|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
It runs! Finally!
I finally finished the brake job from hell and took the TD out on the road. It started out smoking and with brakes that pulled a little to the right (rusty rotors). After driving it hard up a few hills and standing on the brakes (on clear country roads) it now brakes straight and no smoke at idle! Yahoo!!
Next I get to take it through MD inspection. Does anyone know a reasonable inspector around Frederick MD? The last guy I took a car to be inspected failed it due to a rust bubble (fixed with 10 minutes of sanding and some touch-up paint) and a chattering windsheild wiper blade.
__________________
1984 300TD |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Congrats!
Glad don't have inspections.
__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver 1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver 1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
-nB
__________________
'83 300D Turbo Current: ???K mi - 19.2mpg -> 17.4mpg -> 22.9mpg ---> ODO Died bought at: 233.8K mi - 10MPG For $1.00 3.5 cylinders work: 320 320 100 340 280 Got insurance? FarmersReallySucks.Com |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
EEEEGADS! They flunked you because of a rust bubble and a chattering wiper blade!??
Up here they would flunk you for failed emissions or a cracked windshield, bald tires.....but a rust bubble?...not unless it was related to a major structural failure! Jeez if they did that here 80% of the cars that are 5 years or older would be on the way to the crusher. Better luck this time around! Cheers
__________________
FRED Daily Driver: 98 E300TD 199K Hobby Car: 69 Austin Mini Past Diesels: 84 300SD, 312K 87 300SDL, 251K 94 Chev. K-1500 6.5Ltr.TD, 373K |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
As you are doing on site ask around locally. There are always reasonable people around thank goodness. You still want something for your inspection dollar. Suspension, all steering components and a peek for structuraly dangerous rust. Guys in your area will tell you where to go. It is only practical and reasonable to overlook a few cosmetic things on older cars especially. As long as the vehicle is fundementally safe to use. That was the original intent of inspections. Not nitpicking things to death. We have a few clowns here as well.
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
That's pretty serious, that inspection. I don't think we've had to do any inspection at all for my 300D, emissions or safety or otherwise.
__________________
1985 CA 300D Turbo , 213K mi |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
__________________
My Truck.. 2007 DODGE, 5.9 Cummins, 6spd stick, 4X4. My car..1977 240D, OTHER WHEELS...1955 VW Oval window bug, European Delivery (Holland) with a 1700cc, 2 barrel, Porsche drum brakes. 1939 WILLYS Pick-up. 1967 Triumph 200cc Tiger Cub. 1976 Honda 550F 4cyl Motor Cycle. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
I have slowly come full circle on the need for yearly inspections. Where they exist the common problems like ball joints or tie rods falling apart cease to exist. If you do not have official inspections It is really wise to do your own religiously at one year periods. There is nothing worse than loosing your steering at speed for example in my opinion. Far worse than loosing brakes for example. Where inspections are compulsory it is up to the buyer to make sure he does not pick a shop that wants to make his car that days profit centre. Guys and gals, these cars are 20+ years old and many of them have been really over the road. They demand a good periodical look around. The alternative can be pretty bad. Just common sense if you think it through. With certain problems you cannot realistically drive till they let go. The person you kill may be yourself. Also most of the important parts are cheap if required. Now this must pertain only to real safety issues. Unfortunatly there are now getting to be too many things that go beyond essential safety lumped into so called official safety checks. The exposure to unethical people doing so called proffessional safety checks is also one other miserable factor you have to avoid if you live in one of those areas were they are required.
Last edited by barry123400; 12-04-2006 at 10:40 PM. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
"In Europe you can't get your car licensed without a REAL inspection," he crabbed. "A lot of those cars running around today would be literally thrown off the road in some countries."
REALLY. That's what we need around here all right, a series of rigid inspections, SAFETY inspections, EMISSIONS inspections, AESTHETIC inspections,.....and you'd lose points if you drove anything built in a country we beat in World War II. That's the way they do it in Europe, in France, for instance, a place where they [B][I]REALLY] know how to build cars. Really gets you in the old American spirit. Makes you want to run right out and buy a new Ford Focus, just for the sheer joy of driving. scrfeech the tires a couple of times in honor of good old American ingenuity. Only problem with that, when you drove the thing home for the first time the kids wouldn't know whether you'd bought a new car or rented one from Hertz.
__________________
1991 560 SEC AMG, 199k <---- 300 hp 10:1 ECE euro HV ... 1995 E 420, 170k "The Red Plum" (sold) 2015 BMW 535i xdrive awd Stage 1 DINAN, 6k, <----364 hp 1967 Mercury Cougar, 49k 2013 Jaguar XF, 20k <----340 hp Supercharged, All Wheel Drive (sold) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
I was surprised about the rust bubble. The inspector claimed he had to fail anything that would catch a thread on a gloved hand. I suspect it was because he was trying to sell me body work (which was conveniently offered there).
After going through a rigorous inspection like that, the car never has to have another one, unless it is sold again. Maryland leaves it up to the police to make sure cars have properly working lights, which means it doesn't happen - unless someone gets pulled over for another infraction, or some critical failure causes a collision. Virginia has a yearly safety inspection that is a lot less rigorous. I see a lot fewer cars in VA with dead lights than I see in Maryland.
__________________
1984 300TD |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I've got one of those too.
__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver 1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver 1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
My inspector basically told me it was a rolling death trap as he applied the annual sticker.
__________________
Paul 2004 E500 4matic; 72,000mi |
Bookmarks |
|
|