Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 01-11-2008, 12:33 AM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
Transmission fluid change question...

My car has 312,0000+ miles. I am fairly certain it is the original trans. I have at least one entry in my service log for a fluid and filter change. It is no doubt time for it to be changed again.

My question:
Not knowing what kind of fluid as in there now, I am assuming it is not synthetic. Would you switch to a synthetic now?

__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 01-11-2008, 12:39 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: PA
Posts: 5,440
vwbuge,

Sure I would change to synthetic Trans fluid.

P E H
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 01-11-2008, 02:41 AM
europower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oakland California
Posts: 623
Yes

Redline synthetic is some really good stuff,it makes shifting very smooth,in your case i would drain tq and flush it or change again in say 4-5 months just to be sure a lot of super old gunk gets out,sometimes whats in there for so long comes out and your tranny may not like that.
good luck
__________________
W123 1985 300TD naturally aspirated
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 01-11-2008, 07:59 AM
uberwgn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by vwbuge View Post
Would you switch to a synthetic now?

If you know with certainty that the fluid has never been changed, I wouldn't even consider syn fluid, I'd focus on DEXRON only.

The syn fluids typical offer far more cleansing power. If you have signficant build-ups of garbage, this new syn fluid is likely to free up all sorts of bad stuff which will then be circulating in your transmission.

Drain the fluid, examine the pan and filter closely. Does it look bad or is it still fairly clean? Make a trans fluid decision following a visual inspection ... and change that fluid more often!
__________________
1998 W210 diesel (wiped out by a texter)
Baum spring compressor "for rent"
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 01-11-2008, 08:26 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Baton Rouge La
Posts: 2,632
agree...no syn. don't flush... just drain and replace filter
__________________
1989 300ce 129k
( facelifted front,updated tail lights, lowered suspension,bilstein sports, lorinser front spoiler, MOMO steering wheel, remus exhaust,stainless steel brake lines). (Gone)

1997 s320 154k (what a ride). Sold with 179k miles. Replaced with Hyundai Equus

1994 e320 Cabriolet 108k



1972 280se 4.5 153k Owned for 12 yrs, sorry I sold it


[/SIGPIC]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 01-11-2008, 08:32 AM
tobybul's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: West Michigan
Posts: 2,077
Quote:
Originally Posted by uberwgn View Post
If you know with certainty that the fluid has never been changed, I wouldn't even consider syn fluid, I'd focus on DEXRON only.

The syn fluids typical offer far more cleansing power. If you have signficant build-ups of garbage, this new syn fluid is likely to free up all sorts of bad stuff which will then be circulating in your transmission.

Drain the fluid, examine the pan and filter closely. Does it look bad or is it still fairly clean? Make a trans fluid decision following a visual inspection ... and change that fluid more often!
IMHO, there's probably 2 schools of thought on this one. I would put syn in it or at least a blend, in fact, for the cleaning properties of syn. I believe it is good to clean out the build-up in the tranny. I put syn in my 80 & 84 Ds. The shifting improved. Thats why some people use Trans-X.

The other shool-of-thought is what you said.
__________________
the sooner you start... the sooner you'll get done If it ain't broke, don't fix it.. Its always simpler to tell the truth...
2007 Honda Accord EX
2007 Honda Accord SE V6
96 C220
97 Explorer - Found Another Home
2000 Honda Accord V6 - Found Another Home
85 300D - Found Another Home
84 300D - Found Another Home
80 300TD - Found Another Home
Previous cars:
96 Caravan
87 Camry
84 Cressida
82 Vanagon
80 Fiesta
78 Nova
Ford Cortina
Opel Kadet
68 Kombi
Contessa
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 01-11-2008, 08:40 AM
uberwgn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 979
You can rest assured that traditional DEXRON has strong cleaning capability. That's not a weakness by any measure.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 01-11-2008, 10:36 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,673
Iam running Amsoil syn. did the change over at 330940 mIles.
transmission shifts like butter. also replaced the K-1 kit at the
same time.

As far as gunk and debris floating around the trans, maybe that
is what the filter is for? I have been running it 4400 miles so far.

Be sure to drain the torq converter, easy to do. I drained my trans
for about two months, you may not want to take that long to do
the job, but I was replacing the eng. at that time.

As far as leaks, I haven`t noticed any at this time.

Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 01-11-2008, 03:26 PM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
At that kind of mileage don't waste your money on synthetic, whats it going to extend the life a bit, its already worn out Mobil 1 isn't going to fix that. Save the synthetic for when you rebuild it.


Get whatever ATF is on sale at autozoo.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-12-2008, 12:21 AM
vwbuge's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Johnstown, Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,116
What makes you think the trans is worn out? The car runs great. (knocking on wood sound)
__________________
'85 300SD (formerly california emissions)
'08 Chevy Tahoe
'93 Ducati 900 SS
'79 Kawasaki KZ 650
'86 Kawasaki KX 250
'88 Kawasaki KDX200
'71 Hodaka Ace 100
'72 Triumph T100R
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-12-2008, 12:24 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
300k miles, how much more can you expect out of it? I'm sure it shifts fine, mine at 267k shifts pretty damn good to. But it can go at any time.

But its not going to last another 200k miles, and its going to blow at some point synthetic or not.

Its like giving up smoking when you are 95, yeah its going to make a difference!
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-16-2008, 02:30 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Out in the Boonies of Hot, Dry, Dusty, Windy Nevada
Posts: 9,673
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hatterasguy View Post
300k miles, how much more can you expect out of it? I'm sure it shifts fine, mine at 267k shifts pretty damn good to. But it can go at any time.

But its not going to last another 200k miles, and its going to blow at some point synthetic or not.

Its like giving up smoking when you are 95, yeah its going to make a difference!
Well we are up to 335300 so far on the original trans. so maybe synthetic
is a waste of money in your opinion. I have noticed an improvement in
the way it shifts.
so maybe it will crap out tomarrow, and then maybe it will go another
100,000. we`ll see.
you are right it will blow at some point, but if it does, oh well.
I`ll fix it with a 4-speed conversion.

Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616...

1) Not much power
2) Even less power
3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto

Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast.

80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff

We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-16-2008, 02:39 PM
greasybenz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 2,082
Quote:
Originally Posted by uberwgn View Post

The syn fluids typical offer far more cleansing power. If you have signficant build-ups of garbage, this new syn fluid is likely to free up all sorts of bad stuff which will then be circulating in your transmission.
!
So by that your saying put in standard dino dex fluid and just let the build-up and crud stay where it is rather then get cleaned out? I dont understand your logic for that.

As for my suggestion, put in a cheap group 3 synthetic fluid like Valvoline's ATF 'full synthetic' fluid and run it for a shorter amount of time then specified (3 months) to get the build up cleaned out. Then switch to a true Full synthetic like Redline or Amsoil.
__________________
Current:
05 E320 CDI
07 GL320 CDI
08 Sprinter
05 Dodge Cummins
01 Dodge Cummins

Previous
2004 E55 AMG
2002 C32 AMG (#2)
1995 E300
1978 300D
1987 300D
2002 C32 AMG(blown motor :[
1981 300SD
1983 300SD
1987 300SDL
2002 Jetta TDI
1996 S420
1995 S500
1993 190E 2.6
1992 190E 2.3
1985 190E 2.3 5-Speed
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-16-2008, 03:12 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 41
If there isn't any shifting problems and the fluid isn't burned or dirty, I would think twice before doing a full change out with Syn. My opinion is that your transmission depends somewhat on that buildup around pistons to maintain a good seal and pressure. Dissolve too much of that and you could be in trouble.
Stick with what works. She hasn't let you down yet.
__________________
1987 300SDL-268k mi
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-16-2008, 03:33 PM
uberwgn's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: New England
Posts: 979
Quote:
Originally Posted by greasybenz View Post
So by that your saying put in standard dino dex fluid and just let the build-up and crud stay where it is rather then get cleaned out? I dont understand your logic for that.

The cleaning process would be more gradual.

Let's keep in mind, I'm only suggesting using the product the factory specified. I'm not charting any new territory with the recommendation.

I'd say there is an certain amount of "unknown" when working with a neglected transmission that has never been maintained.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:40 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page