Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-27-2007, 06:22 AM
Shorebilly's Avatar
Marine Engineer (retired)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,268
Question Volvo 5 speed manual into Mercedes??

G'mornin',

A friend of mine has a 5 speed manual transmission in an '88 Volvo 240DC.

I wonder who manufactured it.....ZF maybe?? I also wonder if it will bolt up to a Benz??

I can get it really cheap.....maybe even free.....thought dawned on me that just maybe it's an "off the shelf" tranny, and if so....do we have another source for the elusive 5 speed??

SB

__________________

Diesels:
'85 300D, "Max, Blue Benz", 155K, 27.0 MPG
'84 190D 2.2, "Eva, Brown Benz", 142K, 40.2 MPG
'77 240D (parts car)
'67 Eicher ES 202 Tractor "Otto" (2cyl, Air Cooled, 30HP)
Gassers:
'94 Ford F-150, "Henry", 170K (300 Six) 17.5 MPG
'85 190E 2.3, 148K....Parts Car
'58 Dodge W300M Powerwagon (Flat Fenders) Less than 10 MPG
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-27-2007, 08:35 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,613
i have pondered that question myself. bmw trannys too. but i dont know the answer.

i think it is possible.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-27-2007, 08:52 AM
777funk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 1,031
Not to change the subject but while we're having trans talk, What about this thought...
I wouldn't change one thing on the engine of my 300d. However the car was designed to travel at 55mph not today's highway speeds of 80 in some states. The MPG would be better and get the RPMs down if it had a modern transmission. Anyone put an Overdrive Tranny in a w123? Mines great! Just doesn't shift into 5th gear like I wish it could.
While you're changing the trans maybe the thought of updating? I don't know but I do know if mine went I'd really be doing a search on it.
__________________
-E300d '99 350k
-Suburban '93 220k
-TDI Jetta '03 350k
Sold
-F250 '96 7.3
-Dodge Ram 12V
-E320 '95 200k
-E320 Wagon 1994 155k
-300d Turbo '87 187k miles
-E320 1994 200k
-300d Turbo '84 245k (sold to Dan62)
-300d Turbo '84 180k
-300sd '80 300k
-7.3 Powerstroke Diesel 15P Van 500k+ miles
-190d '89 Non Turbo 2.5 5cyl 240k (my first MB)
Tom's Imports of Columbia MO Ruined the IP in changing leaky delivery valve O-Rings - Refused to stand behind his work. Mid-MO MB drivers-AVOID Tom's.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-27-2007, 10:35 AM
Sportlines
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Johnson City, TN
Posts: 985
"However the car was designed to travel at 55mph not today's highway speeds of 80"

I seriously doubt the validity of your statement. I can only speak from my long ago experience with a '79 300 CD. That car would run 90 all day long, but the rpms were rather high. I think the gear ratios were designed correctly by the factory.



Steve
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:15 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,613
several folks here have swapped in the 247 diff from the v8 equipped cars. it is like having an overdrive tranny without first gear. there is some sacrifice in acceleration but the highway rpm is down and fuel economy is up. it can result in from ten to twenty percent better economy depending on who's experience you listen to. engine wear and noise is greatly reduced as well.

tom w
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.

Last edited by t walgamuth; 01-27-2007 at 09:14 PM. Reason: brain fart... wrote engine for diff
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:22 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 2,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by 777funk View Post
Not to change the subject but while we're having trans talk, What about this thought...
I wouldn't change one thing on the engine of my 300d. However the car was designed to travel at 55mph not today's highway speeds of 80 in some states. The MPG would be better and get the RPMs down if it had a modern transmission. Anyone put an Overdrive Tranny in a w123? Mines great! Just doesn't shift into 5th gear like I wish it could.
While you're changing the trans maybe the thought of updating? I don't know but I do know if mine went I'd really be doing a search on it.
I agree with you. Many rear differential swaps have been performed with the idea of better highway performance due to lower RPM's. 3.08's swapped for 2.88's and 2.47's. The results have always seemed worth it to the owners despite claims of "lugging" the engine or reduced performance at lower speeds.

The arguement is made that these are high-speed diesels. Yes, they are in a relative way. The reality is the torque curve is pretty flat so changing gearing modestly has no noticeable effect on performance but helps drastically at cruise speeds by lowering RPM.

I have read a bunch of literature and seen it said time and again that a diesel engine should be geared to spin at its torque peak while cruising. That last time I checked that peak occured at 3100-3200rpm on the 617. Sure you can spin the engine faster with no ill-effects but why would you if there are alternatives?

Look into the Volvo 5speed. It would be nice to find a bolt on manual that is not so rare as the MB trans. If I had the money I would be trying to get a Borg Warner T5 or Tremec to bolt up. The B&W is so common in 5.0 Mustangs and a very nice shifting trans. I would imagine that a modified MB bellhousing, custom clutch/flywheel/input shaft would be required. The domestic performance clutch suppliers can do this stuff but its not cheap. Unfortunately.

RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops!
84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K
03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K
93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:25 AM
Shorebilly's Avatar
Marine Engineer (retired)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,268
I think he means the 2.47 differential.....

Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
several folks here have swapped in the 247 engine from the v8 equipped cars. it is like having an overdrive tranny without first gear. there is some sacrifice in acceleration but the highway rpm is down and fuel economy is up. it can result in from ten to twenty percent better economy depending on who's experience you listen to. engine wear and noise is greatly reduced as well.

tom w
I think you mean the 2.47 axle ratio differential......not the engine.....

SB
__________________

Diesels:
'85 300D, "Max, Blue Benz", 155K, 27.0 MPG
'84 190D 2.2, "Eva, Brown Benz", 142K, 40.2 MPG
'77 240D (parts car)
'67 Eicher ES 202 Tractor "Otto" (2cyl, Air Cooled, 30HP)
Gassers:
'94 Ford F-150, "Henry", 170K (300 Six) 17.5 MPG
'85 190E 2.3, 148K....Parts Car
'58 Dodge W300M Powerwagon (Flat Fenders) Less than 10 MPG
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:43 AM
Shorebilly's Avatar
Marine Engineer (retired)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 1,268
Isn't that what MB intended in '85??

Quote:
Originally Posted by 777funk View Post
Not to change the subject but while we're having trans talk, What about this thought...
I wouldn't change one thing on the engine of my 300d. However the car was designed to travel at 55mph not today's highway speeds of 80 in some states. The MPG would be better and get the RPMs down if it had a modern transmission. Anyone put an Overdrive Tranny in a w123? Mines great! Just doesn't shift into 5th gear like I wish it could.
While you're changing the trans maybe the thought of updating? I don't know but I do know if mine went I'd really be doing a search on it.
From your sig, you own an '84 300D......

All MB 300D's are not created equally......my car, along with all other USA model '85 300d's are equipped with the 2.88 axle ratio...

'83 and '84 300D's come with the 3.07 axle ratio....W123.133 cars

'82 and older 300D's come with the 3.46 axle ratio......W123.130 cars

I had thought that this was the MB reaction to increasing highway speeds here in the USA......

SB

Note: I also think that I would get better highway mileage if I could run around 85 mph on a steady basis....due to the rpm/torque band and 2.88 gears....
__________________

Diesels:
'85 300D, "Max, Blue Benz", 155K, 27.0 MPG
'84 190D 2.2, "Eva, Brown Benz", 142K, 40.2 MPG
'77 240D (parts car)
'67 Eicher ES 202 Tractor "Otto" (2cyl, Air Cooled, 30HP)
Gassers:
'94 Ford F-150, "Henry", 170K (300 Six) 17.5 MPG
'85 190E 2.3, 148K....Parts Car
'58 Dodge W300M Powerwagon (Flat Fenders) Less than 10 MPG
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:46 AM
SwampYankee's Avatar
New England Hick
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Posts: 1,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by softconsult View Post
"However the car was designed to travel at 55mph not today's highway speeds of 80"

I seriously doubt the validity of your statement. I can only speak from my long ago experience with a '79 300 CD. That car would run 90 all day long, but the rpms were rather high. I think the gear ratios were designed correctly by the factory.



Steve
I'm just curious, are the gear/tranny ratios different in Euro spec cars? I would think that the ratios and gears were chosen for US spec cars based on the 55mph speed limit, fuel economy situation, etc. in place in the US at the time our cars were sold. That is the car was designed to run at X RPMs all day long, how fast X RPMs would be wound depend on the gearing and tranny.

While I have no doubt that I could cruise all day at 75-80 or more, an overdrive (or 5th gear on standards) would help economy greatly while maintain the off-the-line "performance".
__________________

1980 300TD-China Blue/Blue MBTex-2nd Owner, 107K (Alt Blau) OBK #15
'06 Chevy Tahoe Z71 (for the wife & 4 kids, current mule) '03 Honda Odyssey (son #1's ride, reluctantly) '99 GMC Suburban (255K+ miles, semi-retired mule) 21' SeaRay Seville (summer escape pod)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:52 AM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
3000 Rpm = 70 Mph

Quote:
Originally Posted by rwthomas1 View Post
...I have read a bunch of literature and seen it said time and again that a diesel engine should be geared to spin at its torque peak while cruising. That last time I checked that peak occured at 3100-3200rpm on the 617...RT
My ' 85 turns about 3000 RPM at 70 MPH, which is a nice cruising speed for that car. I believe the '85 has a slightly taller rear end, don't know the numbers. The 123 body is not that slippery and fuel economy really goes down if I push too hard against the air resistance. My wife's '87 is another matter. The 124 body has a great Cd and the big six is so smooooth at highway speeds...
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-27-2007, 11:54 AM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorebilly View Post
'83 and '84 300D's come with the 3.07 axle ratio....W123.133 cars

'82 and older 300D's come with the 3.46 axle ratio......W123.130 cars
Actually the 82s are W123.133, with 3.07.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shorebilly View Post
Note: I also think that I would get better highway mileage if I could run around 85 mph on a steady basis....due to the rpm/torque band and 2.88 gears....
Not likely, your mileage will decrease at higher speeds regardless of ratio in these cars. The increased power requirement will overcome the higher efficiency of operating at the peak torque point.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-27-2007, 12:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Sunrise, FL
Posts: 2,053
At the yard I frequent, there is a w123 that was manufactured 10/84 So that would make it the 85 model. If I were to stick that rear in my 83, what kind of top end speed would I be seeing @ 3200rpm. Is the switch worth it?
__________________
81 Mercedes 300SD 289k.......SOLD
82 Mercedes 300CD 252k......slow ride

82 mercedes 300 SD...mi Unknown
83 Mercedes 300D ????ksniff..gone too
84 Mercedes 300D 148k........SOLD
85 Mercedes 300TD 386k and holding some one elses project
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-27-2007, 01:56 PM
JimmyL's Avatar
Rogue T Intolerant!!!
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sunnyvale, Texas (DFW)
Posts: 9,675
I swear by the 2.88 rearend in the 85's, because at 70mph I'm turning 0 rpm's......
__________________
Jimmy L.
'05 Acura TL 6MT
2001 ML430 My Spare

Gone:
'95 E300 188K "Batmobile" Texas Unfriendly Black
'85 300TD 235K "The Wagon" Texas Friendly White
'80 240D 154K "China" Scar engine installed
'81 300TD 240K "Smash"
'80 240D 230K "The Squash"
'81 240D 293K"Scar" Rear ended harder than Elton John
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-27-2007, 01:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Wakefield, RI
Posts: 2,145
[QUOTE=Jeremy5848;1401593]My ' 85 turns about 3000 RPM at 70 MPH, which is a nice cruising speed for that car. I believe the '85 has a slightly taller rear end, don't know the numbers.QUOTE

You are correct sir! My '84 300D turns @3400rpm at 70-75mph, IIRC. I have in my posession a 2.88 diff and cluster from an '85. My math says I should see approximately 400rpm less at the same speed once I swap. That with a slightly taller tire will allow more comfortable cruising in todays 75+mph traffic.

RT
__________________
When all else fails, vote from the rooftops!
84' Mercedes Benz 300D Anthracite/black, 171K
03' Volkswagen Jetta TDI blue/black, 93K
93' Chevrolet C2500HD ExCab 6.5TD, Two-tone blue, 252K
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-27-2007, 02:20 PM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I still like my 3.07 gears with 205/70-14 tires, that gives me a tad over 3500 rpm at 80 mph. I could lower the rpms a little with a 2.88, but I don't want to lose any more low end power. My engine seems happiest between 3000 and 3500.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page