Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 07-20-2008, 07:38 PM
kahlil88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mendocino, CA
Posts: 307
Question Low sulfur diesel bad for older cars?

A friend told me that low sulfur diesel is designed for newer vehicles, and that it's bad for older cars (such as my '83 300DT). Is this true, and why or why not?

__________________
1985 190D 2.2L 717.411 5-speed
1983 300D Euro OM617.950

Last edited by kahlil88; 10-21-2008 at 06:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 07-20-2008, 07:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 4,263
The sulfur level isn't what is the problem, but rather the means used to remove that sulfur. It also reduces lubricity. However, additives are used to bring it back. Still, there are fewer aromatics in the resulting mix, and swollen seals just might shrink and allow (easily fixed) leaks.

If you're worried about lubricity, run at least 2% biodiesel in the mix.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 07-20-2008, 09:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Walnut Creek, CA & 1,150 miles S of Key West
Posts: 4,874
In CA you've been burning it for more than 1.5 years. ASTM specs for lubricity didn't change. Non issue.
__________________
Terry Allison
N. Calif. & Boca Chica, Panama

09' E320 Bluetec 77k (USA)
09' Hyundai Santa Fe Diesel 48k (S.A.)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 07-21-2008, 01:14 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No, its not true. Its marketing hype made to sell useless fuel additives.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 07-21-2008, 01:48 AM
kahlil88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mendocino, CA
Posts: 307
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
No, its not true. Its marketing hype made to sell useless fuel additives.
Oddly enough, my friend also recommended using diesel additives. So is lubricity an issue or not, and what is this I'm hearing about leaks?
__________________
1985 190D 2.2L 717.411 5-speed
1983 300D Euro OM617.950

Last edited by kahlil88; 10-21-2008 at 06:04 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 07-21-2008, 01:58 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by kahlil88 View Post
So is lubricity an issue or not
No, your injection pump is lubricated by engine oil.

Quote:
what is this I'm hearing about leaks?
That does not apply to your model. The leaks are the rubber o-rings on the delivery valves of the later injection pump models (86+), your pump uses copper crush washers. The leaks on the later pumps are actually caused by normal age and heat-cycling stress. Its being blamed on ULSD because it conveniently switched into use around the same time a few people started having leaks, a scapegoat.

The fuel has minimum standards for lubricity that it must meet before it even leaves the refinery. On top of that, the stations all add their own blend of additives to the fuel as its pumped into the transport truck.

If there was actually a problem with the fuel there would be FAR more people with leaks than the few isolated reports so far.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 07-21-2008, 02:12 AM
husk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: orange county, CA
Posts: 504
I get injector knocking when I use ULSD, when I switched to bio injector knocking was gone. The engine is much quieter on non-ulsd/bio as well.

On ULSD I could definitely tell that my engine was on at idle, on BIO/non-ulsd I can't even tell if the engine is on, I have to keep looking at my tach to make sure. Its a HUGE difference.
__________________
2005 SL65
1999 E300
1995 E300
1994 SL320
1988 560SL
1987 300TD
1982 300D
1955 300SL
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 07-21-2008, 02:14 AM
kahlil88's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Mendocino, CA
Posts: 307
Thanks for the info. I guess my friend was misinformed. Glad I don't have to worry! Penn & Teller ought to tackle this issue on the next episode of Bull****!
__________________
1985 190D 2.2L 717.411 5-speed
1983 300D Euro OM617.950

Last edited by kahlil88; 10-21-2008 at 06:05 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 07-21-2008, 02:17 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by husk View Post
I get injector knocking when I use ULSD, when I switched to bio injector knocking was gone. The engine is much quieter on non-ulsd/bio as well.
That means you have an injector problem that needs to be fixed, bio is only masking your symptoms.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 07-21-2008, 02:46 AM
H-townbenzoboy's Avatar
Now Y2K Compliant
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMAllison View Post
In CA you've been burning it for more than 1.5 years.
Possibly over 20 yrs, some parts of CA have used ULSD since 1985.
__________________
'81 MB 300SD, '82 MB 300D Turbo (sold/RIP), '04 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate

Sooner or later every car falls apart, ours does it later!
-German Narrator in a MB Promotion Film about the then brand new W123.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 07-21-2008, 03:22 AM
husk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: orange county, CA
Posts: 504
its well documented that ULSD causes problems in older diesels (mainly non CRD type motors).
__________________
2005 SL65
1999 E300
1995 E300
1994 SL320
1988 560SL
1987 300TD
1982 300D
1955 300SL
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-21-2008, 03:25 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
No it isn't. Its all been circumstantial, people blame problems on the ULSD because its a convenient excuse.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-21-2008, 03:31 AM
H-townbenzoboy's Avatar
Now Y2K Compliant
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by ForcedInduction View Post
No it isn't. Its all been circumstantial, people blame problems on the ULSD because its a convenient excuse.
Other makes that depend on fuel to lubricate their IPs have reported instances of wear or damage from bad batches of ULSD.
__________________
'81 MB 300SD, '82 MB 300D Turbo (sold/RIP), '04 Lincoln Town Car Ultimate

Sooner or later every car falls apart, ours does it later!
-German Narrator in a MB Promotion Film about the then brand new W123.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-21-2008, 03:35 AM
ForcedInduction
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Quote:
Originally Posted by H-townbenzoboy View Post
bad batches of ULSD.
Key words there. ANY batch of bad fuel can cause problems. The fact that only a small number of vehicles have had problems means its not a problem for everyone. For every one person that reports a problem there are hundreds running trouble free.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-21-2008, 09:04 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 1,392
i sold my 86 sdl to my girlfriends kid,the only fuel i ever ran in it was bio. he on the other hand would buy his fuel at wal-mart.within about a month his delivery valve seals started leaking.i told him to start running bio.but the only place here in town you need a fuel or credit card.so for the last 3 months he pays me and i use my card.within a week the leaks dried up.so i don't care what people say about ulsd not being the issue.i know it is.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:35 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page