|
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Very indecisive about Daily Driver Merc purchase
I want to start by saying how much fun I've had surfing around this forum. I've learned a lot but realize that I have a ton more to learn about these very cool cars.
As the subject line suggests, I am thinking about buying an older diesel Mercedes to use as a daily driver. After reading through the forums I have really become infected with the love and admiration these cars seem to invoke in their owners. But at the same time I'm a bit leery because as a technical forum, there are a lot of problems posted here. I'm not the most mechanically inclined person out there but would love to learn and think that these cars might be a fun way of doing that. I have recently come across a couple of very nice examples that have caught my eye. One of them is a 1976 W114 or 115 in really nice shape and the other is an absolutely mint 1979 W123 300D. Both appear to be rust free. I'm planning on taking them for test drives next weekend, but in the mean time would like some guidance as to which might be better and why. Would the 114/115 be better because it might be a more simple design and therefore easier to work on? Or would it be better to go with a newer model. Neither of them has a turbo, do you think that would be a turn off to someone whose only driven modern cars? Will I be taking my life into my hands trying to merge into traffic going 75mph with either of them? Do they even go that fast!? Are these good cars for hauling my two month old daughter in? Do they suck in snowy conditions? So many questions! As I said, I have a lot to learn but always enjoy doing so. Thanks in advance for the knowledge and advice. Aaron |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
I wouldn't recommend one that old as a daily driver. There's just too many age related issues at that point, unless its been pretty much completely gone though. Its not the drivetrain I'm worried about, but all the rubber and sealing components. The 79 300D also has the AC2 system, which is not a pleasant auto climate control system. If its not working, best just walk away or plan on a long road ahead. You're also not going to be satisfied if your expectations are modern terms in acceleration.
I started with an '85 300D, and as much as I enjoyed it I now realize how primitive it was. I initially bought into the whole durability aura surrounding these cars, but now after having 20+ of them I've finally realized that they're very fragile machines that age well, but are 20-30 years old. For the same or less money you can get a Buick with the 3.8 or a Crown Vic/Grand Marquis that's 15 years newer with far less miles and it will be a far more reliable car. If you want one of these do it for the right reason. Don't think you can daily drive one and do a few little side repairs every once in a while. Most of us have multiples for the dual purpose of liking them, and to drive when the other one breaks.
__________________
1985 500SL Euro w/ AMG bits 130k 1984 300SD Turbodiesel 192k 1980 240D Stick China 188k 2001 CLK55 AMG 101k 2007 S600 Biturbo 149k Overheated Project, IT'S ALIVE!!! |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Multiple cars is also fun.. but also more expensive. Two sets of tires, two insurances, two license plates. My train of thought is: I can keep my SDL and TDI in really nice shape for about / less then the cost of a new car payment. Then I'm left with two nice cars instead of one
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states! Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels. 2014 Cadillac ELR 2013 Fiat 500E. |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I'd think a 300D would keep up with traffic, though the climate control on those is troublesome. -J
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states! Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels. 2014 Cadillac ELR 2013 Fiat 500E. |
#5
|
||||
|
||||
This is just my opinion based on my experience with my Own Mercedes; and that without having another Vehicle to drive when the Mercedes needs work it will be very difficult to live with your Mercedes when it comes time to Fix it.
Take a look at some jobs listed in the threads below like changing the Oil Cooler Hoses, Rear Axles, Rear Wheel Bearings, Lower Control Arm Bushings, Motor and Transmission Mounts, the various Transmission issues, Valve Adjustment, Changing or adjusting the Front Wheel Bearings, replacing the Timing Chain, and changing a Ball Joint. Some of the above jobs are easier than others; but, imagine having to pay someone else to do those jobs; or, if you did the jobs Yourself how much time it would take to round up Tools and Parts. DIY Repair Links http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/forumdisplay.php?f=82 http://www.peachparts.com/Wikka/DoItYourSelf Do some reading and decide for yourself.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Drive one first. None of the W123 diesels are fast, and the W114 is going to make the 300D look sprightly. That's not to say they're dangerous or undriveable, but you need to know what you're getting yourself into.
Also, if it's in your budget and you can find a nice example, consider a W124 diesel. My E300D has been completely bulletproof for 20,000 not-very-gentle miles, and it already had 238,000 on the clock by the time I got my hands on it. Much smoother ride than a W123 because of the multilink rear suspension, which is important in a DD car. Also somewhat nicer inside, AC is more likely to work, more comfort touches. The W123 is a durable car; the W124 was the first E class you could actually think of as a luxury car.
__________________
RIP: 2011 E350 BlueTEC, Schwartz 81k (totaled by uninsured drunk driver) 1964 Unimog 404.1 (wrongfully towed by the city) 1994 E320, Brilliantsilber 208k (transmission shuffled off after sudden catastrophic fluid loss) 1982 300D, Silberblau under a blue repaint 256k (sold for parts) 1995 E320 Polarweiss, 131k (sold for parts) 1995 E300D Polarweiss, 287k (totaled by drunk driver) |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
read this thread: http://www.peachparts.com/shopforum/showthread.php?t=302495
i've always lusted after a 115 but only for a toy. if you want a daily get a 124. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Hi welcome to the forum. looks like you have been doing some studying before deciding to jump over the fence and get your feet wet. you know once you get one, they are addictive.
The 79 W123 will be a 300D 5 cylinder engine, with 80hp or so. It should get you moving into the traffic ok. at the higher elevations not being a turbo, it will be a little slower. The 76 W115 could be a 240D or a 300D, they had both that year. the 240 is 60 hp or so, and the 300 probably the same as the 123 above. with the 240 you will have to plan you move some what and drive a little more defensive. You are right, there are a lot of problems posted as you read through the forum threads. usually in the fall it is starting issues and heat, and in the spring it is air conditioning issues. there are a lot of new diesel first time owners that have various concerns learning the various noises these engines make. You will be buying an old 30 yr old car +-. and there will be issues and po neglect and abuses you acquired in your purchase. I have an 80 240D with 323K, and we have made 3 trips to Portland, Or and 4 to Carson City, Nv, and one to los Angeles in the past year. tuesday we will be going back to Portland, 730 miles. the 80 has 67hp and can hold it`s own on the road, also has a 4-spd transmission. it get 33+mpg on the highway. If you do buy a 240, an automatic will be doggy slow. the 79 123 will be an automatic. they did not come with a manual transmission. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_W123 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercedes-Benz_W114 Charlie
__________________
there were three HP ratings on the OM616... 1) Not much power 2) Even less power 3) Not nearly enough power!! 240D w/auto Anyone that thinks a 240D is slow drives too fast. 80 240D Naturally Exasperated, 4-Spd 388k DD 150mph spedo 3:58 Diff We are advised to NOT judge ALL Muslims by the actions of a few lunatics, but we are encouraged to judge ALL gun owners by the actions of a few lunatics. Funny how that works |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
I daily drive an 85 300D, I love my car, but the small repairs will break your spirit eventually, and you will left with a car that you can't sell for nearly the amount you have invested in it to get it reliable. Buy a newer car if you want a daily driver, I plan to get one as soon as I can afford it.
I have invested about 3000 dollars into my w123, and the paint is awful after one AZ summer, I've considered repainting it, but do I really want to drop 1000 more dollars for a okay at best paint job on a car that will get totaled for the slightest accident.... See what I mean about breaking your spirit. For a weekend or a restore project, they are great, for a daily car... They make me sad sometimes. |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Answer
Quote:
Then try to find an 1981 - 1985 (all are TURBO) 300D and 300SD to test drive.. Then make your decision.. .
__________________
ASE Master Mechanic asemastermechanic@juno.com Prototype R&D/testing: Thermal & Aerodynamic System Engineering (TASE) Senior vehicle instrumentation technician. Noise Vibration and Harshness (NVH). Dynamometer. Heat exchanger durability. HV-A/C Climate Control. Vehicle build. Fleet Durability Technical Quality Auditor. Automotive Technical Writer 1985 300SD 1983 300D 1984 190D 2003 Volvo V70 2002 Honda Civic https://www.boldegoist.com/ |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Aren't US spec '81 300Ds and CDs normally aspirated?
Sixto 87 300D |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Answer
Quote:
1978-1980 W116.120 300SD OM617.950 1981-1985 W126.120 300SD OM617.952 1981 MB offered the 300D, 300CD, and 300TD both ways. The 240D was already scheduled to end production in 1984 = no resources wasted re-designing for a turbo. Sales where so bad in 1981 on the naturally aspirated diesel cars that most dealers would NOT stock them, except as a demo showing customers the OM617.952 turbo power. It is difficult, by comparison to find a 1981 NA 300D 1982 + the USA diesel was OM617.952 = turbo only. |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
I love my '82 as a daily driver! It is predictable in bad weather.
Yes, they do require maintenance, and at times seems like lots of it. My car has 290,000 on it now. I have had it for five years now, and I will not part with it. Next weekend I get to replace the flex disks, center support bushing and bearing. My car also needs painting. But, it is solid and reliable. Since it is mainly mechanical, it needs reliable maintenance to stay reliable as a driveable car. I am an IT guy. I love this car for no computer or ECM. No CEL and codes to read. The only idiot lights it has is for charging, brakes, and brake pad wear on the front. The glowplug light is not an idiot light. I do want a w126, but funding keeps it from me.
__________________
RRGrassi 70's Southern Pacific #5608 Fairmont A-4 MOW car 13 VW JSW 2.0 TDI 193K, Tuned with DPF and EGR Delete. 99 W210 E300 TD Turbo, chipped. Still needs EGR Delete, 228K 90 Dodge D250 5.9 Cummins/5 speed. 400K |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
I bought an 83 300SD as a daily driver, so far it has been great. I have rebuilt the whole front suspension already though, and fixed a few other things. I think it is pretty easy to work on, and it keeps up with traffic just fine. The previous cars I have driven daily were a 1985 shelby charger and a 1987 alfa romeo milano, so the mercedes seems pretty simple and reliable compared to those.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
You can have an old (>15 years old) car as a daily, but you must have a backup. My '71 250 was a daily for a while, as is my 300D, but I've always had backup rides so I can get to work when one is down. I'm currently loving my '06 Kawasaki as my daily, but it isn't so good for hauling a load of groceries.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. |
Bookmarks |
|
|