Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-27-2008, 04:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
whats the best (1980-2000) mechanical injection mercedes turbo diesel and why

Whats the best Mercedes diesel and why?

Specifically only mechanical injection engines.

Priorities:

1. power/torque and reliability (equally) and engine can be modified if mods don't include tearing into the long block to replace pistons/con rods etc.

2. all other things (ease of availability, weight, size, whatever)

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-27-2008, 05:11 PM
92 300D 2.5L OBK #59
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 1,108
WOW.. Your gona open a can of worms with that one....
__________________
92 300D 2.5L OM602 OBK #59
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-27-2008, 05:31 PM
bgkast's Avatar
Rollin' on 16s
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Vancouver WA
Posts: 6,528
I would say 617 for reliability and availability, and 603 for power, ease of modification and weight. Both do not require long-block modifications for power increase, but the head is a power limiter on the 617.
__________________
1979 240D- 316K miles - VGT Turbo, Intercooler, Stick Shift, Many Other Mods - Daily Driver

1982 300SD - 232K miles - Wife's Daily Driver

1986 560SL - Wife's red speed machine
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-27-2008, 05:37 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
Why, this is an opinion based question, but if someone can't justify their opinion then its meaningless to me.

Quote:
Originally Posted by bobodaclown View Post
WOW.. Your gona open a can of worms with that one....
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-27-2008, 06:04 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, CA & 1,150 miles S of Key West
Posts: 4,874
606.962 cause it the newest generation and most powerful engine complying with your critiria.

Easily modified by chipping it. Can go from 177hp upwards of 225hp if you want.

Course if it has anything to do with your diesel/gas swap thread you're gonna need to be a computer programmer or to dump the ECU and IP and stick a 603 IP on it instead. Then of course it can't be chipped. Should still have more HP than the others.
__________________
Terry Allison
N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama

09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA)
09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.)
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-27-2008, 10:06 PM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
If by mechanical you mean no computer control necessary, I say 603. Good durable engine will last many miles with minimal maintenance, quieter, more efficient, and smoother than the old iron-head engines, cross-flow head, hydraulic lifters, more power, ... if you consider the 606 to be mechanical, I'd take the 606 turbo over the 603 in a heartbeat, more fuel efficient and more power.
__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-27-2008, 11:08 PM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
IMO, the best Mercedes Diesel would be a combination of a 606 turbo engine and a 603 mechanical injection pump like Terry said. The 606 is an awesome engine - smooth, 24 valves and the 603 IP would give you mechanical simplicity and allow for traditional mods like timing advance and fueling.
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2008, 01:16 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
I have no doubt that this would be the best engine combination, I also have no doubt that an 606 turbo can't be found for less than 3500 dollars. A quick search of a junkyard parts locater found a couple 606 NA engines in the 2500-3000 dollar range.

So how about a comparison between the 617 and 603.

Which model year 603 is reliable?

Can the 603 be made as reliable as a 617?

It just occurs to me that if the 603 bends rods as it comes stock, than it can't be too reliable when pushed harder, at least not without tearing into the engine, to replace the rods.



Quote:
Originally Posted by KarTek View Post
IMO, the best Mercedes Diesel would be a combination of a 606 turbo engine and a 603 mechanical injection pump like Terry said. The 606 is an awesome engine - smooth, 24 valves and the 603 IP would give you mechanical simplicity and allow for traditional mods like timing advance and fueling.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-28-2008, 01:47 AM
2.5Turbo's Avatar
602 648 113 A630
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Tacoma, WA
Posts: 900
Only the 603.97x 3.5L engines bend rods. The 603.96x 3.0L engines don't, but most from 86-87 (the years they were imported to the US) have the #14 head which has the tendency to crack if overheated. Any 603.96x with a #17 head or higher is a good engine. If you want a good mix of fuel efficiency and power, do a 602.96x. If solid fuel efficiency is what you're after, the 601 mated to a 5 speed offered in the 190D 2.2 nets upwards of 40mpg.

The 60x engines have a crossflow head which offers more power and efficiency over the 617 head.

The 617 will be more tolerant to abuse like overheating. But compared to the 60x it will be louder, less powerful, less efficient, and harder to modify.

And I agree with the 606 crowd on this thread...get a 606 with a 603 IP and you'll have an engine that will be hard to beat in the MB diesel lineup, save the CDI's.
__________________
Dale

http://i52.photobucket.com/albums/g1...MG_2277sig.jpg

1990 300D 2.5 Turbo -155k
2000 E430 - 103k
2014 Jeep Grand Cherokee Ecodiesel 4x4 - 11k
2014 VW Passat TDI SE - 7k Bro's Diesel
2006 E320 CDI - 128k Pop's Benz


Pre-glow - A moment of silence in honor of Rudolph Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-28-2008, 03:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 49
Ok, this is good info, especially on the 603.

If I can find a 603 3.0 at a good price I will probably buy it.

Whats the max reliable performance out of a 603 without, opening the block or doing anything crazy like spending 2k dollars on the injection pump.

I would do stuff like an intercooler, 3in turbo back exhaust, injectors, with and adjustments for more fuel, could make a custom exhaust manifold and use a properly matched turbo, maybe a gt25 .63 something cheap like that.


Quote:
Originally Posted by 2.5Turbo View Post
Only the 603.97x 3.5L engines bend rods. The 603.96x 3.0L engines don't, but most from 86-87 (the years they were imported to the US) have the #14 head which has the tendency to crack if overheated. Any 603.96x with a #17 head or higher is a good engine. If you want a good mix of fuel efficiency and power, do a 602.96x. If solid fuel efficiency is what you're after, the 601 mated to a 5 speed offered in the 190D 2.2 nets upwards of 40mpg.

The 60x engines have a crossflow head which offers more power and efficiency over the 617 head.

The 617 will be more tolerant to abuse like overheating. But compared to the 60x it will be louder, less powerful, less efficient, and harder to modify.

And I agree with the 606 crowd on this thread...get a 606 with a 603 IP and you'll have an engine that will be hard to beat in the MB diesel lineup, save the CDI's.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 02-28-2008, 04:11 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
for me the 603, though more powerful and smoother is so much more delicate and high maintenance that I would much prefer the simpler, more durable, less fiinicky 617.

No comparison.

Tom W
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 02-28-2008, 06:13 AM
AHH,What's up Doc????
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,212
Are we talking about Mercedes Benz only? Because if were not, my choice would be the 617 for the ultimate durability. Other than Benz, The Cummins 12 Valve P-7100 5.9 series diesel from late 1993 to early 1999 found in the Dodge Ram.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 02-28-2008, 06:16 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
I'll take a 606 with a Myna pump over any of the others.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 02-28-2008, 09:34 AM
KarTek's Avatar
<- Ryuko of Kill La Kill
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Bahama/Eno Twp, NC
Posts: 3,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
I'll take a 606 with a Myna pump over any of the others.
No doubt, I would too If they had an IP that was compatable with the 210 electronics!

We are talking about something affordable though...
__________________
-Evan


Benz Fleet:
1968 UNIMOG 404.114
1998 E300
2008 E63


Non-Benz Fleet:
1992 Aerostar
1993 MR2
2000 F250
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 02-28-2008, 10:41 AM
babymog's Avatar
Loose Cannon - No Balls
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Northeast Indiana
Posts: 10,765
Other than few examples on this forum of cracked or leaking heads (rare and usually neglected/abused), I'm not aware of anything on the 603 that is more delicate or high-maintenance. Reading this forum has indicated that the 617 has maintenance issues, harder to start, glow-plug problems, valve adjustments, compression issues, oil pump and fuel pump issues, ... seems pretty much like the 617 gets a lot more press here for problems.

I read this forum regularly, and scan every time for anything 603 related. Other than constant warnings that the heads will crack and those who counter that they have original heads with 250,000 - 350,000 on them, pretty much nothing comes up. Same with the 124, same problems (HVAC, suspension, vacuum) as the 123, but those with the older iron sure swear they're junk after '85 LOL.

Seems that I read here that the IP is only good for about 180hp or so without substantial mods.

Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
for me the 603, though more powerful and smoother is so much more delicate and high maintenance that I would much prefer the simpler, more durable, less fiinicky 617.

No comparison.

Tom W

__________________

Gone to the dark side

- Jeff
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:46 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page