|
|
|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Volvo 5 speed manual into Mercedes??
G'mornin',
A friend of mine has a 5 speed manual transmission in an '88 Volvo 240DC. I wonder who manufactured it.....ZF maybe?? I also wonder if it will bolt up to a Benz?? I can get it really cheap.....maybe even free.....thought dawned on me that just maybe it's an "off the shelf" tranny, and if so....do we have another source for the elusive 5 speed?? SB
__________________
Diesels: '85 300D, "Max, Blue Benz", 155K, 27.0 MPG '84 190D 2.2, "Eva, Brown Benz", 142K, 40.2 MPG '77 240D (parts car) '67 Eicher ES 202 Tractor "Otto" (2cyl, Air Cooled, 30HP) Gassers: '94 Ford F-150, "Henry", 170K (300 Six) 17.5 MPG '85 190E 2.3, 148K....Parts Car '58 Dodge W300M Powerwagon (Flat Fenders) Less than 10 MPG |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
i have pondered that question myself. bmw trannys too. but i dont know the answer.
i think it is possible. tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Not to change the subject but while we're having trans talk, What about this thought...
I wouldn't change one thing on the engine of my 300d. However the car was designed to travel at 55mph not today's highway speeds of 80 in some states. The MPG would be better and get the RPMs down if it had a modern transmission. Anyone put an Overdrive Tranny in a w123? Mines great! Just doesn't shift into 5th gear like I wish it could. While you're changing the trans maybe the thought of updating? I don't know but I do know if mine went I'd really be doing a search on it.
__________________
-E300d '99 350k -Suburban '93 220k -TDI Jetta '03 350k Sold -F250 '96 7.3 -Dodge Ram 12V -E320 '95 200k -E320 Wagon 1994 155k -300d Turbo '87 187k miles -E320 1994 200k -300d Turbo '84 245k (sold to Dan62) -300d Turbo '84 180k -300sd '80 300k -7.3 Powerstroke Diesel 15P Van 500k+ miles -190d '89 Non Turbo 2.5 5cyl 240k (my first MB) Tom's Imports of Columbia MO Ruined the IP in changing leaky delivery valve O-Rings - Refused to stand behind his work. Mid-MO MB drivers-AVOID Tom's. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
"However the car was designed to travel at 55mph not today's highway speeds of 80"
I seriously doubt the validity of your statement. I can only speak from my long ago experience with a '79 300 CD. That car would run 90 all day long, but the rpms were rather high. I think the gear ratios were designed correctly by the factory. Steve |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
several folks here have swapped in the 247 diff from the v8 equipped cars. it is like having an overdrive tranny without first gear. there is some sacrifice in acceleration but the highway rpm is down and fuel economy is up. it can result in from ten to twenty percent better economy depending on who's experience you listen to. engine wear and noise is greatly reduced as well.
tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC] ..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis. Last edited by t walgamuth; 01-27-2007 at 09:14 PM. Reason: brain fart... wrote engine for diff |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The arguement is made that these are high-speed diesels. Yes, they are in a relative way. The reality is the torque curve is pretty flat so changing gearing modestly has no noticeable effect on performance but helps drastically at cruise speeds by lowering RPM. I have read a bunch of literature and seen it said time and again that a diesel engine should be geared to spin at its torque peak while cruising. That last time I checked that peak occured at 3100-3200rpm on the 617. Sure you can spin the engine faster with no ill-effects but why would you if there are alternatives? Look into the Volvo 5speed. It would be nice to find a bolt on manual that is not so rare as the MB trans. If I had the money I would be trying to get a Borg Warner T5 or Tremec to bolt up. The B&W is so common in 5.0 Mustangs and a very nice shifting trans. I would imagine that a modified MB bellhousing, custom clutch/flywheel/input shaft would be required. The domestic performance clutch suppliers can do this stuff but its not cheap. Unfortunately. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops! 84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K 03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K 93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
I think he means the 2.47 differential.....
Quote:
SB
__________________
Diesels: '85 300D, "Max, Blue Benz", 155K, 27.0 MPG '84 190D 2.2, "Eva, Brown Benz", 142K, 40.2 MPG '77 240D (parts car) '67 Eicher ES 202 Tractor "Otto" (2cyl, Air Cooled, 30HP) Gassers: '94 Ford F-150, "Henry", 170K (300 Six) 17.5 MPG '85 190E 2.3, 148K....Parts Car '58 Dodge W300M Powerwagon (Flat Fenders) Less than 10 MPG |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
Isn't that what MB intended in '85??
Quote:
All MB 300D's are not created equally......my car, along with all other USA model '85 300d's are equipped with the 2.88 axle ratio... '83 and '84 300D's come with the 3.07 axle ratio....W123.133 cars '82 and older 300D's come with the 3.46 axle ratio......W123.130 cars I had thought that this was the MB reaction to increasing highway speeds here in the USA...... SB Note: I also think that I would get better highway mileage if I could run around 85 mph on a steady basis....due to the rpm/torque band and 2.88 gears....
__________________
Diesels: '85 300D, "Max, Blue Benz", 155K, 27.0 MPG '84 190D 2.2, "Eva, Brown Benz", 142K, 40.2 MPG '77 240D (parts car) '67 Eicher ES 202 Tractor "Otto" (2cyl, Air Cooled, 30HP) Gassers: '94 Ford F-150, "Henry", 170K (300 Six) 17.5 MPG '85 190E 2.3, 148K....Parts Car '58 Dodge W300M Powerwagon (Flat Fenders) Less than 10 MPG |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
While I have no doubt that I could cruise all day at 75-80 or more, an overdrive (or 5th gear on standards) would help economy greatly while maintain the off-the-line "performance".
__________________
1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15 '06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod) |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
3000 Rpm = 70 Mph
My ' 85 turns about 3000 RPM at 70 MPH, which is a nice cruising speed for that car. I believe the '85 has a slightly taller rear end, don't know the numbers. The 123 body is not that slippery and fuel economy really goes down if I push too hard against the air resistance. My wife's '87 is another matter. The 124 body has a great Cd and the big six is so smooooth at highway speeds...
__________________
"Buster" in the '95 Our all-Diesel family 1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car 2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022) Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762 "Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz." -- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970 |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Not likely, your mileage will decrease at higher speeds regardless of ratio in these cars. The increased power requirement will overcome the higher efficiency of operating at the peak torque point. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
At the yard I frequent, there is a w123 that was manufactured 10/84 So that would make it the 85 model. If I were to stick that rear in my 83, what kind of top end speed would I be seeing @ 3200rpm. Is the switch worth it?
__________________
81 Mercedes 300SD 289k.......SOLD 82 Mercedes 300CD 252k......slow ride 82 mercedes 300 SD...mi Unknown 83 Mercedes 300D ????ksniff..gone too 84 Mercedes 300D 148k........SOLD 85 Mercedes 300TD 386k and holding some one elses project |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I swear by the 2.88 rearend in the 85's, because at 70mph I'm turning 0 rpm's......
__________________
Jimmy L. '05 Acura TL 6MT 2001 ML430 My Spare Gone: '95 E300 188K "Batmobile" Texas Unfriendly Black '85 300TD 235K "The Wagon" Texas Friendly White '80 240D 154K "China" Scar engine installed '81 300TD 240K "Smash" '80 240D 230K "The Squash" '81 240D 293K"Scar" Rear ended harder than Elton John |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
[QUOTE=Jeremy5848;1401593]My ' 85 turns about 3000 RPM at 70 MPH, which is a nice cruising speed for that car. I believe the '85 has a slightly taller rear end, don't know the numbers.QUOTE
You are correct sir! My '84 300D turns @3400rpm at 70-75mph, IIRC. I have in my posession a 2.88 diff and cluster from an '85. My math says I should see approximately 400rpm less at the same speed once I swap. That with a slightly taller tire will allow more comfortable cruising in todays 75+mph traffic. RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops! 84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K 03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K 93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
I still like my 3.07 gears with 205/70-14 tires, that gives me a tad over 3500 rpm at 80 mph. I could lower the rpms a little with a 2.88, but I don't want to lose any more low end power. My engine seems happiest between 3000 and 3500.
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|