Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-02-2006, 02:11 PM
ConnClark's Avatar
Power User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,123
High capacity oil pump?

Is there a high capacity oil pump availible for the OM617 engine? I'm thinking about compound turbos....

__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2006, 03:15 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark
Is there a high capacity oil pump availible for the OM617 engine? I'm thinking about compound turbos....
don't have a clue , on the other hand I am curious about where you are going to get a better head gasket. I know exactly where you are going with this.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2006, 05:45 PM
Brandon314159
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
hey Conn,

Sorry that I never got around to replying to your PM...its been a very busy day/night for school stuff.

Here is the deal,

If you ran an external pump, you would either have to figure out a way to hook it up to the timing chain or live with the fact that it may fail sometime if belt driven (V-belts not such a good idea...would probably need dual row)

On a VW engine that some friends of mine built recently, the used the toothed timing belt to drive an external HUGE oil pump and also dry sumped the engine.

There isn't an "easy" connect to the engine unless you belted it or something like that.

I like the idea...just tricky figuring out where you could put the "larger" oil pump.

The tube that feeds the turbo on these engines moves a LOT of oil to them, even at idle. I BET if you used watercooled turbos with oil lubrication, you could cut down the flow to the turbos a little (they need less than oil cooled/lubricated ones) and probably make it a whole lot easier.

Of course water is a whole nother bag of beans but atlesat your engine would be happy.

Thats my thought...I'll be watching.

BTW the 617 seems to be able to handle 25psi+ of boost okay even in its "high mile" form...such as mine.

Wastegate hose blew off one night coming home...and coming off a stop sign or something I floored it. Woah nelly look at that boost. you could hear the engine sound totally different and the thing was screaming. And for the skeptics (like myself) the boost overprotection device was doing its job but when you have the fuel turned up and a modified compressor, it makes boost even with non-max fuel

I like my little modded turbo
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2006, 07:27 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Central North Carolina
Posts: 12
There are many side effects to an increased oil volume.
Off the top of my head, I'm thinking....larger sump (pan) & larger drain jounals in the head & oil filter to keep up with the flow...pressure regulation...etc....etc
__________________
'83 300 TD..."Helga" Norse for holy... a liittle rust problem
'85 300 TD...A $200 rear-ended total..being transformed into a pick-up truck
'68 Ford Ranchero GT...a pick-up truck that Ford transformed from their wagon
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-02-2006, 08:34 PM
Diesel Giant's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Loganville/Atlanta
Posts: 2,156
Hmmm... sounds like some block machine work is in your future on this project. Would be a neat set up if you can get it to work. How will you address the fueling reqirements?
__________________
1981 300D 147k
1998 VW Jetta Tdi 320k
2001 Dodge Ram 2500 141k
1979 300D 234k (sold)
1984 300D "Astor" 262k(sold)
Mercedes How-To and Repair Pictorials
I love the smell of diesel smoke in my hair
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-02-2006, 09:10 PM
OMEGAMAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 705
On the Porsche 930 (I have experience with 1) there is a scavenge pump from the oil return on the turbo. It is driven off of the left/driverside camshaft. I wonder if you could use one of these to lube an extra turbo maybe belt or electric drive.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-03-2006, 03:33 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Flushing, MI
Posts: 217
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brandon314159
BTW the 617 seems to be able to handle 25psi+ of boost okay even in its "high mile" form...such as mine.
Can you get 25 pounds by simply messing with the pressure sent to the wastegate? Does it help/hurt fuel consumption?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-03-2006, 01:16 PM
ConnClark's Avatar
Power User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,123
What I'm after is more than just more boost. I want boost over a larger range as well. Short of a VNT this seems to be the best option. I figure I can install a turbo with a smaller turbine housing as the first stage and set an external wastegate to something like 8 psi. I was thinking changing the compressor on my stock turbo like Brandon did to his and using that as a second stage and set its waste gate to 18 psi. The first turbo will spool fast and provide boost in the lower RPM range. As the first turbo falls off at the higher RPMs the second will take up its slack. Intercooling after each stage should boost efficiency more.

I got the idea from looking at my oxidizer cat and noticing that it was about the same size as a turbo.
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-03-2006, 01:21 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
How about a PIC type microcontroller used to control vacuum switches based on measured boost to control a VNT type turbo without a computer?
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-03-2006, 02:54 PM
ConnClark's Avatar
Power User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneheaddoctor
How about a PIC type microcontroller used to control vacuum switches based on measured boost to control a VNT type turbo without a computer?
That would work. The trick is measuring the boost. You will need two pressure switch sensors, one for an upper level and one for a lower level. The PIC would have to try and hold it in the range. When the low pressure switch is asserting its condition the PIC would have to close up the vanes to increase the gasses velocity in the turbine. When the high pressure switch is asserting its condition the PIC would have to open up the vanes to slow the gasses to the turbine. You might be able to do it with one sensor but the PIC would be hunting for the correct setting level all of the time

An FPGA would be better because you could take into account RPMS and map the boost accordingly.
__________________
green 85 300SD 200K miles "Das Schlepper Frog" With a OM603 TBO360 turbo ( To be intercooled someday )( Kalifornistani emissons )
white 79 300SD 200K'ish miles "Farfegnugen" (RIP - cracked crank)
desert storm primer 63 T-bird "The Undead" (long term hibernation)

http://ecomodder.com/forum/fe-graphs/sig692a.png
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-03-2006, 03:09 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConnClark
That would work. The trick is measuring the boost. You will need two pressure switch sensors, one for an upper level and one for a lower level. The PIC would have to try and hold it in the range. When the low pressure switch is asserting its condition the PIC would have to close up the vanes to increase the gasses velocity in the turbine. When the high pressure switch is asserting its condition the PIC would have to open up the vanes to slow the gasses to the turbine. You might be able to do it with one sensor but the PIC would be hunting for the correct setting level all of the time

An FPGA would be better because you could take into account RPMS and map the boost accordingly.

Or using a GM map sensor that is typically good to 5 bar....and use the hardware to convert that from Analog to digital for a more accurate and flexible reading. Its common for the Honda tuners to use the GM map sensors as the Honda ones won't work in a boost situation.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-03-2006, 04:41 PM
OMEGAMAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 705
EMD uses that exact same map sensor on their locomotives. Its funny looking at a 16 cyl 4400 hp engine with the same engine managment sensors as a GM car. I dont know for sure but I thing they get somewhere in the neighbourhood 30 psi boost
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-03-2006, 08:34 PM
boneheaddoctor's Avatar
Senior Benz fanatic
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Hells half acre (Great Falls, Virginia)
Posts: 16,007
Quote:
Originally Posted by OMEGAMAN
EMD uses that exact same map sensor on their locomotives. Its funny looking at a 16 cyl 4400 hp engine with the same engine managment sensors as a GM car. I dont know for sure but I thing they get somewhere in the neighbourhood 30 psi boost
30 psi is roughly 2 bar....the GM sensor is good for 5 bar which is more than it will ever see. good linear way to reference boost electronicly.
__________________
Proud owner of ....
1971 280SE W108
1979 300SD W116
1983 300D W123
1975 Ironhead Sportster chopper
1987 GMC 3/4 ton 4X4 Diesel
1989 Honda Civic (Heavily modified)
---------------------
Section 609 MVAC Certified
---------------------
"He who fights with monsters might take care lest he thereby become a monster. And if you gaze for long into an abyss, the abyss gazes also into you." - Friedrich Nietzsche
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-04-2006, 10:35 AM
OMEGAMAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by boneheaddoctor
30 psi is roughly 2 bar....the GM sensor is good for 5 bar which is more than it will ever see. good linear way to reference boost electronicly.
That was just an anecdote. how much pressure do they run on those little honda's?

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:54 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page