Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-13-2007, 01:00 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
Fastest 0-60 from STOCK diesel? (pre-1990)

What pre-1990 Mercedes diesel has the fastest 0-60?

__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-13-2007, 01:10 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
1987 300D Turbo with the 6cyl 603 engine.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-13-2007, 01:23 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Concur
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-13-2007, 01:57 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
I know an '82 300CD hits 60 in about 15 seconds. How fast is the '87 300sd?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-13-2007, 02:00 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by derherr65 View Post
I know an '82 300CD hits 60 in about 15 seconds. How fast is the '87 300sd?
There was no SD in '87. The vehicle with the speed is the W124 body......300D.......and it will do a 0-60 run in 10.5 seconds (sometimes less).

My '86 with the same engine can just nip the 11 second mark.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-13-2007, 02:08 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
Ah, ok. Thanks. With only 20 more HP why are they so much faster than a w123 300d?
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-13-2007, 02:14 PM
mrhills0146
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
What about the 190D w/ the turbo? Available 1 yr only, as I recollect.

The 123 was only avail w/ the 617 turbodiesel, not the 603. Plus, I believe the 123 is a heavier car, though I could be wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-13-2007, 02:15 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by derherr65 View Post
Ah, ok. Thanks. With only 20 more HP why are they so much faster than a w123 300d?
A good running 300D should be in the 13.5 range. My SD runs 12.7. The W124 has a much more streamlined body and it's weight is about 150 lb. less than the W123. The additional 25 hp represents an increase of 25% over the 617. So, all else being equal, the ET's are going to drop proportionally.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:26 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 678
My nonturbo 300cd runs 0-60 in 22 seconds. It needs some new filters, diesel purge and an italian tuneup among other things...
__________________
1980 240d
1999 SL500
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:27 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
You're right, if a OM617 300D can do 0-60 in 13.5 seconds. Mine does about 15 seconds, even with increased boost. The fastest OM617 300d I know of is only down to 14 seconds at best, and highly modified at that.

Pulling out the good old F=MA rule...
OM617 300D 2937N=3500lbs(1587Kg)x60mph/14.5sec(1.85m/s/s)
OM603 300D 3873N=3350lbs(1519Kg)x60mph/10.5sec(2.55m/s/s)

That's a 32% increase in apparent power. 123HP to 147HP is only a 20% increase. There must be a significant increase in low end torque, much earlier turbo spool up, or something to account for that. That or one of our numbers is wrong. Curb weights are notoriously inaccurate, and who knows how conservative Mercedes is with it's power figures.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:33 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by derherr65 View Post
You're right, if a OM617 300D can do 0-60 in 13.5 seconds. Mine does about 15 seconds, even with increased boost. The fastest OM617 300d I know of is only down to 14 seconds at best, and highly modified at that.

Pulling out the good old F=MA rule...
OM617 300D 2937N=3500lbs(1587Kg)x60mph/14.5sec(1.85m/s/s)
OM603 300D 3873N=3350lbs(1519Kg)x60mph/10.5sec(2.55m/s/s)

That's a 32% increase in apparent power. 123HP to 147HP is only a 20% increase. There must be a significant increase in low end torque, much earlier turbo spool up, or something to account for that. That or one of our numbers is wrong. Curb weights are notoriously inaccurate, and who knows how conservative Mercedes is with it's power figures.
I think the error here is the use of 14.5 seconds for the W123. I believe that there are vehicles on the forum that can get down to the 13.5 range, but, my figure is based upon the SD. My SD is at 12.7 and it's not the fastest on here (it's got a 2.88 diff). So, I'm extrapolating that a very good running W123 should achieve 13.5 seconds with a 3.07 diff.

If it cannot achieve 13.5 seconds, then the body is severely hindering the performance and the W124 would have a serious benefit in wind resistance.

That would be the reason why the numbers are so discrepant.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:37 PM
derherr65's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: North Texas
Posts: 305
I hear the 124 gets better mileage due to lower wind resistance. Just surprised that is has that much effect in a 0-60.
__________________
I suggest we solve high gas prices with environmentalists... unfortunately they don't burn well.
1982 300CD, 220K miles: This vacuum system will be the death of me yet! (OBK #26)
1977 F150 400 C6 2wd, 10.2 sec 1/8 mile with 2.75 gears.
1965 Mustang. Mostly stock... LOL!
2001 Ram 2500, cummins, 5spd, 202k miles.(girlfriends)
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-13-2007, 03:37 PM
truckinik's Avatar
And I only had one lesson
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Clearwater Beach, Florida
Posts: 1,022
Well, I know my older, non turbo 300CD's, are slower than molasses, off the line, and only marginal in the top speed department. The Turbo cars, do only a little better, but still basically can't get out of their own way. I know they weigh a lot, and have very few horses to move them. I never timed anything, or cared to though.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:09 PM
justinperkins's Avatar
I ♥ German Cars
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
1987 300D Turbo with the 6cyl 603 engine.
And a close second goes to 87 300TD Turbo with the 6 cyl. 603
__________________
-justin

1987 300TD, 1987 300TD
2008 R32, 2000 Passat Wagon
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-13-2007, 04:10 PM
justinperkins's Avatar
I ♥ German Cars
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,312
Quote:
Originally Posted by derherr65 View Post
I hear the 124 gets better mileage due to lower wind resistance. Just surprised that is has that much effect in a 0-60.
Lowest wind resistance of any production car at that time, still pretty respectable to present-day cars. The 124 rocks.

__________________
-justin

1987 300TD, 1987 300TD
2008 R32, 2000 Passat Wagon
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page