Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20
E320 or E300TD???

I currently have a 1998 E320 with 46K miles on it. It is superclean and Im the second owner. I purchased a 1998 E300TD about a month ago with 95K miles on it and was wondering which should I keep? and which should I sell? since I really dont have room for both. Which is more reliable and trouble free in the long term? I plan on keeping either car for a very long time. Thanks for your advice.


Last edited by guykoh; 07-03-2007 at 04:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:24 PM
POS's Avatar
POS POS is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 2,506
Why would you buy a '98 diesel then ask if you should sell it? Personally, I would have kept the 98 gas with the low miles - the 1998 was an excellent car and the gas mileage shouldn't be too much of a deficit. I'd keep the '98 gasser.
__________________
- Brian


1989 500SEL Euro
1966 250SE Cabriolet
1958 BMW Isetta 600
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:26 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
The E320 will probably last 100-150K miles while the E300 can realistically last to 300K miles.

The E320 is more simple but the E300 is made better.

The E320 will get about 25mpg average but the E300 can get 30mpg+
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-03-2007, 03:31 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20
I bought the E300TD for a great price, I thought I couldnt lose either way if I dont like it i can sell it. But now that Ive had it I really like it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-03-2007, 04:08 PM
muleears's Avatar
Old MB Driver
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Windsor, VA
Posts: 1,435
If you don't mind my asking what was the really great price? I just bought a 98 with 150K for 10.5K I thought that was a pretty good price. I hope you did better.
__________________

Muleears
'07 E320 Bluetec 133K my DD
'04 Jaguar XJ8 VDP, 34K
'10 Hyundai Accent 60K Grocery Getter
'02 VW Golf soon to be on the road again
'97 E300 Diesel Son's DD
'61 VERY tolerant wife

Hampton Roads, VA USA

Gone but not forgotten:
'67 250S 95K
'86 300SDL
'87 300D Turbo, 364K! R.I.P.
'98 E300 Turbodiesel, 213K
'02 S420, 164K
'01 Prius 138K
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-03-2007, 04:21 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 20
Wow thats awesome, what state did you buy it in? I bought mine for $17K

Last edited by guykoh; 07-03-2007 at 04:28 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-03-2007, 04:23 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
The E320 is more simple but the E300 is made better.
Please explain

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-03-2007, 04:30 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Diesel bias?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-03-2007, 04:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 2,220
The M112 is a very stout design. It never needs a headgasket, no wiring harness issues, it has plugs that last 100K miles, and it gets incredible gas mileage.

I have no doubt the M112 will see 200 - 250K miles if taken care of. Most E320 gassers get around 30 mpg, some even better, on the highway at 70 mph. Albeit on premium gas.

I'd sell the diesel and keep the gasser. The newer diesels are overpriced now, IMHO. But not to as much as a degree as the older W123's.
__________________
1987 300SDL (324000)

1986 Porsche 951 (944 Turbo) (166000)

1978 Porsche 924 (99000)

1996 Nissan Pathfinder R50 (201000)
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-03-2007, 05:02 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
The newer diesel's are overpriced I wouldn't buy one. Sell the E300D, the M112 is a better motor. If you need to change the glow plugs on that E300D chances are you will have to pull the head, so there goes all your fuel mileage savings right there.

They are the same car.
Same 722.6 transmission
But the M112 is a simple problem free mill.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-03-2007, 05:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Plano, TX
Posts: 2,574
I'd keep the gasser. Frankly, I think the M112 is a better engine than the OM606.

M112 problem areas: 1) harmonic balance (not expensive to replace, likely all of them are fixed by now). 2) Plug wires don't last forever. Wires are ~$200 and easy to replace.

OM606 problem areas: 1) Stuck glowplugs - sometimes several thousdand $$ to repair. 2) Fuel leaks.

Plugs on the M112 last 5 years/100K miles. The glowplugs on my E300 went out every 3 years.

- JimY
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-03-2007, 06:22 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Diesel bias?
AMEN!

Sixto
87 300D

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page