|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Tough decision! 87 or 95
OK, I am dying to get into a newer Benz. I found an 87 with just over 200,000 miles, head was replaced about 10 years ago, evaporator replaced more recently. Garage kept, paint and interior look great (from pictures), also new glow plugs and relay. The 95 has 238,000 highway miles. Evaporator replaced last year. Interior could use a new armrest on the console. The paint is a little "chalked". Has a small, dime sized rust spot near the window on back door. Maintained by dealer until two years ago. Price is nearly identical for either.
In the pictures, the 87 looks better, but is 8 years older. I want something that I can keep for years to come. Advice, suggestions? Both are about 300 miles away in opposite directions. Thanks!
__________________
Wayne the triumph of evil requires only that good men stand by and do nothing 13 Audi A3 TDI, the Wife's! 85 190D 5 speed, 195,000 miles 75 Triumph TR 6 w/Toyota 5 speed 2000 Ford F-250 powerstroke 03 Ml500, 109000 |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
If you have the time, this is a situation where I would probably drive both and see what you like better. Parting with the time and $100 of fuel is better than buying a car that you may find out in the future wasn't the best choice for you.
__________________
Dale http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1...MG_2277sig.jpg 1990 300D 2.5 Turbo -155k 2000 E430 - 103k 2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ecodiesel 4x4 - 11k 2014 VW Passat TDI SE - 7k Bro's Diesel 2006 E320 CDI - 128k Pop's Benz Pre-glow - A moment of silence in honor of Rudolph Diesel |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
For a driver, I'd suggest the '95. I like both, but you've got a newer car, if all else is the same, and a few nice features that the '87 doesn't have. If you live or drive frequently at high altitude go with the '87, you can use the turbo.
Either one could be a cherry, either one could be a lemon, and you won't know until you get there, I've done it too many times to expect otherwise. If you can get records faxed/emailed to you to show that the history is real, that's a good start. Also, I believe that '95 is still in the bad wiring harness era, ask if the engine wiring harness has been replaced.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
My vote is the 87, but I'm a bit biased. The turbo 603 pulls very strong at any rpm and speed. It is also from the simpler to work on era if you turn your own wrench. The only thing computer controlled is the idle.
The 606 has such technical gizmos as variable length intake runners and other trickery to get near turbo performance and better fuel economy, but at a cost of not so simple to work on. You see both on ebay with over 350,000 miles with regularity so the longevity is what one would expect from a benz.
__________________
1959 Gravely LI, 1963 Gravely L8, 1973 Gravely C12 1982 380SL 1978 450 SEL 6.9 euro restoration at 63% and climbing 1987 300 D 2005 CDI European Delivery 2006 CDI Handed down to daughter 2007 GL CDI. Wifes |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
Is the 95 an E300D or a S350D? Is the 87 a 300D or a 300SDL?
-Jim
__________________
1995 S350D, Green with black leather interior. Bought January 2008 w/ 233,xxx miles. I did 22,000 miles during the first year of ownership. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
95 E300D and 87 300D.
__________________
Wayne the triumph of evil requires only that good men stand by and do nothing 13 Audi A3 TDI, the Wife's! 85 190D 5 speed, 195,000 miles 75 Triumph TR 6 w/Toyota 5 speed 2000 Ford F-250 powerstroke 03 Ml500, 109000 |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Go with the one that's better cared for. How about do a PPI on both and compare results.
The 95 has more safety features like a passenger side airbag and likely ASR, if those things matter to you. You really should throw a 300D 2.5 in the mix just to make the decision more difficult Sixto 87 300D |
#8
|
||||
|
||||
An interesting choice. I have an '87 300D and a '96 E300D (same M606 engine as the '95 in the later W210 body). I just had the intake of the 606 all apart to clean it and replace the #2 glow plug. It's not that complicated; given that the '87 has a turbo and lots more vacuum plumbing, I'd say the engines are a wash as regards difficulty of servicing. The 603 is more powerful, the 606 is more economical.
With a slight lean towards the '95 (newer), I'd go with the one that had better records and seemed to have been cared for more. Let us know which you choose! Jeremy
__________________
"Buster" in the '95 Our all-Diesel family 1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car 2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022) Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762 "Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz." -- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970 |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
I'd go with the 87.. Its slightly easier to work on..and... the W124 was probably the last great Mercedes...
(But of course the W123 was truly the last "indestructible" Mercedes) Jeremy.. when ever referencing a diesel engine use, for example, OM6xx. Not M6xx M- denotes a gas burner OM- Denotes Oel Motor or a Diesel as we know |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Go with the 1995. I think the face lifted W124 looks much better than the older ones, plus since 95 was the last year its fully sorted out.
Both are good engines, but the 606 is better than the 603.
__________________
1999 SL500 1969 280SE 2023 Ram 1500 2007 Tiara 3200 |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Answer:
Expect this issue on the 1995.
MB Wiring Harness Failure http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=128181 Have a great day.
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic asemastermechanic@juno.com Prototype R&D/testing: Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician. Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH). Dynamometer. Heat exchanger durability. HV-A/C Climate Control. Vehicle build. Fleet Durability Technical Quality Auditor. Automotive Technical Writer 1985 300SD 1983 300D 1984 190D 2003 Volvo V70 2002 Honda Civic https://www.boldegoist.com/ |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|