Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-31-2010, 12:40 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 112
Compression results: 320 - 220 psi, is it terminal?

Hi all, can you give me an assessment of these compression numbers?

1 - 300
2 - 290
3 - 310
4 - 320
5 - 220

Check done on a 1983 300SD with 350k, cold (70F) engine, US General tester via injector. Valve clearances all checked & adjusted before. Fully charged battery with assist from charger.

I ran the check twice after I saw #5. First time I went 1->5, then charged the battery for another 3 hrs, and ran it again 5->1.

I added oil to #5, but couldn't get it to read above 220 no matter what. Pulled the valve cover and re-checked clearances, no dice. Couldn't spot any leaks, either.

Car runs well, but mileage has dropped since the last valve adjustment (~10-15k ago). Smoke has gotten worse.

All injectors tested good (Metro Diesel in Santa Fe using Diesel Kiki tester), so I think the smoke is coming from #5's low compression.

So here's the question.. is it likely repairable, and if not, think it would run another 50k miles?

__________________
'82 300SD 351k
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-31-2010, 02:47 AM
layback40's Avatar
Not Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Victoria Australia - down under!!
Posts: 4,023
#5 is a worry.
Is there much blow by?
It could be stuck rings.
Has the car been run on WVO?
What was the reading on #5 before the oil was added?
Is the car idling roughly?
The test should have been done on a warm motor.
Does it use much oil?
__________________
Grumpy Old Diesel Owners Club group

I no longer question authority, I annoy authority. More effect, less effort....

1967 230-6 auto parts car. rust bucket.
1980 300D now parts car 800k miles
1984 300D 500k miles
1987 250td 160k miles English import
2001 jeep turbo diesel 130k miles
1998 jeep tdi ~ followed me home. Needs a turbo.
1968 Ford F750 truck. 6-354 diesel conversion.
Other toys ~J.D.,Cat & GM ~ mainly earth moving

Last edited by layback40; 10-31-2010 at 06:47 AM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-31-2010, 06:02 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
The change in mileage since adjusting the valves points to a mistake in the #5 valves. I would recheck that first.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10-31-2010, 10:13 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blue Point, NY
Posts: 25,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by t walgamuth View Post
The change in mileage since adjusting the valves points to a mistake in the #5 valves. I would recheck that first.
X2

Unfortunately, if the exhaust valve was set to intake specs, it's likely to have hung open at certain operating points and has burned.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10-31-2010, 11:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 112
Oil consumption is low.

Adding oil to #5 made almost no difference (200 psi vs 220 psi).

Car has never seen WVO.

Blowby could be better, but I've seen much worse.

I should restate myself - The mileage decrease wasn't immediately after the valve adjustment (May - 10k ago). It ran fine then started smoking more in the last 2-3 months. I'm pretty sure I adjusted the valves right.. I've done it about a dozen times over the last 10 yrs. One thing I noticed is that #5 always needed adjustment.
I was thinking burned valve seat, since #5 had about .2mm clearance on the exhaust valve when I adjusted it before the compression check.
__________________
'82 300SD 351k
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10-31-2010, 12:17 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
Yep.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10-31-2010, 01:46 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 112
I'm thinking about buying a rebuilt head.
What are the chances of me pulling the head and finding the bottom end is toast or something else terminal? Does the information so far point pretty solidly at the valve seat?
__________________
'82 300SD 351k
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10-31-2010, 02:02 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 295
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcneil View Post
Hi all, can you give me an assessment of these compression numbers?

1 - 300
2 - 290
3 - 310
4 - 320
5 - 220

Check done on a 1983 300SD with 350k, cold (70F) engine, US General tester via injector. Valve clearances all checked & adjusted before. Fully charged battery with assist from charger.

I ran the check twice after I saw #5. First time I went 1->5, then charged the battery for another 3 hrs, and ran it again 5->1.

I added oil to #5, but couldn't get it to read above 220 no matter what. Pulled the valve cover and re-checked clearances, no dice. Couldn't spot any leaks, either.

Car runs well, but mileage has dropped since the last valve adjustment (~10-15k ago). Smoke has gotten worse.

All injectors tested good (Metro Diesel in Santa Fe using Diesel Kiki tester), so I think the smoke is coming from #5's low compression.

So here's the question.. is it likely repairable, and if not, think it would run another 50k miles?
Hi
Seems to me a leak down test might be in order.
Joseph
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10-31-2010, 02:09 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkubica View Post
Hi
Seems to me a leak down test might be in order.
Joseph
Why?

Once you have excluded the obvious three like leaking injector seal, leaking glowplug seal, and too tight tappets....

NO MATTER WHAT THE PROBLEM IS, the head has to come off to do any kind of remedial work.

Once the head is off, even if you discover the problem is stuck / cracked rings and the head is perfect, you have lost PRECISELY NOTHING. In either time or money.

What is it with this forum that people keep suggesting successive tests, all looking for a specific result that gives a cheap / fast / easy cure?

The guy already did a cold dry and cold wet (add oil) test, it made bugger all difference so as much as it is possible to know, he doesn't have a ring problem.

Take the bloody head off and let the dog see the rabbit.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10-31-2010, 02:49 PM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
Have you ever pulled a head on a mercedes diesel motor?
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 10-31-2010, 03:20 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 295
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by W124 E300D View Post
Why?

Once you have excluded the obvious three like leaking injector seal, leaking glowplug seal, and too tight tappets....

NO MATTER WHAT THE PROBLEM IS, the head has to come off to do any kind of remedial work.

Once the head is off, even if you discover the problem is stuck / cracked rings and the head is perfect, you have lost PRECISELY NOTHING. In either time or money.

What is it with this forum that people keep suggesting successive tests, all looking for a specific result that gives a cheap / fast / easy cure?

The guy already did a cold dry and cold wet (add oil) test, it made bugger all difference so as much as it is possible to know, he doesn't have a ring problem.

Take the bloody head off and let the dog see the rabbit.
Hi
Well, to each his own I guess. A leak down test is easy, fast & cheap. A broken piston/ring or even a scored cylinder wall might well mean the engine isn't worth repairing. On the other hand, leaking valves or failed head gasket might mean the expense wont be that great.

Being on the lazy side myself, I wouldn't pull a diesel head just for the fun of a look see.

Cheers,
Joseph
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-31-2010, 03:38 PM
mach0415's Avatar
Diesel Weasel
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Lawndale, NC
Posts: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkubica View Post
Hi
Seems to me a leak down test might be in order.
Joseph

x2 leak down test first
__________________
Thanks,
Mark in NC

"Spark plugs?...We don't need no stinking spark plugs!"
1985 300SD "Der Silberne Schlitten" 420,000 mi


Wish these were diesel:
2003 Ford Club Wagon 130,000 mi
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-31-2010, 03:38 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: UK
Posts: 331
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkubica View Post
A broken piston/ring or even a scored cylinder wall might well mean the engine isn't worth repairing.

And that, folks, is everything that is wrong with this world.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-31-2010, 04:47 PM
Alastair's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: South Wales U.K.
Posts: 1,064
The addition of oil down nos. 5 pot did not much increase the reading.

This points to Valve/s leaking....

Pull the head, re-guide and re-valve, re-cut seats and lap in new valves, fit new valve seals.
Check closely valve-springs and compare to FSM spec, or replace.

Replace the Lock-Nuts on valve-stems, as the high milage will probably mean that these have worn down below min thickness.....

Nice easy weekend job....
__________________
http://i190.photobucket.com/albums/z...0TDnoplate.jpg

Alastair AKA H.C.II South Wales, U.K. based member

W123, 1985 300TD Wagon, 256K,
-Most recent M.B. purchase, Cost-a-plenty, Gulps BioDiesel extravagantly, and I love it like an old dog.

W114, 1975 280E Custard Yellow,
-Great above decks needs chassis welding--Really will do it this year....
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-31-2010, 06:36 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Pasadena, CA
Posts: 112
Lacking a real leakdown tester, I rigged up a 20 psi regulated source to the compression test fitting (See picture, sorry about the quality)



It's pressurizing the crankcase.. If I hold my hand over the crank breather, I can feel the pressure. If I hold it over the compressor inlet, nothing. Sounds like it's blowing into the crank, can't hear anything in the exhaust.

Hole in the piston?

__________________
'82 300SD 351k
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page