Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-22-2006, 02:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 138
Diesel Land Speed Record

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2006/08/22/jcb_goes_speed_record/
http://www.channel4.com/4car/news/news-story.jsp?news_id=15088

and here I am put-putting at 90mph in the 300SD

__________________
Bill

'82 300SD 195K
'84 300SD 199K
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-22-2006, 03:10 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillA View Post

and here I am put-putting at 90mph in the 300SD
yea..95mph just isnt cutting it anymore
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-22-2006, 07:06 PM
Deni's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Tirana, Albania
Posts: 429
Fast but why use "two five litre digger engines to produce 750 brake horse power"? The audi r10 uses a 5.5litre, bi turbo I guess, to achieve 650hp. And that's an engine that finished first in 24hrs Le Mans. I'm sure the audi engineers could squize more than 800hp, as the engine is need to last only some km.
__________________
1992 Mercedes 190D 2.5 turbo 5sp manual. EGT+boost gauges. Boost controller set to ~14.5 psi. 1 1/4 turns on full load adjustment. LPG injection. Next in the list is water injection.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-22-2006, 07:33 PM
overdue returnee
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Paterson, NJ
Posts: 213
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deni View Post
Fast but why use "two five litre digger engines to produce 750 brake horse power"? The audi r10 uses a 5.5litre, bi turbo I guess, to achieve 650hp. And that's an engine that finished first in 24hrs Le Mans. I'm sure the audi engineers could squize more than 800hp, as the engine is need to last only some km.
I think these guys wanted to show the world what
their engines could do.
They are backhoe engines and not race engines like
in the Audi's.

Louis.
__________________
Not always the smartest but certainly not dumb?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-22-2006, 09:43 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Deni View Post
Fast but why use "two five litre digger engines to produce 750 brake horse power"? The audi r10 uses a 5.5litre, bi turbo I guess, to achieve 650hp. And that's an engine that finished first in 24hrs Le Mans. I'm sure the audi engineers could squize more than 800hp, as the engine is need to last only some km.
There is a big difference between the two engine designs. While they are only 100hp apart, the torque is about 800ft/lbs for the Audi and probably more than 2500ft/lbs for the digger engines.

Last edited by ForcedInduction; 08-23-2006 at 01:07 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-22-2006, 11:20 PM
diametricalbenz's Avatar
The Crowbar of Embriage
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 3,511
It was unclear as the engines put out 750hp each or 1500hp together?

JCB and Audi are in different markets I doubt JCB is going to start producing cars and similarly I doubt you'll see auto union rings on a backhoe anytime soon. That might not look so cool parked in the valet lot next to the S8.

The Dodge Ram that they raced at Bonneville some years ago that clipped 141 with nearly stock ride height had 890 lbft of torque as I recall and that was from 5.9 liters. They must be squeezing everything those 5 liters have out of them.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:25 PM
ChicagoJones's Avatar
Going with the flow!
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 49
Here is a new article on the JCB DIESELMAX setting the new world speed record for a diesel-engine car.

http://autos.msn.com/advice/article.aspx?contentid=4024418
__________________
CJ

1983 300D 12X,XXX
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-13-2006, 01:33 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 124
Still 750 HP, 1100 Lb/Ft of torque out of five liters. Not all that impressive. I expect something more outrageous, especially considering what can be done with a 5.9L Cummins 6BT.
__________________
1978 Ford F-150 351M
2002 Kia Spectra 1.8l 5-sp
1985 Volkswagen Scirocco 8V 1.8l 5sp
1985 MB 300D Turbo California

"Die Natur verabscheut Vakuum"
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-13-2006, 07:50 PM
OMEGAMAN's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 705
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kynetx View Post
Still 750 HP, 1100 Lb/Ft of torque out of five liters. Not all that impressive. I expect something more outrageous, especially considering what can be done with a 5.9L Cummins 6BT.
I wonder what rpm those engines are turning at

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page