|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Newbie seeks sagely wisdom
I've posted a similar question on two other MB forums but this group here seems more on my wavelength.
I've owned a lot of cars, mostly junk. All maintained by me. Finally I can afford something that's not junk. I find myself in a 2006 Civic hybrid. Wonderful car but it's so boring. Thinking about selling it and getting into something that makes me smile the way my 84 Saab 900 did. criteria: - great MPG - price $2-4K - either good resale or a very good deal (or both) - highly reliable - (additional maintenance is OK) So far I'm leaning toward the 190D, and W124's from around 90-95. I could go as far back as the 70's but I don't think I'll get the MPG i'm looking for. I drive 25-30k miles per year. Pretty sure the 240D would be too slow. My current car is about as slow as i can tolerate (0-60 in 13 sec) This would be a daily driver, i have no interest in restoring a classic. I'd like to find one with a few blemishes and I would regularly add a few more. I hope this question provokes some good discussion Dave |
#2
|
||||
|
||||
Find you a nice diesel W124. 190D too small, W123 too primitive.
__________________
Jimmy L. '05 Acura TL 6MT 2001 ML430 My Spare Gone: '95 E300 188K "Batmobile" Texas Unfriendly Black '85 300TD 235K "The Wagon" Texas Friendly White '80 240D 154K "China" Scar engine installed '81 300TD 240K "Smash" '80 240D 230K "The Squash" '81 240D 293K"Scar" Rear ended harder than Elton John |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
yeah, maybe one of the w124 2.5 turbo cars...
__________________
Current Diesels: 1981 240D (73K) 1982 300CD (169k) 1985 190D (169k) 1991 350SD (113k) 1991 350SD (206k) 1991 300D (228k) 1993 300SD (291k) 1993 300D 2.5T (338k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (442k) 1996 Dodge Ram CTD (265k) Past Diesels: 1983 300D (228K) 1985 300D (233K) |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
I have a W124 diesel, and it it a great car. But I would not own it if it was my only car. That Honda you have may be boring, but it is probably more dependable that the W124 will ever be.
That said, there are plenty of the W124's on the market. The 87 like mine is the fastest, but also the most problematic. Still a great car. Good luck on your Mercedes adventure. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
What makes the 87 the most problematic? From what I've read, all the W124's are quick enough for my taste. I'm kinda drawn to the 95 E300D Which years came with the 90 liter tank? thanks |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Mercedes-Benz W211 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Mercedes-Benz E-Class W211 2002 - Car Review | Honest John The OM648 engine will probably make you feel like you are in a comfortable version of your Saab 900. Highly reliable - well that comes down to luck / getting a good buy. You'd probably have to pay more than 4K for a good one though. I've seen high mileage ones go for as little as 1500 euros over here.
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
With all due respect to those who disagree, I think a 90-93 300D (W124) fits what the OP is looking for. My two have been extremely reliable....although obviously there's lots of stuff to replace over the years. You can certainly find one in the price range you have in mind and you'd get a solid 30 mpg highway. If I only had one car, I wouldn't hesitate to have it be one of these....PROVIDED that it was well maintained.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
And the 95 E300D is certainly a great car...just watch out for that biodegradable wiring harness!
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
About that, was it just the 95 (of the W124s)? What are the other advantages to the 95 versus previous years? And is it just the engine harness? What about the rest of the cars wiring? I'm actually hoping to find a decent 95 that has wiring problems. Nothing scares the price down better than electrical problems and they don't intimidate me as long as i can find a schematic. thanks Dave |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Haven't owned a 95, so don't know about the particulars....just know the general issue is a matter of concern. But I think your strategy to beat down the price is a good one.
I don't know that the 95 offers any particular advantage. Different engine of course....non-aspirated 606 vs. turbo 602. The 95 is 0.2 sec quicker 0-60....negligible. I would gladly owner either one. Quote:
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Best bet is to find one with just over 200k miles....that will help you beat down the price a bit.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 153k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 171k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
124 or 201 should be fine, though a non-turbo 190D might be too slow for the OP. The best way to find out is to drive one. Other possibilities include a turbo 123, or a 210 if he can find one within his budget.
__________________
Whoever said there's nothing more expensive than a cheap Mercedes never had a cheap Jaguar. 83 300D Turbo with manual conversion, early W126 vented front rotors and H4 headlights 400,xxx miles 08 Suzuki GSX-R600 M4 Slip-on 22,xxx miles 88 Jaguar XJS V12 94,xxx miles. Work in progress. |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Only the '95 E300 and 92-95 500E/E500 have 90 liter tanks. I don't know if gas and Diesel use the same tank. The larger tank can be retrofitted to any 124 sedan. It's up to you to swap over the trunk liner parts or trim/hack the existing liner parts.
A 2.5 or E300 has to be in tiptop shape to do 0-60 in 13 seconds considering they're closing on or at 20 years on the road. I don't know the context of David Wilson's problematic characterization. I wouldn't say the '87 is the more or less problematic than other W124 Diesels. The potential for the early head casting to crack is well documented but you'll be bucks ahead to get into a well maintained '87 than a neglected '90-93 or '95. You break a glow plug in a '95 and the head likely has to come off to be fixed. Do you plan to service the car yourself? They can be expensive to maintain otherwise. Sixto 87 300D^2 |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
Good to know about the tank- swap option. I definitely plan to work on the car myself but I don't want that to become my new hobby thanks Dave |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|