Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-08-2008, 07:31 PM
M/S Science Teacher
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Millen, Ga
Posts: 146
Tough decision! 87 or 95

OK, I am dying to get into a newer Benz. I found an 87 with just over 200,000 miles, head was replaced about 10 years ago, evaporator replaced more recently. Garage kept, paint and interior look great (from pictures), also new glow plugs and relay. The 95 has 238,000 highway miles. Evaporator replaced last year. Interior could use a new armrest on the console. The paint is a little "chalked". Has a small, dime sized rust spot near the window on back door. Maintained by dealer until two years ago. Price is nearly identical for either.

In the pictures, the 87 looks better, but is 8 years older. I want something that I can keep for years to come.

Advice, suggestions? Both are about 300 miles away in opposite directions.

Thanks!

__________________
Wayne

the triumph of evil requires only that good men stand by and do nothing

13 Audi A3 TDI, the Wife's!
85 190D 5 speed, 195,000 miles
75 Triumph TR 6 w/Toyota 5 speed
2000 Ford F-250 powerstroke
03 Ml500, 109000
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-08-2008, 08:49 PM
2.5Turbo's Avatar
602 648 113 A630
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 900
Quote:
Originally Posted by dwayneb View Post
OK, I am dying to get into a newer Benz. I found an 87 with just over 200,000 miles, head was replaced about 10 years ago, evaporator replaced more recently. Garage kept, paint and interior look great (from pictures), also new glow plugs and relay. The 95 has 238,000 highway miles. Evaporator replaced last year. Interior could use a new armrest on the console. The paint is a little "chalked". Has a small, dime sized rust spot near the window on back door. Maintained by dealer until two years ago. Price is nearly identical for either.

In the pictures, the 87 looks better, but is 8 years older. I want something that I can keep for years to come.

Advice, suggestions? Both are about 300 miles away in opposite directions.

Thanks!
Tough decision. The 87 has a little more power with the turbo and is simpler to work on. The head has been replaced, so that problem is out the window. The 95 has more modern styling, slightly better fuel economy, and more comfort and convenience items. The 606 in the 95 has been known to have glow plugs stick in the head. Both have had the evap replaced, so that's not a concern either. I would lean toward the 95, only because it's 8 years newer. Accessories and electronic items will last longer.

If you have the time, this is a situation where I would probably drive both and see what you like better. Parting with the time and $100 of fuel is better than buying a car that you may find out in the future wasn't the best choice for you.
__________________
Dale

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1...MG_2277sig.jpg

1990 300D 2.5 Turbo -155k
2000 E430 - 103k
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ecodiesel 4x4 - 11k
2014 VW Passat TDI SE - 7k Bro's Diesel
2006 E320 CDI - 128k Pop's Benz


Pre-glow - A moment of silence in honor of Rudolph Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-08-2008, 09:30 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
For a driver, I'd suggest the '95. I like both, but you've got a newer car, if all else is the same, and a few nice features that the '87 doesn't have. If you live or drive frequently at high altitude go with the '87, you can use the turbo.

Either one could be a cherry, either one could be a lemon, and you won't know until you get there, I've done it too many times to expect otherwise.

If you can get records faxed/emailed to you to show that the history is real, that's a good start. Also, I believe that '95 is still in the bad wiring harness era, ask if the engine wiring harness has been replaced.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-08-2008, 09:52 PM
Wodnek's Avatar
Vintage Mercedes Junkie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Southeast Wisconsin
Posts: 1,661
My vote is the 87, but I'm a bit biased. The turbo 603 pulls very strong at any rpm and speed. It is also from the simpler to work on era if you turn your own wrench. The only thing computer controlled is the idle.

The 606 has such technical gizmos as variable length intake runners and other trickery to get near turbo performance and better fuel economy, but at a cost of not so simple to work on.

You see both on ebay with over 350,000 miles with regularity so the longevity is what one would expect from a benz.
__________________
1959 Gravely LI, 1963 Gravely L8, 1973 Gravely C12
1982 380SL
1978 450 SEL 6.9 euro restoration at 63% and climbing
1987 300 D
2005 CDI European Delivery
2006 CDI Handed down to daughter
2007 GL CDI. Wifes

Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-08-2008, 10:52 PM
Jadavis's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 995
Is the 95 an E300D or a S350D? Is the 87 a 300D or a 300SDL?

-Jim
__________________
1995 S350D, Green with black leather interior.
Bought January 2008 w/ 233,xxx miles.
I did 22,000 miles during the first year of ownership.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-08-2008, 10:53 PM
M/S Science Teacher
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Millen, Ga
Posts: 146
95 E300D and 87 300D.
__________________
Wayne

the triumph of evil requires only that good men stand by and do nothing

13 Audi A3 TDI, the Wife's!
85 190D 5 speed, 195,000 miles
75 Triumph TR 6 w/Toyota 5 speed
2000 Ford F-250 powerstroke
03 Ml500, 109000
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-08-2008, 11:25 PM
sixto's Avatar
smoke gets in your eyes
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: Eastern TN
Posts: 20,841
Go with the one that's better cared for. How about do a PPI on both and compare results.

The 95 has more safety features like a passenger side airbag and likely ASR, if those things matter to you.

You really should throw a 300D 2.5 in the mix just to make the decision more difficult

Sixto
87 300D
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-08-2008, 11:34 PM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
An interesting choice. I have an '87 300D and a '96 E300D (same M606 engine as the '95 in the later W210 body). I just had the intake of the 606 all apart to clean it and replace the #2 glow plug. It's not that complicated; given that the '87 has a turbo and lots more vacuum plumbing, I'd say the engines are a wash as regards difficulty of servicing. The 603 is more powerful, the 606 is more economical.

With a slight lean towards the '95 (newer), I'd go with the one that had better records and seemed to have been cared for more.

Let us know which you choose!

Jeremy
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-08-2008, 11:35 PM
TheDon's Avatar
Ghost of Diesels Past
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 13,285
I'd go with the 87.. Its slightly easier to work on..and... the W124 was probably the last great Mercedes...

(But of course the W123 was truly the last "indestructible" Mercedes)


Jeremy.. when ever referencing a diesel engine use, for example, OM6xx. Not M6xx

M- denotes a gas burner

OM- Denotes Oel Motor or a Diesel as we know
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-09-2008, 12:42 AM
Hatterasguy's Avatar
Zero
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Milford, CT
Posts: 19,318
Go with the 1995. I think the face lifted W124 looks much better than the older ones, plus since 95 was the last year its fully sorted out.

Both are good engines, but the 606 is better than the 603.
__________________
1999 SL500
1969 280SE
2023 Ram 1500
2007 Tiara 3200
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-09-2008, 01:01 AM
whunter's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Metro Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 17,416
Answer:

Expect this issue on the 1995.


MB Wiring Harness Failure
http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=128181








Have a great day.

__________________
ASE Master Mechanic
asemastermechanic@juno.com

Prototype R&D/testing:
Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician.
Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH).
Dynamometer.
Heat exchanger durability.
HV-A/C Climate Control.
Vehicle build.
Fleet Durability
Technical Quality Auditor.
Automotive Technical Writer

1985 300SD
1983 300D
1984 190D
2003 Volvo V70
2002 Honda Civic

https://www.boldegoist.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page