Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11-09-2007, 05:58 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad123D View Post
Factory service manual for 615,616,617.91 engines page 05.4-210/3

Subject- Valve adjustment

"Do not turn crankshaft backward"
Here it is in the section on Valve adjustment.

Attached Thumbnails
Once and for all, you engine won't fall apart if you turn it counter clockwise..-rotate.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11-09-2007, 08:16 AM
Registered Diesel Burner
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 2,911
This has never been about the engine possibly running in reverse. I am sure you can never crank a 616 or 617 in either direction fast enough with a ratchet handle to start it.

This is about the timing chain and engine timing. The first issue is the accurate setup of the timing - you can only accomplish that in the forward direction. If you reverse, there is a certain amount of chain slack that will need to be taken up (not much) and the timing will not be the same as in the normal CW direction.

The second issue is potential chain slip on a sprocket. Especially on a 616 engine, because the 616 does not use a ratcheting tensioner. The 616 tensioner only applies significant tension to the timing chain when oil pressure comes up. That's why you can get the chain "rattle of death" on a 240D when it starts up. You hear that and its time for a new chain to go in. There is some tension available from the 616 tensioner due to the spring, but over time that spring weakens somewhat.

The 617 has a ratcheting tensioner, and is less likely to slip a sprocket tooth if turned in reverse. But if you have reached the end of the tensioner ratchet due to an elongated chain, then you are probably more likely to slip a tooth on reverse.

So why take such a risk? Only turn the engine clockwise.

Ken300D
__________________
--------------------------
1982 300D at 351K miles
1984 300SD at 217K miles
1987 300D at 370K miles
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 11-09-2007, 08:52 AM
Slow Attack Submarines
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NYC
Posts: 242
You could pop the clutch on a manual, into reverse gear with the car going forward. I thought I might have heard something about someone doing that in a 240?
__________________
1992 300D 2.5T 249k - Parked with a bad transmission
1981 300SD 142k - Daily driver
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 11-09-2007, 08:53 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ken300D View Post
The second issue is potential chain slip on a sprocket. Especially on a 616 engine, because the 616 does not use a ratcheting tensioner. The 616 tensioner only applies significant tension to the timing chain when oil pressure comes up.


The 617 has a ratcheting tensioner, and is less likely to slip a sprocket tooth if turned in reverse. But if you have reached the end of the tensioner ratchet due to an elongated chain, then you are probably more likely to slip a tooth on reverse.
I'd like a bit of data.

Has anyone slipped a tooth on the camshaft while rotating a 616 or a 617 in reverse???

Due to the tooth engagement, the chain would need a lot of slack for this to occur......but, maybe it's possible on a 616. I don't see any possibility on a 617.

Let's see what we get.............
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 11-09-2007, 10:01 AM
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Woolwich, Maine
Posts: 3,598
I think the issue is where the slack "piles up" on the chain path when you turn the engine over at the crankshaft with the wrench in each direction. If the chain is pulling through the injection pump drive sprocket, and up over the cams, the slack if the chain tensioner isn't really tensioning a lot, is on the chain tensioning rail side of the crank sprocket. The relative positions of the sprockets is always "locked" by the chain because you do not introduce the opportunity for the slack to accumulate between the sprockets. Turn it the other way and the opposite happens, and it is possible the chain and sprockets won't all line up the same when you change directions again. If the chain is pretty used up, the slack can affect timing of the pump. Check how far you can turn the crank in either direction before the camshaft sprocket turns and you will get an idea of what I am talking about. You will get more than a single link of rotation, meaning slack, in the backwards direction on our older engines with worn tensioning rails and stretched chains. Which means you can loose your timing and that is never good. Jim
__________________
Own:
1986 Euro 190E 2.3-16 (291,000 miles),
1998 E300D TurboDiesel, 231,000 miles -purchased with 45,000,
1988 300E 5-speed 252,000 miles,
1983 240D 4-speed, purchased w/136,000, now with 222,000 miles.
2009 ML320CDI Bluetec, 89,000 miles

Owned:
1971 220D (250,000 miles plus, sold to father-in-law),
1975 240D (245,000 miles - died of body rot),
1991 350SD (176,560 miles, weakest Benz I have owned),
1999 C230 Sport (45,400 miles),
1982 240D (321,000 miles, put to sleep)
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 11-09-2007, 11:01 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justfacts View Post
as long as everyone is stimulated challeneged and chiming in thats the ultimate object--
I would have hoped that a professional engineer could have done better than that.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 06-19-2009, 01:38 PM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,416
Answer

Quote:
Originally Posted by Brian Carlton View Post
I'd like a bit of data.

Has anyone slipped a tooth on the camshaft while rotating a 616 or a 617 in reverse???

Due to the tooth engagement, the chain would need a lot of slack for this to occur......but, maybe it's possible on a 616. I don't see any possibility on a 617.

Let's see what we get.............
Yes, I have experienced tooth skip on the 616/617, generally due to a bad/broken chain tensioner and/or guide rail.
The warning is there for good reason.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 06-19-2009, 02:14 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,559
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
You mist beware with that kind of wording. A small increment to you might be 1/4 of a rotation to somebody else.
'1/4 rotation is a small increment. No harm will be done to the engine. '

What freaks me out is no unit designation. 1/4 rotation could be interpreted as '1/4 of a degree' or '90 degree rotation of the crank'. Big difference there. I did rotate mine back maybe a degree. I had a new chain and new guides and tensioners. I was setting it up to put the injection pump back on. The compression kept bumping the crank forward a bit from 24 degree setting.
Tom
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 06-19-2009, 02:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 578
Engines turn backwards a small amount quite frequently. An aborted start attempt, a piston is most of the way up the compression stroke when the starter disengages... what do you think happens? The compression pushes the engine backwards more than a few degrees. Older carburetted gasoline engines FREQUENTLY would run on after they were shut off due to the deteriorating fuel quality at the time. Frequently this "run on" would be with the engine going backwards, resulting in smoke and foul smells coming out of the air cleaner.

Park a manual transmission car on a hill with the tranny in 2nd gear. Steep enough hill... backwards rotation. I bet it has happened to 90% of the manual transmission cars ever made.

I would say that any MB engine without worn out timing chain, tensioner, and rails, can be safely rotated backwards by hand about as much as you'd ever want. Yes, setting timing, etc should only be done with rotation in the correct direction. But if you miss and want to go back 1/4 turn before going forward again, no problem. I always like to rotate an engine several revolutions in the right direction when checking/replacing a timing chain or belt to check my work before calling it "good."
__________________
1987 W201 190D
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:21 PM
moon161's Avatar
Formerly of Car Hell
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 2,057
Kent Bergsma of ********** has warned a bunched timing chain as a consequence of CCW rotation. Got it in one or more of my recipe books from him.
__________________
CC: NSA

All things are burning, know this and be released.

82 Benz 240 D, Kuan Yin
12 Ford Escape 4wd

You're four times
It's hard to
more likely to
concentrate on
have an accident
two things
when you're on
at the same time.
a cell phone.


www.kiva.org It's not like there's anything wrong with feeling good, is there?
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 06-19-2009, 03:31 PM
winmutt's Avatar
85 300D 4spd+tow+h4
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Atl Gawga
Posts: 9,346
I would not do it but as JonL says, it happens in manual transmission cars all the time. I try to always put my trans in the proper gear for the slope its on.
__________________
http://superturbodiesel.com/images/sig.04.10.jpg
1995 E420 Schwarz
1995 E300 Weiss
#1987 300D Sturmmachine
#1991 300D Nearly Perfect
#1994 E320 Cabriolet
#1995 E320 Touring
#1985 300D Sedan
OBK #42
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 06-19-2009, 05:50 PM
mplafleur's Avatar
User Friendly
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Lathrup Village, Michigan
Posts: 2,939
We did have a 240D almost running backwards. It was trying.

We were towing the car forward, not knowing that the car was in reverse.
__________________
Michael LaFleur

'05 E320 CDI - 86,000 miles
'86 300SDL - 360,000 miles
'85 300SD - 150,000 miles (sold)
'89 190D - 120,000 miles (sold)
'85 300SD - 317,000 miles (sold)
'98 ML320 - 270,000 miles (sold)
'75 300D - 170,000 miles (sold)
'83 Harley Davidson FLTC (Broken again) :-(
'61 Plymouth Valiant - 60k mikes
2004 Papillon (Oliver)
2005 Tzitzu (Griffon)
2009 Welsh Corgi (Buba)

Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 06-19-2009, 06:01 PM
Fold on dotted line
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: SE Mich
Posts: 3,284
Quote:
Originally Posted by lietuviai View Post
Never seen one do it. OTH a 2 stroke engine, yes.

Detroit Diesel 8V71 two-stroke bus engines which are all gear driven, can and did run backwards and blow up.

Of the MB diesels and gassers, the only ones that can be turned slightly CCW are the W 136 and OM 636, because they have a gear arrangement only and no timing chain.

I have been told the OM 352 can also, but I have no personal knowledge.

I have an OM 621 190D of 1959 vintage that is so loose that the timing can be slightly turned ccw, but that's due to wear on a engine with 520,000 km or so that is on its last legs.

For the most part, don't do it.

Always check the manual to be sure.
__________________
Strelnik
Invest in America: Buy a Congressman!

1950 170SD
1951 Citroen 11BN
1953 Citroen 11BNF limo
1953 220a project
1959 180D
1960 190D
1960 Borgward Isabella TS 2dr
1983 240D daily driver
1983 380SL
1990 350SDL daily driver alt
3 x Citroen DS21M, down from 5
3 x Citroen 2CV, down from 6
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 06-19-2009, 09:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Sunsites, AZ
Posts: 692
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonL View Post
Park a manual transmission car on a hill with the tranny in 2nd gear. Steep enough hill... backwards rotation. I bet it has happened to 90% of the manual transmission cars ever made.

"
Thats what parking brakes are for . . . us it, or fix it if it does not work, then use it!
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 06-20-2009, 02:08 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Long Island
Posts: 578
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shawn T. W. View Post
Thats what parking brakes are for . . . us it, or fix it if it does not work, then use it!
Of course, but in the "real world," this happens ALL THE TIME to standard transmission cars. Unless it's about ready to break anyway there will be no harm. Also, you know that those ATE brake systems with the little vestigal parking brake shoes inside the rear disc hub aren't worth ****. They barely work when they're perfect, which they seldom are.

__________________
1987 W201 190D
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page