Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-25-2004, 10:57 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading-England
Posts: 116
603 Rough idle

My newly purchased 300D (non turbo) sometimes has a very rough idle and I'm wondering if this has something to do with the actual idling rev's...is my car meant to idle at 500rpm?....this seems very low, and it does feel as if the car is on the verge of stalling.

If this is too low, how do you increase the idle rev's

Other than the idle, the cars seems to be going well apart from some noise from one of the lifters, which I assume I will have to live with.

Car is doing 36mpg (imperial), so I guess thats about 38-39mpg (US Gallons) on 80mph runs....is this a reasonable figure or should I be expecting more?

Many thanks

__________________
Current Mercs
R129 1994 300-24SL
W124 320E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 350bhp

Previous Mercs
W124 1986 Quad Cam AMG Hammer, 45,000 miles
W124 300E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 320bhp
W124 E500
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-25-2004, 11:06 AM
rdanz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladamir
My newly purchased 300D (non turbo) sometimes has a very rough idle and I'm wondering if this has something to do with the actual idling rev's...is my car meant to idle at 500rpm?....this seems very low, and it does feel as if the car is on the verge of stalling.

If this is too low, how do you increase the idle rev's

Other than the idle, the cars seems to be going well apart from some noise from one of the lifters, which I assume I will have to live with.

Car is doing 36mpg (imperial), so I guess thats about 38-39mpg (US Gallons) on 80mph runs....is this a reasonable figure or should I be expecting more?

Many thanks
Try using synthetic oil next time you change oil if you not allready helps with lifter noise.
Also a can of Lubromoly Diesel Purge may help the rough idle follow can directions.
Your fuel milage sound unbelieveable are you sure>

Last edited by rdanz; 09-25-2004 at 03:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-25-2004, 11:17 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 270
Being a right hand drive car, I would assume that the electro adjustment knob would be on the other side on my car from yours.

Anyway, I'll describe based on my car. Located near the master brake cylinder, attatched to the firewall, there is a black colored knob with numbers printed in white. This is where I understand idol adjustments are made, at least on my US model 87 300D turbo.

GSXR has posted some info recently about this adjustment. Try the search and see what you may find.

Steve.........
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-25-2004, 11:18 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading-England
Posts: 116
I have looked for Luro-Moly Diesel Purge in the UK and it appears that Lubro Moly do not sell their products over here....shame!...are there alternative makes to Lubro Moly I could try?

Fuel consumption is correct, on my last trip I got 36.55mpg and trip before that 36.32mpg......figures were checked after a brimming the fuel tank after each fill.
__________________
Current Mercs
R129 1994 300-24SL
W124 320E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 350bhp

Previous Mercs
W124 1986 Quad Cam AMG Hammer, 45,000 miles
W124 300E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 320bhp
W124 E500
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-25-2004, 12:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
Milage is about right.

Your electronic idle speed control is not working, idle should be 650-750 rpm and not change when you have the AC on or in gear with automatic (which I presume you don't have).

This is usually a broken wire at the three-wire connector at the back of the pump. They are at an bad angle and tend to fatigue. It could also be a major failure in the pump, in which case I'd leave it and live with it (you can set the mechanical idle up, but I don't know how!) until you need other IP work, it's very expensive on this pump.

You also very likely have collapsed engine mounts. Take a look at them and see how much space there is between the widest portion and the frame -- should be at least 25 mm, and you just be able to see the trapezoidal steel fitting on the bottom. If closer (they can actually touch) or if the steel portion has been pushed up into the mount, they have leaked out. The result is VERY rough idle and considerably more engine noise than you should have.

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 09-25-2004, 03:56 PM
rdanz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,158
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladamir
I have looked for Luro-Moly Diesel Purge in the UK and it appears that Lubro Moly do not sell their products over here....shame!...are there alternative makes to Lubro Moly I could try?

Fuel consumption is correct, on my last trip I got 36.55mpg and trip before that 36.32mpg......figures were checked after a brimming the fuel tank after each fill.
See if you can get Redline products.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 09-26-2004, 01:50 AM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Do you use imperial gallons or US gallons in the UK? Maybe the fuel mileage numbers should be adjusted for comparison to US numbers. But those are fabulous numbers in any case.

Sixto
95 S420
87 300SDL
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 09-26-2004, 10:49 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
Sixto:

Those would be Imperial gallons, 5 US quarts instead of 4 (because the Imperial Quart is 20 oz, not 16).

Multiply by 0.8 to get milage in US gallons, still pretty good.

I used to get a kick out of the Canadians telling me how cheap US gasoline was when I was living in Sault Ste. Marie, Ontario -- they were converting Imperial gallons to liters (4.2 L per gallon) rather than US gallons (3.7 L per gallon) -- I figured you would have to buy 50 gallons to pay for the bridge toll at the one time rate, 25 gal at the "buy a book of ten" rate to pay for the difference.

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 09-26-2004, 11:12 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by psfred
Sixto:

Those would be Imperial gallons, 5 US quarts instead of 4 (because the Imperial Quart is 20 oz, not 16).

Multiply by 0.8 to get milage in US gallons, still pretty good.
Peter,

The Imperial gallon is larger than the U.S. gallon. So, you can go further on an Imperial gallon. You therefore would multiply by 1.20 when you have the mileage in Imperial gallons and you wish to get the mileage in U.S. gallons.

With this conversion, his fuel economy really looks amazing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 09-26-2004, 06:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Evansville, Indiana
Posts: 8,150
Almost as amazing as magic, as it would be. The US gallon is smaller, so less miles per gallon (29 or thereabouts). You have the correct ratio, but upside down (you would need to divide by 1.2 rather than multiply).

The difference is confusing, as there are four Imperial quarts (and 8 Imperial pints) per gallon. The Pint, however, is defined as 20 oz. in Imperial measure, not 16 oz as in US measure (for reasons I probably don't want to know!). A pint in an English Pub is 20 oz, in the US it will be 16. The result is that the US gallon is somewhat smaller, as are our pints and quarts. Imperial quarts are larger than a liter, US quarts are smaller.

Peter
__________________
1972 220D ?? miles
1988 300E 200,012
1987 300D Turbo killed 9/25/07, 275,000 miles
1985 Volvo 740 GLE Turobodiesel 218,000
1972 280 SE 4.5 165, 000 - It runs!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 09-26-2004, 10:25 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
How in the hell...........

did I screw that up?

I think I need to retire from this engineering business.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 09-27-2004, 08:23 AM
TonyFromWestOz's Avatar
"The Wizard of Oz"
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 834
Quote:
Originally Posted by psfred
Almost as amazing as magic, as it would be. The US gallon is smaller, so less miles per gallon (29 or thereabouts). You have the correct ratio, but upside down (you would need to divide by 1.2 rather than multiply).

The difference is confusing, as there are four Imperial quarts (and 8 Imperial pints) per gallon. The Pint, however, is defined as 20 oz. in Imperial measure, not 16 oz as in US measure (for reasons I probably don't want to know!). A pint in an English Pub is 20 oz, in the US it will be 16. The result is that the US gallon is somewhat smaller, as are our pints and quarts. Imperial quarts are larger than a liter, US quarts are smaller.

Peter
But a litre or liter is tha same size everywhere, just like a metre, a gramme or a degree C.
Apart from us "old farts" not being able to learn the new measurements, why does UK and USA continue to use these antiquated measurements which are different even from each other's measurements? The conversion cost is small due to the planned obsolescence of all items madethese days.
__________________
Tony from West Oz.
Fatmobile 3 84 300D 295kkm Silver grey/Blue int. 2 tank WVO - Recipient of TurboDesel engine.
Josephine '82 300D 390kkm White/Palamino int.
Elizabeth '81 280E, sporting a '79 300D engine.
Lucille '87 W124 300D non-turbo 6 cylinder OM603, Pearl Grey with light grey interior


Various parts cars including 280E, 230C & 300D in various states of disassembly.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 09-27-2004, 12:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading-England
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by sixto
Do you use imperial gallons or US gallons in the UK? Maybe the fuel mileage numbers should be adjusted for comparison to US numbers. But those are fabulous numbers in any case.

Sixto
95 S420
87 300SDL
I just realised that I stuffed up on my Maths..........if I'm getting 36mpg (imperial), then this should equate to 31-32mpg (US Gallon)..... :p
__________________
Current Mercs
R129 1994 300-24SL
W124 320E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 350bhp

Previous Mercs
W124 1986 Quad Cam AMG Hammer, 45,000 miles
W124 300E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 320bhp
W124 E500
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 09-27-2004, 12:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Reading-England
Posts: 116
Quote:
Originally Posted by TonyFromWestOz
But a litre or liter is tha same size everywhere, just like a metre, a gramme or a degree C.
Apart from us "old farts" not being able to learn the new measurements, why does UK and USA continue to use these antiquated measurements which are different even from each other's measurements? The conversion cost is small due to the planned obsolescence of all items madethese days.
Tony you should try living over here...bloody nightmare when it comes to using imperial and metric.

Since the mid 70's all school kids, me included, have been taught in metric which I naturally much prefer.

However, the UK still persists in using imperial for all manner of things, so we end up with people always quoting temperatures in Fahrenheit which means nothing to me, working in Pounds and Ounces....never ever understood this at all ....Kg's and gramms are way simpler.

Distances in terms of metres and Cm's much easier than inches, however, when it comes to bigger distances I'm still a Miles person...same when it comes to speed, although KM's are pretty easy to convert to.

I still like gallons when its comes to working out MPG and have to convert from Litres to gallons, however, when it comes to buying a quantity of fluid I prefer to work in Litres .....confused, you should be

I would rather they just bit the bullet once and for all and converted over to Metric, seeing as every school kid has been taught it for almost the last 30 years!

As for driving on the right, well there's a whole new subject
__________________
Current Mercs
R129 1994 300-24SL
W124 320E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 350bhp

Previous Mercs
W124 1986 Quad Cam AMG Hammer, 45,000 miles
W124 300E Turbo Technics Twin Turbo 320bhp
W124 E500
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 09-27-2004, 06:57 PM
phantoms's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Savannah, GA
Posts: 794
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vladamir
As for driving on the right, well there's a whole new subject
Drive on the "Right" side of the road, not the "wrong".

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page