Damn.

Thats VW territory right there!!!

I did 3 runs today, here are the results:
1: 78.7HP-121.1TQ No ALDA boost
2: 96.3HP-134TQ Normal
3: 96.1HP-137TQ Normal, 1200rpm start

It was not what I had hoped for as far as testing. They had a SuperFlow dyno and ran with 2nd gear. My TD used a DynoJet and ran in 4th gear. Very different dyno machines. The superflow uses electric to control the load vs Dynojet uses a fixed mass drum.

I was also suprised to find that I am only running 10.5 psi boost!

Attached Thumbnails

   

thats very cool, thanks for sharing...

is there any sort of correction for your altitude? would you maybe get 10% more (HP?) @ sea level?

__________________
Cheers,
Robert

http://www.wallaceracing.com/braking-hp.php

Your BHP loss computed from your BHP of 120 at sea level and Elevation of 5280 feet is 19.01 HP loss. A turbo should make up all or most of that by 3000rpm.

interesting headlight mix and mash.

__________________

Grey '91 350SDL 214k Dad's car
Beige '81 240D 4 Speed 254k SOLD
Blue '82 300D 225k SOLD
White '95 E300D 46k SOLD
Blue '87 190D 2.5 Turbo 315k SOLD
Brown '80 240D 4 Speed 716k SOLD
Beige '80 300D N/A 119k SOLD
Blue '85 300D Model 186k T-Boned

So, you saw about 95hp and 130ft/lbs at full blatt?

One of these days I need to go run the wagon now that the manual is installed. It will be an interesting comparison.

__________________
Never a dull moment at Berry Hill Farm.

ForcedInduction,

Was this with your 115 intake manifold or did you convert it back to stock?

__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png

wikipedia says the om617 with turbo has 125 horsepower..

Wikipedia is free. You get what you pay for.

__________________
Never a dull moment at Berry Hill Farm.

sigh

im never going to even touch triple digit horsepower.. i guess ill put my lucky triple K to use and an intercooler..

I'm sure wikipedia is quoting Mercedes Benz for the hp number. Of course this was probably for a new engine which I'm sure ForcedInduction isn't using

__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png

Uh, 125HP is at the engine crank, just like every horsepower number ever published. About 20% loss measured at the wheels is considered normal. He is right on the money...

- JimY

Heh was just about to mention this as well.

125 flywheen horsepower is not 125 rear wheel horsepower (sadly).

Yeah, I thought those runs were pretty good for a stock engine that's traveled long.

Assume a 20% loss then it's close enough to 120 hp with 170 lb/ft of torque. Not bad, really.

__________________
1987 300SDL (324000)

1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000)

1978 Porsche 924 (99000)

1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000)

Yay, more than 90rwhp.

__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.[/IMG]