Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-16-2009, 04:33 AM
europower's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Oakland California
Posts: 623
ca diesel law

Does anybody here know if the new ca law affecting trucks and buses will have any effect over our cars? Just wandering because i just saw a guy selling his diesel on Craigslist and he says car wont be abole to be driven as of next month due to new ca emmisions law, maybe hes wrong or maybe i havent heard right i just was on http://www.arb.ca.gov/msprog/onrdiesel/onrdiesel.htm and i didnt see anything regarding cars
Thank you boys and girls, women and children and all of the above.

__________________
W123 1985 300TD naturally aspirated
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-16-2009, 07:30 AM
RUN-EM's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 313
Ah, Yes, the Gold coast.....

Ah, yes, the Gold Coast stikes again. Your gold, their coast. Good luck dealing with the bas....rds of the state's rank and file. Ya, know, Obamma fired GMs CEO in order to achieve a more progressive attitude in running that company. Trouble is, that CEO was one of the most progressive guys in the last 30 years or so. However, there is a fine point Obamma may have missed. We change Presidents of the US every four years, barring impeachment or death. Is the Fed. govt. any better for this? Not in my lifetime (I' m 64). Big institutions, the fed.govt., GM (etc.), and big states (Cali.) just won't change till you get down to the rank and file that run the place.

However, I think you should not worry about your diesel ride. Just keep on running till they pry the keys "from your cold dead hands" ala Charlton Heston.

Good luck

Regards

Run-Em
__________________
1983 300SD - SPARKY THE DIESEL
2004 Audi TT 3.2 Quattro Roadster
1999 SLK - aka - LIL RED
1956 Chevy Nomad - aka - REAL MAD
1940 Ford dbl dr. Deluxe - aka - ORANGE U GLAD
1998 Kawasaki Nomad bike --
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-16-2009, 08:31 AM
C Sean Watts's Avatar
NOCH EIN PILS!!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: NC
Posts: 1,318
Straight from the article

Affected vehicles include on-road heavy-duty diesel fueled vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds, yard trucks with off-road certified engines, and diesel fueled shuttle vehicles of any GVWR. Out-of-state trucks and buses that operate in California are also subject to the regulation.


So, with this description cars are not included. MY question is (coming from a CDL holder's point of view) when did 14,000 lbs become "heavy duty?" Because if I am to understand this, a farmer with an F-250 and a horse trailer is screwed. Also, can some cockamamie neo-socialist include a privately owned car as a 'shuttle vehicle' or is that to mean school and church buses?
__________________
1987 300D (230,000 mi on a #14 head-watching the temp gauge and keeping the ghost in the machine)
Raleigh NC - Home of deep fried sushi!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-16-2009, 09:43 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 137
8500lb is the EPA reg weight limit for "medium duty"...

hence why the 3/4 ton and heavier pick ups have diesels, the 1/2 tons don't - different set of regulations.

I'm not 100% on this - but as I recall - there is another reg difference at 14k, I think at that point the EPA certs are done on engine dyno's - as so many of those vehicles are sold as incompletes and end up with different "bodies" on the back - and therefore different aerodynamics - it would be nearly impossible to road coast down all the different body combinations which would be required for a chassis dyno cert.

Just more evidence to me that the "green states" are getting further out of touch with reality. I don't think any politician realizes the amount of cost involved in having multiple regulations - test equipment is expensive - takes months/years to design install and prove out, and is expensive to run and maintain once online.... not to mention all the engineering and technician time required to run all the calibrations and tests required to pass said regs.... there should be ONE SET of FEDERAL regs - the States should never have been allowed to impose thier own. Come to think of it - it sure would be nice if the European Union would sit down with the US EPA and figure out a "global standard" - now THAT would be efficient! and hopefully we'd see more of europes slick diesels over here!

sorry - off soap box.
__________________
95 E300 Diesel 265k and counting
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-16-2009, 11:56 AM
Jeremy5848's Avatar
Registered Biodiesel User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Sonoma Wine Country
Posts: 8,402
There was a thread here a few weeks ago, something to the effect that 1997 and newer diesels would have to have a bi-annual smog check similar to the ones that gassers have now. I can't find the link now.

[rant] The diesels that really need cleaning up are large trucks, off-road (construction and farm) equipment, stationary engines (generators), and railroad locomotives. Diesel cars are a drop in the bucket. The politicians pick on them because we aren't organized and don't have the political influence that the truckers do. Then the politicians can say "we're doing something about pollution." [/rant]

Jeremy
__________________

"Buster" in the '95

Our all-Diesel family
1996 E300D (W210) . .338,000 miles Wife's car
2005 E320 CDI . . 113,000 miles My car
Santa Rosa population 176,762 (2022)
Total. . . . . . . . . . . . 627,762
"Oh lord won't you buy me a Mercedes Benz."
-- Janis Joplin, October 1, 1970
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:21 PM
sd300td's Avatar
huh?
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,116
Quote:
Originally Posted by C Sean Watts View Post
Affected vehicles include on-road heavy-duty diesel fueled vehicles with a gross vehicle weight rating (GVWR) greater than 14,000 pounds, yard trucks with off-road certified engines, and diesel fueled shuttle vehicles of any GVWR. Out-of-state trucks and buses that operate in California are also subject to the regulation.


So, with this description cars are not included. MY question is (coming from a CDL holder's point of view) when did 14,000 lbs become "heavy duty?" Because if I am to understand this, a farmer with an F-250 and a horse trailer is screwed. Also, can some cockamamie neo-socialist include a privately owned car as a 'shuttle vehicle' or is that to mean school and church buses?
Trailers arent' vehicles. Nor are they diesel powered.
__________________
1982 240 D, 308,000 - 321,127 miles (sold)
1982 300 TD,166,500 - 226,000 miles
1998 E 320, 120,000 - 144,000 miles
2005 C 230 K, 26,000 - 77,000 miles (sold)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:23 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,234
This comment is slightly off subject; but here in CA maybe 1-2 times a year I have seen Road Side Check Points (in the City not on the Freeway) where they were pulling Cars over and spot checking if and smog related stuff was disconnected or modified.

In the Forum there has often been Threads/Posts concerning the removal or rendering disfunctional EGRs.

In an inspection an EGR removed would be obvious and they know to check for a "BB" in the Vacuum Hoses as this is also a common thing that people do on Gas engined cars (I used to have a Test and Rapair Lics and the BB thing is in their manual of what to look for).

I expect that some day the random inspections will be common place.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:31 PM
blackestate's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Washington State
Posts: 948
If I were a company that moved freight, I would be looking north, and moving my business, as opposed to replacing all of my equipment, only to have them continue, with what ever they decide to do next!
__________________
83 300SD Dark Silver Dark brown inside
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:31 PM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeremy5848 View Post
There was a thread here a few weeks ago, something to the effect that 1997 and newer diesels would have to have a bi-annual smog check similar to the ones that gassers have now. I can't find the link now.
Jeremy
We already have that here in WA state but for vehicles 25 years and newer. All they do is check opacity of the exhaust. I'm sure the peoples republic of Kali will think of something stricter to screw with the people.
__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-16-2009, 12:32 PM
Doktor Bert's Avatar
Das Sturm Uberdoktor
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Palm Springs, CA.
Posts: 2,670
Wow...

I had a CA smog license until 2000 and even then, word of impending diesel inspections was discussed in my classes...Robert
__________________
Did you just pass my 740 at 200 kmh in a 300SD?????

1978 300SD 'Phil' - 1,315,853 Miles And Counting - 1, 317,885 as of 12/27/2012 - 1,333,000 as of 05/10/2013, 1,337,850 as of July 15, 2013, 1,339,000 as of August 13, 2013



100,000 miles since June 2005 Overhaul - Sold January 25th, 2014 After 1,344,246 Miles & 20 Years of Ownership
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:22 PM
lietuviai's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: SW WA
Posts: 5,744
Detroit Diesel's new engines in large trucks actually run cleaner than gasoline powered engines. In fact they were designed with CA stricter emission laws in mind. Their newest engine is actually a Mercedes engine.
I've seen one run on an engine stand and you can still carry a conversation next to it with it running at full throttle.
__________________
DJ


84 300D Turbodiesel 190K with 4 speed manual sold in 03/2012
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:50 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
I'm actually surprised given how "green" CA is that they don't already smog-test light-duty diesels. In many other states including mine all light-duty diesels (below 8000 lbs I think) between 2 and 40 years old have to undergo an annual exhaust opacity test. It's really not a big deal and it's very easy to pass, but it costs almost $40 which is more than the typical gas smog check.

I wouldn't worry about having to modify or abandon your light-duty diesel. Just keep on driving and worry about something real.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:50 PM
pawoSD's Avatar
Dieselsüchtiger
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI
Posts: 15,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by lietuviai View Post
Detroit Diesel's new engines in large trucks actually run cleaner than gasoline powered engines. In fact they were designed with CA stricter emission laws in mind. Their newest engine is actually a Mercedes engine.
I've seen one run on an engine stand and you can still carry a conversation next to it with it running at full throttle.
Wow! That's pretty awesome stuff. Diesels have come a reeeal long way, for sure.

CA probably considers H2 Hummers and Escalades cleaner than Golf Tdi's....right? Those screwed up laws are part of the bigger problem with US fuel consumption. A vehicle that uses 5x as much fuel is in no way cleaner than one using such a small amount.
__________________
-diesel is not just a fuel, its a way of life-
'15 GLK250 Bluetec 118k - mine - (OC-123,800)
'17 Metris(VITO!) - 37k - wifes (OC-41k)
'09 Sprinter 3500 Winnebago View - 62k (OC - 67k)
'13 ML350 Bluetec - 95k - dad's (OC-98k)
'01 SL500 - 103k(km) - dad's (OC-110,000km)
'16 E400 4matic Sedan - 148k - Brothers (OC-155k)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-16-2009, 01:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Reno/Sparks, NV
Posts: 3,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by pawoSD View Post
Wow! That's pretty awesome stuff. Diesels have come a reeeal long way, for sure.

CA probably considers H2 Hummers and Escalades cleaner than Golf Tdi's....right? Those screwed up laws are part of the bigger problem with US fuel consumption. A vehicle that uses 5x as much fuel is in no way cleaner than one using such a small amount.
That's starting to change now that CO2 is considered a pollutant and fuel economy standards are on the rise. I don't think the Hummer has a very bright future to say the least.

The new TDI's are now 50-state legal again and very clean in all aspects. The older ones had some trouble at times meeting CA's strict NOx emissions.
__________________
2004 VW Jetta TDI (manual)

Past MB's: '96 E300D, '83 240D, '82 300D, '87 300D, '87 420SEL
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-17-2009, 01:35 AM
compress ignite's Avatar
Drone aspiring to Serfdom
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: 32(degrees) North by 81(degrees) West
Posts: 5,554
I.C. Pollution Sources in decending order

Aircraft
Unregulated internal combustion engines
Everything else
Regulated combustion engines.

Way,Way down the list...Diesel/Electric Locomotives.

"Carriage Trade" will soon have a new meaning(Understanding) in California.

__________________
'84 300SD sold
124.128
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page