Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-28-2006, 04:35 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 101
why is diesel cancerous and gas not?

wondering.

__________________
1980 300D.

120,000
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-28-2006, 04:56 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Because diesels put out more "visible" particulates than gas engines. Those particles settle in the lungs when drawn in from breathing, just like cigarette smoke, and causes cancer over time. The finer the particles, the higher the risk.

Gas engines running properly put out very few solid particulates. That's why some states say they are not "cancerous" like Diesels. At least in Kalifornia, Maine, Massachusetts, New York and Vermont.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-28-2006, 08:21 AM
Diesel Giant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Loganville/Atlanta
Posts: 2,156
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction
Because diesels put out more "visible" particulates than gas engines. Those particles settle in the lungs when drawn in from breathing, just like cigarette smoke, and causes cancer over time. The finer the particles, the higher the risk.

Gas engines running properly put out very few solid particulates. That's why some states say they are not "cancerous" like Diesels. At least in Kalifornia, Maine, Massachusetts, New York and Vermont.
Actually that is not all factual. Diesel does put out more particulates, but the "soot" is many times larger than those put out by burning gasoline. According to many experts the particulates from the gasoline engine is much harmful to the deep interior of the lungs. Diesel soot is supposed to be too large to get into the part of the lungs that can cause bad damage.

The bottom line is that each side of the argument has their own "experts" and they each tell a different story. I guess if you pay somone enough or poll enough experts you will find some that will back your side of the claim.
__________________
1981 300D 147k
1998 VW Jetta Tdi 320k
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 141k
1979 300D 234k (sold)
1984 300D "Astor" 262k(sold)
Mercedes How-To and Repair Pictorials
I love the smell of diesel smoke in my hair
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-28-2006, 11:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: West of Ft. Worth. TX
Posts: 4,186
Talking

Yes, and if you apply it to certain parts of your body , it has been known to cause reproductive harm but only in the republic of Kalifornia.
__________________
Sam

84 300SD 350K+ miles ( Blue Belle )
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-28-2006, 01:07 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
ok

i had a discussion at lunch yesterday with my friend who has heavy equipment. i commented that diesel smoke doesnt have enough carbon monoxide to kill you. he said it was just as dangerous as gas exhaust. so anybody have hard facts out there?

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-28-2006, 02:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
They're both potentially carcinogenic. Since gasoline engines require a precise fuel/air mixture in which there's barely enough oxygen to burn all the fuel they tend to produce more carbon monoxide (CO) and hydrocarbons (HC) than a typical diesel engine. You can't smell or see CO but it can kill you without warning. Hydrocarbons are definitely carcinogenic and are the main smog contributor. Diesels on the other hand, because of their high combustion temperatures, tend to produce more nitrogen oxides (NOx) which contribute to smog as well by combining with HC. Diesels also produce higher amount of particulates which you can sometimes see as smoke, but the particle sizes are larger than that of gasoline engines, so there's some debate on which engine type emits more harmful particulates. If you don't think gasoline engines produce particulates, just have a look at the inside of the exhaust pipe of a gasoline car. I'll bet it's black too. Or pull out the spark plugs and more than likely they will be covered in black soot. It's also worth mentioning that diesels cars, thanks to their better fuel economy, produce less CO2, but CO2 in small quantities doesn't affect our health, but it does affect the climate.

Right now however, at least according to the EPA, the latest gasoline cars are cleaner than the latest diesel cars except for CO2 and maybe CO as well. That's because of the high sulfur content of diesel fuel which prevents manufacturers from installing effective catalysts like the ones gasoline cars have. But that will soon change with ULSD. See Mercedes's Bluetec for example. Its emissions will be as clean as the latest Honda Civic, both of them meeting federal BIN5 emissions.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-28-2006, 02:36 PM
pmari's Avatar
OM606.962 177hp 330nm
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: L.I. N.Y.
Posts: 1,033
http://www.dieselforecast.com/ArticleDetails.php?articleID=224

It's the NOx compounds that are of health concerns. There has been more research on diesel particulates than gasoline particulates. So the comparison is incomplete.
__________________
1999 E300DT (131,800) 154,000 Black on Black SOLD

2006 CLK 500 coupe Capri Blue on Grey (zoom,zoom)
47,000mi

04 VW TDI Passat 80,000mi
(Techno)

How to eliminate oil dependency through market-driven approaches.
“We could cut oil use in half by 2025, and by 2040, oil use could be zero,”

The Sound of Diesel Speed
Ode to MB
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-28-2006, 05:50 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
sorry

but you have to spell it out for me. if you have a diesel running in a closed space can the carbon monoxide kill you? like you used to be able to do with a gasser?

i understand now that if a gasser is running (a modern one) the carbon monox ide is so low it wont either.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-28-2006, 06:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Lancaster PA
Posts: 41
Both Gas and Diesel engine use the oxygen from the air. In a closed area when the oxygen is used up you will be dead.

___________________________
300sd
3 Fords
ASE cert.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-28-2006, 07:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
With an older gasoline vehicle the CO from the exhaust would kill you first, long before the oxygen is depleted. That's because CO bonds to hemoglobin (if I remember correctly from biology) which prevents your blood from carrying oxygen to vital organs. Diesel exhaust would take much longer to kill you, and you'd probably just start coughing from the particulates after some time. Some of the modern cars, especially the ones with SULEV and PZEV ratings, probably produce so little CO that you wouldn't die as long as the engine is warmed up and the oxygen isn't depleted, but I still wouldn't risk running any car in an enclosed space. Speaking of emissions, does anyone know what is currently the cleanest production car in the US? This is a test.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL

Last edited by DieselAddict; 01-28-2006 at 07:29 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-28-2006, 09:06 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
It'd be amusing to be in an arguement with a smoker whether the gasser exhaust of their SUV is "less dirty/unhealthy" or not than that of one of our diesels. I'd probably say, well, its those things in your pocket that you should be worrying about, I generally avoid sucking on my car's exhaust pipe, so I'm not going to worry about it.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-28-2006, 09:47 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 437
Quote:
Originally Posted by SD Blue
it has been known to cause reproductive harm
now let me ask... who was the idiot who found that out?? lemme guess, the same guy found when google image search is queried with "love" with safesearch on... about halfway down the page if i remember...
__________________
1982 300D (w123, "Grey Car")
1982 300D (w123, "Blue Car")
2001 Ford F150 "Clifford" (The Big Red Truck)
1997 Dodge Ram 2500 12V Cummins
1996 Dodge Ram 2500 12V Cummins
Previous Vehicles:
1995 E300D, 1980 300SD, 1992 Buick Century, 2005 Saturn Ion
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-28-2006, 09:53 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
cleanest car?

i guess honda insight

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-29-2006, 02:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth
i guess honda insight

tom w
Close, but not quite. Only the California version with the auto transmission seems to be really clean. For some reason the manual one has much higher emissions. Check out www.fueleconomy.gov

The CNG powered Honda Civic is generally accepted as the cleanest car ever, at least for the 2005 model year. The 2006 Civic Hybrids may be nearly as clean but now they only come with automatics which are no fun.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-29-2006, 02:12 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Hmm, here's something interesting... pressure-sensing glow plugs that will help reduce NOx emissions:
http://www.autonews.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060123/SUB/60120114/1116/rss02

__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page