Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:40 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 104
Tank Screen

My 85 300D has had a loping idle since I purchased it in October. Not bad of a lope when started, but rocks badly after a 10 minute freeway run. Last week I actually lost power while trying to accelerate from 55 to 65. The fact that it went from a lope to a fuel starvation issue was key as this finally gave me an excuse to purge the tank. This car has been a Florida car most of its life; has 158,000 miles and is rust free. Check out the tank screen.
Gonna pick up a new one in the pm. Also will be resealing the lift pump. Will give a results report later this week when all back together.

Ended up removing the tank for a power washing and shopvac/mityvac drying out; looks good as new.

Attached Thumbnails
Tank Screen-300d-tank-screen.jpg  
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2013, 09:57 PM
ichris93's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Tampa Florida
Posts: 517
That is NASTY!!!!

Someone else from Tampa with a w123!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2013, 10:08 PM
mach4's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: San Diego County, CA
Posts: 2,736
Those will clean up nicely if you want to reuse. Just make sure that nothing is torn after you get it cleaned up.

If you order a new one, make sure you get the right strainer for your application. Some vendors list a single part number for both gas and diesel. You wouldn't want to be running a gas mesh in a diesel, particularly with the results you just experienced.

__________________
Current Stable
  • 380SL (diesel)
  • Corvette C5
  • Manx
  • Baja Bug
  • F350 Powerstroke
  • Auburn Boattail Speedster replica
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2013, 10:20 PM
Treeman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Murchisons, Texas
Posts: 249
I just pulled and cleaned my tank. I thought my filter was nasty but man you win the prize. After I pulled my tank I poured 2 gallons of Cider Vinegar in sloshed it around a couple of three times every couple of hours then let it sit overnight. Poured out the Vinegar and let it dry hanging from a tree filler neck down. Poured about a half pint of Denatured Alcohol in sloshed it around coating the inside, replaced the hoses and bang I'm back in business. Tanks full no leaks, be careful with the fuel sender. I'm happy.
__________________
Collector of Fine Hose Clamps
'77 240D 'AVA' is in heaven now
'80 240D Kanarienvogel
'82 300TD 343k was my daily driver 'ADOLPH' In Surgery for a severe Deer Bite to the Nose
'88 560SL 102k 'White One'
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-31-2013, 06:38 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Tampa FL
Posts: 104
I was able to clean the filter to a very acceptable level. The issue is that the dealer here in town does not have the gasket in stock, but NAPA has the filter and gasket. So basically to save a few days, i'll just change them both. No way I want to risk not changing the gasket just to have to drain fuel again... Will likely add a gasket to my next parts order to keep as a spare.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-31-2013, 09:54 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: TX
Posts: 3,978
I had a similar problem with my E300D and after cleaning - its "WOW this engine can pull" I was using startron for a dozen of a dozen tankfulls (gros) and all the ick was nicely placed in the upside down bowl in the tank.
__________________
2012 BMW X5 (Beef + Granite suspension model)

1995 E300D - The original humming machine (consumed by Flood 2017)
2000 E320 - The evolution (consumed by flood 2017)
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:04 PM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,230
Some folks would not agree, but I like to just cut off the strainer part so whatever is in the tank will get caught by the primary filter. It is much easier to replace a primary filter than to drain the tank! I want to get whatever is in (or gets in) out of the tank, and not have to drain the tank more than once.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2013, 08:51 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,242
Quote:
Originally Posted by ROLLGUY View Post
Some folks would not agree, but I like to just cut off the strainer part so whatever is in the tank will get caught by the primary filter. It is much easier to replace a primary filter than to drain the tank! I want to get whatever is in (or gets in) out of the tank, and not have to drain the tank more than once.
I guess I am one who disagrees.

You are presuming that nothing is going to get stuck in the Tubing and Hoses between the Primary Filter and the Fuel Tank.

Of course that won't happen if your Fuel tank has no Rust that continues to flake off or you don't get a load of contaminated Fuel from some station.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-31-2013, 09:06 PM
jay_bob's Avatar
Control Freak
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 3,941
Sorry I disagree also for the reasons mentioned above. Just too many chances of a large contaminate particle getting stuck in the tubing between the tank and the in-line filter.
__________________
The OM 642/722.9 powered family
Still going strong
2014 ML350 Bluetec (wife's DD)
2013 E350 Bluetec (my DD)

both my kids cars went to junkyard in 2023
2008 ML320 CDI (Older son’s DD) fatal transmission failure, water soaked/fried rear SAM, numerous other issues, just too far gone to save (165k miles)
2008 E320 Bluetec (Younger son's DD) injector failed open and diluted oil with diesel, spun main bearings (240k miles)

1998 E300DT sold to TimFreeh
1987 300TD sold to vstech
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:13 PM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,230
No problem, I knew some would no agree. However, I am only basing my opinion on MY experience. I remember draining a tank, and the cause of the lack of fuel was a clogged tank strainer. I got as much of the black stuff out as I could, and cut off the strainer and put everything back together. Several primary filter changes later, the tank seemed to be nearly clean. I am sure I would have had to drain the tank and clean the screen again if I had not removed it the first time. My niece has the car now, and gets the primary replaced very seldom now. Again, it is just my experience, and I will do the same every time I drain a tank to clean a screen....Rich
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 01-01-2014, 02:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Oregon
Posts: 314
I too have no tank screen in my '79. When I bought it, the PO informed me that it had been removed by the original dealer in 1990 to alleviate a bio-contamination problem, so the car has been without it for over 20 years at this point. In addition, the car is equipped with a dealer installed 14.9 gallon second tank which is connected to the main fuel line through a simple tee, and it has no screen. So essentially there has been no tank screen in the car since it was new.

When I began using biodiesel a few years ago, I went through a period of frequent filter changes, and some pretty impressively clogged primaries, but never a clogged line. Now my tanks are completely free of gunk. While there is some risk in running without the screen, it is not a great risk. In my view, a fuel line blockage is no more work to remedy than that required to clear a plugged screen.
__________________
'79 240D
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-01-2014, 03:13 PM
ROLLGUY's Avatar
ROLLGUY
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 7,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Left Coast View Post
I too have no tank screen in my '79. When I bought it, the PO informed me that it had been removed by the original dealer in 1990 to alleviate a bio-contamination problem, so the car has been without it for over 20 years at this point. In addition, the car is equipped with a dealer installed 14.9 gallon second tank which is connected to the main fuel line through a simple tee, and it has no screen. So essentially there has been no tank screen in the car since it was new.

When I began using biodiesel a few years ago, I went through a period of frequent filter changes, and some pretty impressively clogged primaries, but never a clogged line. Now my tanks are completely free of gunk. While there is some risk in running without the screen, it is not a great risk. In my view, a fuel line blockage is no more work to remedy than that required to clear a plugged screen.
Thank you.

Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page