Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-30-2011, 12:51 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
190d with 3.0 6 cyl?

wrecked my sdl so im looking for a blown up sdl or d and im wondering if my motor n tranny would fit in a 190d? sdl is my favorite but i wouldnt mind dropping a couple hundred pounds


...not trying to do anything crazy tho lol

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-30-2011, 01:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 2,423
Theres a few vids on youtube.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-30-2011, 01:35 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 1,253
The 190 I bought to put my 2.2 diesel into had a 2.6 - 6 cyl gas motor. There was not a lot of room between the fan and the radiator, but I think it would work. Other's have done it.

A 1993 190E 2.6 has a curb weight of 3040 lbs. and a 2.85 axle. 158 hp / 162 ft lbs torque
A 1987 300SDL has a curb weight of 3835 lbs. and a 2.88 axle. 148 hp / 201 ft lbs torque

Do the math and wipe that silly grin off your face.

If you are going to do this, find a 190 with a manual trans. and put the diesel in front of the manual trans.
__________________
Greg
2012 S350 BlueTEC 4Matic
2007 ML 320 CDI
2007 Leisure Travel Serenity
2006 Sprinter 432k
2005 E320 CDI
1998 SLK230 (teal)
1998 SLK230 (silver)
1996 E300D 99k, 30k on WVO
Previous:
1983 240D, on WVO
1982 300D, on WVO
1983 300CD, on WVO
1986 300SDL 237k, 25k on WVO (Deerslayer)
1991 350SDL 249k, 56k on WVO - Retired to a car spa in Phoenix
1983 380 SEC w/603 diesel, 8k on WVO
1996 E300D 351k, 177k on WVO
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-30-2011, 01:52 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: coquitlam bc canada
Posts: 427
190e 2.6 would be a better fit

The 190d NA has a welded in front rad support, same as the 190e 4cyl gasser. The 190e 2.6 has a bolted in rad support same as the 190DT. It would be easier to get everything in and working if you can take the rad support out to install the engine. Also the rads mount different one to the rear of the rad support the other underneath. 190 2.6s are a dime a dozen so you could get a cherry body to start with. Cheers Dan
__________________
It's always something simple
91 300D 603.960 (from japan) 194K
92 Toyota Diesel Landcruiser HDJ81-t 116K
02 Golf TDI new head courtesy of PO
87 300D
97 BMW 525 TDS Wagon 5spd
bunch of Onan and other diesel generators
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-30-2011, 06:45 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
greg idk wut math ur talkin about im looking to gain some mpg i was hovering around 30 mpg hwy driving stricly 65 with the sdl im sure it would go up in a lighter car
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-30-2011, 07:46 PM
aaa aaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,075
I think he meant performance.

Lighter would only improve city mileage. If you want 35mpg then you need a smaller engine. Like a 2.2.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-30-2011, 10:03 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
2.2 gives me dead leg to drive i need a turbo

go run around with 100 pound backpack city hwy wherever ull burn more energy than naked dont tell me lighter would only improve city mileage

or go drive around with 800 pounds of poop in ur car n then u can believe it doesnt hurt ur mpg
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-30-2011, 10:07 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
my dad has a 190 2.5 turbo i like it and it just made me wonder i think well just wait for a clean blown 300


the capital of djibouti is djibouti!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-30-2011, 10:10 PM
aaa aaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,075
Look up the mpg numbers of the w124 3L turbo, w124 2.5L turbo, w201 2.5L turbo. The 3L doesn't do as well mpg wise for the same weight car, whereas smaller engine equals more mpg.

Oh, there's a 190d that comes with a 2.5L turbo stock btw. Might be peppy enough for ya.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-30-2011, 10:19 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
300sdl the mpg website claims 18 n 22 i got 28.somethin from pa to vermont rarely goin over 65

if i take the motor(came outta 300d) out of my w126 300sdl n put it with the slighty different tranny(different gearing n speedo cable or something) of a 300d im sure ill get better mpg
or if it would work in an even smaller 190 id get evennn better mpg

thanks 4 ur input tho
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-31-2011, 05:05 AM
aaa aaa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1,075
I meant do a search and see what forum members say they're getting. For example, this neat thread on 190D mpg. Interesting to see how automatic vs manual makes a big difference...

You could also compare what members are saying about 300SDL vs 300D mileage. I didn't actually look this time but my hunch is they're the same, the weight difference isn't very big (only the 190 is significantly lighter). They do use the exact same gearing btw.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-31-2011, 06:00 AM
t walgamuth's Avatar
dieselarchitect
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lafayette Indiana
Posts: 38,626
Highway mileage is all about air resistance and gearing. I have an 83 123 bodied car running a euro 617 NA but with a 307 diff and a manual five speed OD tranny. I get 35 running 75 mpg with it.

My body is getting shaggy now and I am daydreaming about a 190 body with the same drivetrain. I would then run a 265 diff and I bet I would get 45 mpg with no trouble.

The larger motor would be offset by taller gearing.

Of course you could get better mileage with a 2.2 motor, the 265 diff and a stick od tranny but I am not sure the little 2.2 would pull that tall a gear.
__________________
[SIGPIC] Diesel loving autocrossing grandpa Architect. 08 Dodge 3/4 ton with Cummins & six speed; I have had about 35 benzes. I have a 39 Studebaker Coupe Express pickup in which I have had installed a 617 turbo and a five speed manual.[SIGPIC]

..I also have a 427 Cobra replica with an aluminum chassis.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-31-2011, 04:06 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
straight up idk wut u guys r talkin about with gearing my dads my mechanic i help him with wut i can like workin the motor hoist i ride 4 wheelers so i understand gearing with changing the wheels/tires n sprockets but 2.88 n stuff is beyond me

the way i feel is if i take my motor out of the heavier car n put it in the lighter car it should be less work for my motor but enough about mpg


i know theres a bunch of different 190s so does anyone know which one if any my motor and tranny will drop right into? me and my dad are diesel benz enthusiasts not monster garage lol

i wouldnt trust a tranny out of a 190d non turbo because my motor has a lot more torque n im in it for the long run


its a recession im just lookin for a cheap broken benz to fix with my wrecked sdl(front left wheel got ripped back ball joint broke right off)
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-31-2011, 04:40 PM
ashedd's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,790
You might want to spell out what your trying to say. No one here is going to take you seriously if you continue to type in that text/Facebook language.

I would find a 2.5 190d and be happy. Swapping a diesel engine(om60x) into a gas body is easier said than done. Just about any engine would get better mpg's with a manual transmission vs. an automatic. Find a om603/om602 w124/w201 and put a manual in it.
__________________
08 R320 CDI current

Past
95 E420
87 300D Turbo 5spd
90 300TE
83 300SD
85 300TD
92 400E
85 190D

Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-31-2011, 07:43 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 37
id rather not cook a weak tranny not built for a turbo diesel

thnx 4 useless info asheed

do u guys come here to/for help or for an argument behind ur keyboard?

lol


smh


theres a 190d 2.5 turbo in my driveway but my dad isnt willing to part with it srry u cant read old timer

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page