Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-05-2007, 09:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Annapolis, Md.
Posts: 556
Ccv

Is it an absolute no no to put a breather on the crankcase ventilation instead of the current system sucking the oil vapors back into the engine?

__________________
-disav

99 E300 TURBODIESEL Astral Silver 282K - AMG brakes, suspension, monoblocks, speedo & interior - Full Load Maxed on IP by custom Speed Tuning USA Chip - T3/T4 Garrett - EGR/MAF delete
98 E300 TURBODIESEL Alexandrite Green on black leather 289K
95 E300 DIESEL Green Queen 267K SOLD
84 300D 216k SOLD
87 300D 299K #22 head - intercooler - full load adj. - 8sec 0-60mph - SOLD
76 300D 214K SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-05-2007, 09:31 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
If you don't care about the environment, the engine is perfectly happy with a breather.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-05-2007, 09:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Annapolis, Md.
Posts: 556
Well I definately care about the environment. I have veg. soot coming out the exhaust and I am thinking about getting the syntetic plantmot oil from the UK. I think my crankcase may be enviro friendly then??? If I am running a synthetic plant based diesel rated oil in the crankcase am I ok?
__________________
-disav

99 E300 TURBODIESEL Astral Silver 282K - AMG brakes, suspension, monoblocks, speedo & interior - Full Load Maxed on IP by custom Speed Tuning USA Chip - T3/T4 Garrett - EGR/MAF delete
98 E300 TURBODIESEL Alexandrite Green on black leather 289K
95 E300 DIESEL Green Queen 267K SOLD
84 300D 216k SOLD
87 300D 299K #22 head - intercooler - full load adj. - 8sec 0-60mph - SOLD
76 300D 214K SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-05-2007, 09:48 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdisav View Post
If I am running a synthetic plant based diesel rated oil in the crankcase am I ok?
I can't comment on the oil. It does sound as though the vapors would not be harmful, however.

I'm curious as to how you find a synthetic plant based oil that is diesel rated, however???

Maybe others will have more input.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-05-2007, 09:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Annapolis, Md.
Posts: 556
www.dieselveg.com and search for Plantomot. Check it out! It is quite expensive especially being shipped. I hope I am able to get it through a distributor in the US. I am going to ask Alexander at Elsbett in Germany what he knows about it. It is strongly recomended for veg. oil conversions for Direct injected engines.

It really has some amazing properties. It is not easy for me to believe it myself.
__________________
-disav

99 E300 TURBODIESEL Astral Silver 282K - AMG brakes, suspension, monoblocks, speedo & interior - Full Load Maxed on IP by custom Speed Tuning USA Chip - T3/T4 Garrett - EGR/MAF delete
98 E300 TURBODIESEL Alexandrite Green on black leather 289K
95 E300 DIESEL Green Queen 267K SOLD
84 300D 216k SOLD
87 300D 299K #22 head - intercooler - full load adj. - 8sec 0-60mph - SOLD
76 300D 214K SOLD
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-05-2007, 10:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 271
I used a breather in a pinch once, because I switched to a K&N style intake and I was loading my intake with oil to the point that it would barely run sometimes.

I went back to stock and have never been happier with the performance. That intake ended up being about a 200 dollar mistake considering all the money I spent trying to make it work.
__________________
1985 MB 300D/T

Fell off the WVO bandwagon when people started trying to charge $2.50 a gallon for dirty vegetable oil.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-05-2007, 11:17 PM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Just run a 3/4" hose from the valve cover down to about 6" from the ground. Won't harm anything and the "emissions" are negligible unless you have alot of blowby.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-06-2007, 10:35 AM
michakaveli's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 1,719
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
Just run a 3/4" hose from the valve cover down to about 6" from the ground. Won't harm anything and the "emissions" are negligible unless you have alot of blowby.
+ 1

And, it keeps the intake squeeky clean too!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:17 PM
Rashakor's Avatar
Darth Diesel
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Philly PA
Posts: 676
I would actually have a problem with the hose setup.
In an healthy engine, those gases are mostly oil vapors that are catched and recycled through the crankcase.
A simple breather hose would result in an exponential oil consumption (actually not consumed but excreted).
You underbody would also be coated in a thin coat of oil permanently (great for rust control, not-that great for any work on the exhaust or rear suspenssion).

A beefy oil catcher is necessary if you are going to vent the valvecover gases.
__________________
------------------------------------------
Aquilae non capunt muscas! (Eagles don't hunt flies!)


1979 300SD Black/Black MBtex239000mi
1983 300TD euro-NA. White/Olive Cloth-MBtex 201000mi. Fleet car of the USA embassy in Morocco
1983 240D Labrador Blue/Blue MBtex 161000mi
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-06-2007, 12:34 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Miami, FL
Posts: 407
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashakor View Post
I would actually have a problem with the hose setup.
In an healthy engine, those gases are mostly oil vapors that are catched and recycled through the crankcase.
A simple breather hose would result in an exponential oil consumption (actually not consumed but excreted).
You underbody would also be coated in a thin coat of oil permanently (great for rust control, not-that great for any work on the exhaust or rear suspenssion).

A beefy oil catcher is necessary if you are going to vent the valvecover gases.
Yeah, I'd just leave it with the stock set up. These cars are very well disigned from the factory and everything works well in harmony together. I can't think of any cars off the top of my head that have a better reputation for longevity than a Mercedes diesel.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-06-2007, 01:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashakor View Post
I would actually have a problem with the hose setup.
In an healthy engine, those gases are mostly oil vapors that are catched and recycled through the crankcase.
A simple breather hose would result in an exponential oil consumption (actually not consumed but excreted).
You underbody would also be coated in a thin coat of oil permanently (great for rust control, not-that great for any work on the exhaust or rear suspenssion).

A beefy oil catcher is necessary if you are going to vent the valvecover gases.
It's true. I didn't even drop mine down, I kept it up top and it made a HORRIBLE mess of my engine..

__________________
1985 MB 300D/T

Fell off the WVO bandwagon when people started trying to charge $2.50 a gallon for dirty vegetable oil.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page