|
|
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
No but it should tell you how much the fluid will expand
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
Answer
Quote:
There is significant thermal contraction at lower temperatures. Checking cold ATF is NOT recommended, due in part to extreme thermal expansion-contraction. On most transmissions the thermal expansion-contraction is a critical variable due to unique individual unit age/wear factors.. The only ATF level that is relevant is the operating temperature reading. If there are NO transmission leaks, and the level is correct at operating temperature = the fluid level will remain acceptable (within operating range) for a ridiculous number of miles. . |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
The FSM certainly thinks that measuring cold is fine. It specifies measuring at 20-30C as a legitimate method for measuring the level, giving very exact levels at that temperature for different 722 transmissions, thereby taking account of the thermal contraction. If they recommend it, how is it not recommended??
Quote:
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 154k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 172k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#19
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Nice links - there's also this one that is on Engineering toolbox too Coefficients of Cubical Expansion of Liquids I can't be bothered to do the sums today - I might come back and revisit this one though!
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
#20
|
||||
|
||||
I think the biggest difference in fluid level is when the pump + torque converter is running / working and when the pump etc isn't
__________________
1992 W201 190E 1.8 171,000 km - Daily driver 1981 W123 300D ~ 100,000 miles / 160,000 km - project car stripped to the bone 1965 Land Rover Series 2a Station Wagon CIS recovery therapy! 1961 Volvo PV544 Bare metal rat rod-ish thing I'm here to chat about cars and to help others - I'm not here "to always be right" like an internet warrior Don't leave that there - I'll take it to bits! |
#21
|
||||
|
||||
FWIW, when you check the ATF level on a 96+ VW, you actually use a scan tool to check the AFT temp first, there is a specific range where you are allowed to see if the transmission is full. But an IR thermometer on the pan gets very close.
It wouldn't be that hard to do something similar on our old cars... define a temp where the fluid should be checked and just measure the pan temp. -J
__________________
1991 350SDL. 230,000 miles (new motor @ 150,000). Blown head gasket Tesla Model 3. 205,000 miles. Been to 48 states! Past: A fleet of VW TDIs.... including a V10,a Dieselgate Passat, and 2 ECOdiesels. 2014 Cadillac ELR 2013 Fiat 500E. |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
I had seen this document and my car has a 722.4 trans - when I check it cold - engine running, lever shifted to all positions back to park - I measure the fluid to be exactly 12mm below the 30 mark.
When I come home after my drive from work (35 miles) - the gauge usually shows 90 or 95 - sometimes 100 (Tx heat) and I check - the gauge shows overfilled. I cant figure out if the thing is low or overfilled. I just assumed that MB wrote that manual and it must be correct. - Trans shifts nicely though, cept that I cant seem to get 5400 rpm shifts from it.
__________________
2012 BMW X5 (Beef + Granite suspension model) 1995 E300D - The original humming machine (consumed by Flood 2017) 2000 E320 - The evolution (consumed by flood 2017) |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
That said, hot and cold measurements on my 722.3 never seem to coincide with the FSM specifications. |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
I should have said most. I was not aware of the FSM cold procedure when I posted that & would of course defer to the FSM absent some obvious reason to do otherwise.
__________________
Remember, Safety Third! '99 E300 Turbodiesel, '82 300TD, 1996 12V Cummins Turbo, '94 Neoplan - Detroit 6V92TA |
#25
|
||||
|
||||
Answer
Quote:
After 100K+ miles, and the typical mauling many of these vehicles have been through. * Transmission wear factors stack up. * Transmission thermal load rises. * Radiator/heat exchanger internal efficiency falls. * Engine wear factors stack up. * Engine thermal load rises. * Hydrostatic fan clutch efficiency begins to fall. * Radiator/condenser have (unique to every vehicle) "blank percent" external debris under the AUX cooling fan and caught in the vanes/fins effecting heat exchanger efficiency. * Alterations/superseded parts will impact thermal load. Example: Superior shift kit. I can NOT trust any used car to be perfect. . |
#26
|
|||
|
|||
I will also say that I have compared known hot and cold measurements on my cars. That is, in a case where I'm quite confident the tranny is at op temp and reads at the top mark, when I check it the next day cold it reads just where it should read cold.
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 154k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 172k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#27
|
||||
|
||||
OK
Quote:
Have a great day. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
__________________
14 E250 Bluetec 4Matic "Sinclair", Palladium Silver on Black, 154k miles 06 E320 CDI "Rutherford", Black on Tan, 172k mi, Stage 1 tune, tuned TCU 91 300D "Otis", Smoke Silver, 142k mi, wastegate conversion 19 Honda CR-V EX 61k mi Fourteen other MB's owned and sold 1961 Very Tolerant Wife |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Apart from the level on the dipstick, there is also the prescribed amount of transmission oil. Together with a cold check of the dipstick, that will be sufficient, so no dire warning is necessary.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|