Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-07-2006, 10:14 AM
bcoverss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 55
350SD engine swap to a 300SD

My rod bending 91 350SD has gave up on me. Engine is shot. The car is in mint condition and I hate to put her down. Now I know I could take out a mortgage and have another rod bending engine put but I notice that the 5 cyl turbo diesels of 300SD vintage are thousand$$ less. They are also far more reliable. I could live with the small power loss. Has anyone out there every made this conversion? How hard and what would be involved in making this swap? Any input, insight would be helpful.

It did make it to 231,000.

__________________
1982 240D 370,000 daily driver, great car!
1983 300SD
1995 350SD gone to rod bending heaven.
1986 300SDL should have never sold it.
1995 2Dr 4x4 Tahoe with a highly modified 6.5 turbo diesel, 6in lift.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-07-2006, 01:15 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
i have heard of

it being done just once. most think it is too much difference in controls etc. if it is feasible a lot of folks would like to do it.

another pretty good alternative would be to find a 3.0 liter shortblock and redo your motor with that. maybe you can find one with a bad head.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-07-2006, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: framingham, ma
Posts: 69
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoverss
My rod bending 91 350SD has gave up on me. Engine is shot. The car is in mint condition and I hate to put her down. Now I know I could take out a mortgage and have another rod bending engine put but I notice that the 5 cyl turbo diesels of 300SD vintage are thousand$$ less. They are also far more reliable. I could live with the small power loss. Has anyone out there every made this conversion? How hard and what would be involved in making this swap? Any input, insight would be helpful.

It did make it to 231,000.
There is a factory dealer installed 350SDL complete long block motor for $5K on ebay. It has just over 100K miles on it. It has the paperwork and the service record to verify it is of the newer designed ones sold in 2000 with the factory redesign to put a stop to their rod bending habit. Who knows the car below could just need a timing chain but I would bet the motor is toast like the seller mentions in the ad. Still the parts on that car are easily worth his low BIN asking price.

http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/Mercedes-Factory-350-6-cyl-Turbo-Diesel-126-Engine-SDL_W0QQitemZ8021393807QQcategoryZ33615QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

There is a short block also available from this seller for $5K. There are others selling short blocks but I did not read in their add that they replaced the rod-bender rods. There is a 1991 SDL with a bad timing chain for 2500 BIN price located in Ohio. If I had the loot I will have next month right now I would snag that critter and use my small truck to trailer it home. Then I would cover it and start scrounging for a remanufactured 350SDL motor like the one above on ebay for it. These 350 SDL cars should be worth some decent money as they are rare and some of the quicker and more desired MB diesel cars. You would have to get an estimate from your shop to repower your car with a different MB diesel motor. The cost to do that swap could come close to the cost of the better used long block for sale now on epay. Perhaps a few of the mechanics here can tell you what the swap to another motor will really cost you compared to buying a redesigned MB 350 motor used like the one on epay? Good luck with your car! John
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-07-2006, 02:04 PM
bcoverss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 55
Will the 3.5 head I have now work on the 3.0? I hadn't considered that. A 3.0 short block would be a lot less $$$ and should be a direct drop in right? Would I also be able to use the same accessories, A/C comp, PS, Alt. ect or do I need different brackets?
__________________
1982 240D 370,000 daily driver, great car!
1983 300SD
1995 350SD gone to rod bending heaven.
1986 300SDL should have never sold it.
1995 2Dr 4x4 Tahoe with a highly modified 6.5 turbo diesel, 6in lift.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-07-2006, 02:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoverss
Will the 3.5 head I have now work on the 3.0? I hadn't considered that. A 3.0 short block would be a lot less $$$ and should be a direct drop in right? Would I also be able to use the same accessories, A/C comp, PS, Alt. ect or do I need different brackets?
The 3.5 head will work on the 3.0. This is definitely the way to go. Can't confirm the bracket changes, if any, but, I would doubt that they would be significant.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-07-2006, 02:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,182
Just curious...did the 3.4 bend a rod or was it some other terminal illness?

I keep an eye out for the 3.0 block because if i have one in reserve my 3.4 will never bend a rod.
__________________
82 300D....went to MB heaven
90 350 SDL....excercising con rods
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-07-2006, 03:42 PM
bcoverss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 55
Quote:
Originally Posted by andmoon
Just curious...did the 3.4 bend a rod or was it some other terminal illness?

I keep an eye out for the 3.0 block because if i have one in reserve my 3.4 will never bend a rod.

The number 1 & 2 cyl rods bent and 1 cyl egged shaped pretty bad.
__________________
1982 240D 370,000 daily driver, great car!
1983 300SD
1995 350SD gone to rod bending heaven.
1986 300SDL should have never sold it.
1995 2Dr 4x4 Tahoe with a highly modified 6.5 turbo diesel, 6in lift.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-07-2006, 03:49 PM
bcoverss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 55
In my 3.0 search is there anything I should watchout for or stay away from?
__________________
1982 240D 370,000 daily driver, great car!
1983 300SD
1995 350SD gone to rod bending heaven.
1986 300SDL should have never sold it.
1995 2Dr 4x4 Tahoe with a highly modified 6.5 turbo diesel, 6in lift.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-07-2006, 04:13 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,182
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoverss
In my 3.0 search is there anything I should watchout for or stay away from?
Cracked heads....I think #14 but you are putting the 3.5 heads on right?
__________________
82 300D....went to MB heaven
90 350 SDL....excercising con rods
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-07-2006, 07:04 PM
Hit Man X's Avatar
I LOVE BRUNETTES
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: FUNKYTOWN
Posts: 9,087
Thumbs up

3.5 should have a No 17 correct? I'd pick up a 3.0 shortblock and go with it. I do not think you'd like a 617 in place of the 3.5L...
__________________
I'm not a doctor, but I'll have a look.

'85 300SD 245k
'87 300SDL 251k
'90 300SEL 326k

Six others from BMW, GM, and Ford.

Liberty will not descend to a people; a people must raise themselves to liberty.
[/IMG]
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-07-2006, 07:48 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
and several

folks have reported bent rods on the mb replacement blocks. so it is questionable whether the "improved" rods address the real problem.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-07-2006, 09:54 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
That ebay seller seems to be offering an updated 3.5L short block for $3,500. That seems like a good way to go.

The car won't be worth anything come resale time with a non original engine, plus 350SDL's seem to comand a premium in the market.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-07-2006, 10:00 PM
bcoverss's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Florida
Posts: 55
Ok you guys have convinced me the 3.0 is the way to go. Stupid question but the 3.0 should mount up with my current transmission right? Also if I find a low mileage 3.0 that does not have the #14 bad head should I even bother changing the heads to my 3.5 head? Will the 3.5 head on the 3.0 give me any performance or efficiency advantages?
__________________
1982 240D 370,000 daily driver, great car!
1983 300SD
1995 350SD gone to rod bending heaven.
1986 300SDL should have never sold it.
1995 2Dr 4x4 Tahoe with a highly modified 6.5 turbo diesel, 6in lift.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-07-2006, 10:08 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcoverss
Ok you guys have convinced me the 3.0 is the way to go. Stupid question but the 3.0 should mount up with my current transmission right? Also if I find a low mileage 3.0 that does not have the #14 bad head should I even bother changing the heads to my 3.5 head? Will the 3.5 head on the 3.0 give me any performance or efficiency advantages?
The transmission should give you no issues.

If the engine currently has a functioning head, even if it's a #14, just use it. Keep the head from the 3.5 (probably a #17) as a spare. You don't need to open up the 3.0 engine unless it's got some high miles and could use valves and guides.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-08-2006, 12:55 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does anybody have a picture of a bent 3.5L rod from for an example?

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page