Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-14-2007, 12:40 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,277
parallel condensor and AC system work - advice request

Hello,

My 85 300D has no charge in it right now, and is still set up for R12.

Whether in the end all I go for an R12 fill or an R134a retrofit (which at this momebt Id likely prefer because of cost and self-servicability), it seems that a new parallel condensor is the smart way to go.

Now, given that the system is 22 years old, still has the original compressor (which works when jumpering the low-p switch), and likely the original oil fill, it seems to me that when the system is worked on, the whole thing will need a solvent flush, etc. prior to closing up and charging.

Given that the parallel flow condensors do not easily flush out, and given that I do not know much about AC work, my question is this:

in the interest of getting what I want, saving a few bucks, and learning about my car, could I purchase the new condensor and install it prior to having the system worked on professionally?

My concern is regarding them working on it by doing the flush, etc. Id hate to have a new condensor ruined by installing it prior to having the system flushed and prepped for r12 or 134.

So, in all, is it smart for me to buy and install a new parallel condensor prior to having the pros go over my system, flush it, determine their reccomendations for r12 vs 134a, etc, or should I just wait until they hav e the car, and get them to install this new condensor after doing other work?

I am not aware enough of the actual order of steps generally taken to know what to do off the top f my head.

Any advice would be appreciated.

Thanks for reading my long post!

Best,

JMH

__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (113k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
1993 300SD (291k)
1993 300D 2.5T (338k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K)
1985 300D (233K)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-14-2007, 01:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 271
I'm actually interested in more information about this too, since I am about to totally rework my AC system
__________________
1985 MB 300D/T

Fell off the WVO bandwagon when people started trying to charge $2.50 a gallon for dirty vegetable oil.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-14-2007, 01:46 PM
Certified Diesel Nut
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Maine
Posts: 78
I'm a little confused what you mean by parallel condensor. My 85 has a straight through... it goes pass. to driver in the front, then pass. to driver in the rear, then to the front again. I just modified mine to make it parallel paths for I'm using if for my intercooler's radiator.

OR, do you have a newer type of condensor?
__________________
1985 300D Mango Green with 16" Pentas, Vogtland springs, Euros/ clear corners, 234k, lots to come soon....
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-14-2007, 10:53 PM
JHZR2's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 5,277
no, the parallel condensor is a different style of condensor from the OE tube-fin design. I would need to buy a universal/generic and utilize it in a retrofit.

Its all in how the flow is divided and contacted with fins for heat transfer.

JMH
__________________
Current Diesels:
1981 240D (73K)
1982 300CD (169k)
1985 190D (169k)
1991 350SD (113k)
1991 350SD (206k)
1991 300D (228k)
1993 300SD (291k)
1993 300D 2.5T (338k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k)
1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k)

Past Diesels:
1983 300D (228K)
1985 300D (233K)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-14-2007, 11:05 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
If you install a parallel flow condenser, you'll flush only the evaporator. You won't need to flush the condenser because it's brand, spanking new!!

I'd definitely consider keeping R-12, or, if cost is the issue, consider one of the hydrocarbon refrigerants, which cool as well as R-12 at a fraction of the cost.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-15-2007, 12:10 AM
Craig
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
FWIW, my system is completely stock with R-12. I just drove from WA state to CO through some 105F temperatures and it cools just fine. Using R-134a with the stock system was not even close to the same performance.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page