|
|
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
I don't agree that the 124 is hard to control at high speeds, at least not if properly maintained. I used to run my 4matic flat-out for long distances, it felt the same at 125 as it did at 65mph, just the needles pointing to different numbers.
Now they're old, many/most of them need shocks, bushings, and proper tires, 124s can handle loose and so can the 126 if they're worn-out. Personally I like the look of the 123, just like I liked the look of my TR6. But, I wouldn't drive a 123, too slow and soggy, and nothing about the creature comforts appeal to me. Before the 124 I was an Audi and BMW man, much more modern handling and driving in the mid-'80s. When the 124 came along to catch M-B up with the rest of Europe, I made the change. The 126 I like okay, but I like the 140 more. The problem with them for me is simple preference: I don't like cars that take up that much space in my garage since it's usually just me driving it. '96 is a fine year, I like the '98/'99 E320D a lot more than the '96/97, would take a new CDI in a heartbeat if business were (much) better. To each their own. Many times refinement, power, and comfort bring increased complexity. An air-cooled Beetle is much simpler to operate and maintain, but I wouldn't go back to one.
__________________
Gone to the dark side - Jeff |
Bookmarks |
|
|