Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-12-2007, 09:47 PM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
Tales of non-MB FI ruined by ULSD

I subscribe to a mailing list, burnveggies@goblin.punk.net, that revolves around biofuels and diesel-engined cars, primarily in the San Francisco Bay area. Lately there have been numerous reports of VW TDI and BMW 524 TD fuel injection systems being "eaten" by the new ULSD fuel. The complaints have something to do with the rubber seals in the FI system.

I know little of Mercedes fuel injection systems and nothing of anyone else's. A 'short course' in comparative fuel injection systems would be appreciated from one of the many experts here. Why does Mercedes apparently not suffer from this same problem?

__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-12-2007, 10:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, CA & 1,150 miles S of Key West
Posts: 4,874
It does, it has.

The problem is the difference in the aromatics put into the new fuel which effects rubber componets.

It not that it is bad, but that it is different and causes o-rings (in the case of my OM606) to shrink resluting in fuel, or worse, air leaks.

I don't know of anyone who can attribute a pump failure to ULSD.
__________________
Terry Allison
N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama

09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA)
09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-12-2007, 10:45 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I don't feel that some rubber seals leaking should be called "ruined". I would call a pump ruined when it stops pumping fuel, barrel bores are scored, or physically broken.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-12-2007, 10:51 PM
mobetta's Avatar
(Oo{-I-}oO)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: minnesota,hey.
Posts: 1,841
there were plenty of posts about leaking delivery valve seals over here for a while to, mostly the om 60x engines, i believe.

I do not recall reading about a 617/616 developing leaks due to ULSD.

and the ? is wether or not the fuel caused it, or if they were going anyways.
__________________
1984 123.193 372,xxx miles, room for Seven.

1999 Dodge Durango Cummins 4BTAA 47RE 5k lb 4x4 getting 25+mpgs, room for Seven.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-13-2007, 01:39 AM
Diesel newbie ;-)
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 412
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
I don't feel that some rubber seals leaking should be called "ruined". I would call a pump ruined when it stops pumping fuel, barrel bores are scored, or physically broken.
True enough, but it sure as heck qualifies as damaged and/or non optimal performance.

If you are pre '85 I highly recommend redline diesel fuel catalyst at about a 2:1 over their suggested mix rate. (I blend RL-2 and catalyst as a mix and use that as an additive package). I've had no seal issues and I'll put money that the nailing I was getting when I acquired the car was helped along by the additives (specifically RL-2). The catalyst is specifically formulated to help with lost aromatics, and is not ULSD certified (my local store has to put stickers on every bottle, even though they know I'm buying the entire case).

Speaking of which: CarQuest in Orangevale (greenback and walnut) CA will order all the RL additives you want without making you buy more than one bottle, if anyone in Sac has trouble finding it. I've been working on them to carry Lubro Molly products, but no luck yet.
-nB
__________________
'83 300D Turbo
Current: ???K mi - 19.2mpg -> 17.4mpg -> 22.9mpg ---> ODO Died
bought at: 233.8K mi - 10MPG For $1.00
3.5 cylinders work: 320 320 100 340 280
Got insurance? FarmersReallySucks.Com
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-13-2007, 01:41 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I've been running ULSD without commercial additives (Only an ounce of acetone) since it was first offered and it has yet to leak a single drop of fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-13-2007, 08:34 AM
POS's Avatar
POS POS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,506
I've been running ULSD since summer of last year, and my 606 engine leaked through most of its lines last Dec. I've replaced them all and the leaked stopped. I mention this because just about that time I noticed A LOT of people having the same issue on these forums and through my own MB mechanic. Was ULSD the cause? Don't know.
__________________
- Brian


1989 500SEL Euro
1966 250SE Cabriolet
1958 BMW Isetta 600
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-13-2007, 02:13 PM
dmorrison's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Colleyville, Texas
Posts: 2,695
This is the second time the sulfur content has been changed in diesel. Back in around 97 or so the EPA made the first change. Back then there were reports of 18 wheelers having had to get their injection pumps rebuilt. But the Bosch in line injection pumps did not have any problems. The rubber hoses did start to leak. I had to replace all the return lines as well as the fuel tank lines. It could have been due to age. I have not had to replace anything as of yet this time.
It does concern me about the ULSD's lubrication effect. The sulfur does provide a certain amount of lubrication and now that the supfer had been reduced will it effect pumps parts that used the diesel fuel for lubrication? The pump is internally lubricated by oil. But some parts depend on the diesel fuel. I guess we'll see.

Dave
__________________
1970 220D, owned 1980-1990
1980 240D, owned 1990-1992
1982 300TD, owned 1992-1993
1986 300SDL, owned 1993-2004
1999 E300, owned 1999-2003
1982 300TD, 213,880mi, owned since Nov 18, 1991- Aug 4, 2010 SOLD
1988 560SL, 100,000mi, owned since 1995
1965 Mustang Fastback Mileage Unknown(My sons)
1983 240D, 176,000mi (My daughers) owned since 2004
2007 Honda Accord EX-L I4 auto, the new daily driver
1985 300D 264,000mi Son's new daily driver.(sold)
2008 Hyundai Tiberon. Daughters new car

Last edited by dmorrison; 02-14-2007 at 02:11 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-13-2007, 02:18 PM
mobetta's Avatar
(Oo{-I-}oO)
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: minnesota,hey.
Posts: 1,841
If your on the cheeeep, just add a pint of new veg oil or motor oil to the tank on fill up. it will add lubrication.
__________________
1984 123.193 372,xxx miles, room for Seven.

1999 Dodge Durango Cummins 4BTAA 47RE 5k lb 4x4 getting 25+mpgs, room for Seven.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:04 PM
justinperkins's Avatar
I ♥ German Cars
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,312
My TDI recently developed a leak at the IP due to a failed o-ring that seals the pump head (cast iron) to the pump body (aluminum). It's a common leak point and an easy afternoon fix, hardly constitutes the IP being eaten. At the time I developed the leak it was after I ran through almost a full tank of ULSD, it was the first non-biodiesel tank I had used in quite a while.
__________________
-justin

1987 300TD, 1987 300TD
2008 R32, 2000 Passat Wagon
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:11 PM
Parrot of Doom's Avatar
1997 W210 E300TD 243,000
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 983
I keep telling people, we've had ULSD in the UK for years now, and I've never heard of anything similar happening over here.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:24 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, CA & 1,150 miles S of Key West
Posts: 4,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parrot of Doom View Post
I keep telling people, we've had ULSD in the UK for years now, and I've never heard of anything similar happening over here.
The reason is the aromatics in the fuel have remained constant during that time. The issue will slowly resolve itself here just as it did when LSD was introduced previously.

There were lots of 606 leak issues on the forum in late Dec and early Jan a few months after the rollout occured. Cold weather also arrived which prob excerbated the shrinking/drying out issues as well.
__________________
Terry Allison
N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama

09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA)
09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-13-2007, 03:51 PM
rrgrassi's Avatar
mmmmmm Diesel...
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Royse City Tx
Posts: 5,177
I have not had any issues w/ ULSD in my car, yet...
__________________
RRGrassi


70's Southern Pacific #5608 Fairmont A-4 MOW car

13 VW JSW 2.0 TDI 193K, Tuned with DPF and EGR Delete.

91 W124 300D Turbo replaced, Pressure W/G actuator installed. 210K

90 Dodge D250 5.9 Cummins/5 speed. 400K
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-13-2007, 07:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Everett, WA
Posts: 124
I wonder if the VW TDIs that are having trouble are the Pumpė-Dusė* models. Kind of a dumb setup if you ask me.**







*To make the ė, hold down alt and type 137 on your numeric keypad
**Nobody has.
__________________
1978 Ford F-150 351M
2002 Kia Spectra 1.8l 5-sp
1985 Volkswagen Scirocco 8V 1.8l 5sp
1985 MB 300D Turbo California

"Die Natur verabscheut Vakuum"
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-13-2007, 09:25 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Annapolis, MD
Posts: 650
It is not the lack of sulfur that is the problem - sulfur doesn't do anything except pollute. When sulfur is removed, the process removes lubricity as well. But diesel fuel is made to an ASTM standard which includes a lubricity requirement. To meet the standard, refiners simply add lubricity enhancers back in.

When diesel was changed to LSD a few years back, it was a huge change compared to the change we're seeing from LSD to ULSD. ULSD can cause seals to shrink (just as E10 does) but I suspect most cases of leaking are due to systems that were marginal anyway.

One thing I've learned about fuels over the years is that they are like the weather - there's nothing you can do about them. ULSD is here to stay. The vast majority of diesel engines will not be effected. If you are worried that the refineries are not adding lubricity, add 2% biodiesel or straight veg oil.

__________________
1984 300Sd 210k

Former cars:
1984 300D 445k (!!) (Strider) Original (and not rebuilt) engine and transmission. Currently running on V80 ( 80% vegetable oil, 20% petroleum products). Actually not, taking a WVO break.
1993 300d 2.5 275k. Current 120/day commuter
1981 300SD 188k (Hans) Killed by a deer
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:22 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page