|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Biofuel
No horse in the race per se,(but I guess bottom line we all do) just an interesting Bio article.
http://rense.com/general70/carb.htm
__________________
1981 240d Newport,RI |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
good read
__________________
"If anyone knows other lessons I need to learn, please tell me. I'm tired of learning them the hard way". by JerryBro The Glow Plug Wait: This waiting period is a moment of silence to pay honor to Rudolph Diesel. The longer you own your diesel the more honor you will give him". by SD Blue My normal daily life; either SNAFUed- Situation Normal... All Fouled Up, or FUBARed- Fouled Up Beyond All Repair 62 UNIMOG Camper w/617 Turbo, 85 300SD daily driver- both powered by blended UCO fuels |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
sad read
I'm a bio fuel user-maker but have always believed that bio fuels should NEVER be made from virgin oil, or that crops should be grown for it.
Biodiesel will never be a real choice for the world. It's great as a way of giving used oil a second life but no forests should be cut down in order to make bio. This makes me very sad. Ginny |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Discussed before on the TDIclub forum too. But he is a little miss guided.
http://forums.tdiclub.com/showthread.php?t=129736&highlight=biodiesel+worse
__________________
Current: 05 E320 CDI 07 GL320 CDI 08 Sprinter 05 Dodge Cummins 01 Dodge Cummins Previous 2004 E55 AMG 2002 C32 AMG (#2) 1995 E300 1978 300D 1987 300D 2002 C32 AMG(blown motor :[ 1981 300SD 1983 300SD 1987 300SDL 2002 Jetta TDI 1996 S420 1995 S500 1993 190E 2.6 1992 190E 2.3 1985 190E 2.3 5-Speed |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
I don't per se see a problem with growing crops for it. Think of govt. farm subsididies that could be eliminated if the farmers started growing (rather than not) for a secondary market, namely biodiesel and SVO application. I'm sure there's arguments either way, but cutting down forests for such production suffers from the same shortsighted behavior of the dinofuels industry (Exxon being the classic example).
That said, Wired did an article back in Dec. 2005 explaining why crops are not feasible as a large scale source given the yield of the plants relative to the US fuel consumption demand, and seemed to fall back on the 'oh well, lets just keep buying dino from the middle east'. Where I critcize this article, is not the attitude or the pro-dino feel, but that they completely ignored recent developments in oil production, namely through algae who can produce exponentially higher amounts of oil per acre. This is not hypothetical BS. Groups are actually researching the potential. See this article for starters : http://www.unh.edu/p2/biodiesel/article_alge.html |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
Cheers, Robert |
Bookmarks |
|
|