2004, 03:05 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,843
Available in the US in 90 and 91.

BTW, the bestest S-class Diesel is an 87 300SDL

Sixto
95 S420
87 300SDL
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-21-2004, 05:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
I personally love the style of the W140 and would have bought one already if it weren't for the rod-bending that I read about. Instead I have a W124 diesel which is a nice style too and more sporty, but less presidential looking.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-21-2004, 06:51 PM
Plantman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Miami
Posts: 2,133
Diesel Addict....I have been trying to come up with term for the way the SDL's look and Presidential fits the bill. Just something about it.

Thanks
__________________
Enough about me, how are you doing?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-21-2004, 07:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Az
Posts: 79
If you don't like the S class in those year/chassis take a look at the E 300 D. My 95 w/124 is agreat ride with a chassis that's been around awhile. Find one and drive it - the pick up is very good and I'm getting about 33 mpg - cruising at 80+ is wonderful. It's my wifes car and I'm looking for another same year model fo myself.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-21-2004, 08:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 21
As for the Pre-1992 Mercedes Diesels, the best ones are the 4 & 5 cyl models. The 6 cyl models (eg late 300/350s) are the 'rod benders'. This is pretty alarming, considering it's a Mercedes engine!!
__________________
Nothing sounds as great as a Diesel!!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-21-2004, 08:42 PM
Registered Diesel Burner
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,911
It's strange that you should ask. 1983 is the best year.

You know that saying about "the grass is always greener on the other side of the fence".

Ken300D
__________________
--------------------------
1982 300D at 351K miles
1984 300SD at 217K miles
1987 300D at 370K miles
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-21-2004, 09:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 21
Why is a 1983 300SD better than a 1984 model?
__________________
Nothing sounds as great as a Diesel!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-21-2004, 09:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally posted by Plantman
Diesel Addict....I have been trying to come up with term for the way the SDL's look and Presidential fits the bill. Just something about it.
Thanks
You're welcome. I used to have an 87 420SEL which is the same body as your SDL. My co-workers were saying all I needed to do to the car is put a flag on both front corners. This car was a gasser and a money bucket though and it didn't quite grow on me as my diesels did.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-21-2004, 09:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,220
Quote:
Originally posted by merouby
As for the Pre-1992 Mercedes Diesels, the best ones are the 4 & 5 cyl models. The 6 cyl models (eg late 300/350s) are the 'rod benders'. This is pretty alarming, considering it's a Mercedes engine!!
NO, NO, NO!

There is almost nothing wrong with the later 3.0 liter six cylinder engine! Just some weak head designs. But if you never overheat them, they shouldn't give you problems(mine is original nearing 300K).

They also are easier to start in the winter.

That being said, the ones you shouldn't worry about at all are the 4 + 5 cylinder models(early eighties). They have no design flaws whatsoever.

---I do own a 350, but its on its second engine which has tougher connecting rods. 350's are the second rarest W126(next to the 560SE), and to find one with the second engine done makes them even rarer.

Sorry, if I sounded harsh.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000)

1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000)

1978 Porsche 924 (99000)

1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-21-2004, 09:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 709
Quote:
There all expensive to maintain. I would say that a 350SDL with an updated engine would be the way to go. I have heard of to many expensive things breaking on the W140.
If you can find a 140 that has been well taken care of...a one owner dealer serviced vehicle...you will buy a car that you will love to drive everyday...a marvel of engineering, in my opinion
One that has most of the latest safety features, an incredible ride, an intensely incredible stereo system and a level of quietness far ahead of the 126 car it replaced


Warren
1992 300SD 175K
Columbus Ohio
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-21-2004, 09:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 21
No worries - I stand corrected. So the six-cyl 3.0 has a weak head design, while the 350 has the weak-head design AND rod bending reputation. That's more alarming. I'd still rather have the 5-cyl model I suppose.

__________________
Nothing sounds as great as a Diesel!!
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page