Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 05-11-2015, 07:50 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 370
Anyone upgraded tank to pump lines?

Hi all,

After reading up a bit around the under specced fuel lines between the fuel tank to fuel pump, has anyone changed their fuel lines to the correct (Bosch) spec rather than the smaller Mercedes OEM lines?

Just wondering what people have done as my fuel pump will be demanding more fuel over the next few years after a few mods and I want to get the supporting tweaks in place first on a stock system.

Thanks in advance!

__________________
UK spec Mercedes W210 E300 Turbodiesel wagon - OM606.962 with 722.6 transmission - rust free!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 05-11-2015, 08:15 AM
Diesel Preferred
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 2,788
M1tch,

Please share your Bosch information. I've read a thread or two about insufficient flow volume for the OM606, and I'm wondering if it applies to my NA version.
__________________
Respectfully,
/s/
M. Dillon
'87 124.193 (300TD) "White Whale", ~392k miles, 3.5l IP fitted
'95 124.131 (E300) "Sapphire", 380k miles
'73 Balboa 20 "Sanctification"
Charleston SC
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 05-11-2015, 12:59 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Maxbumpo View Post
M1tch,

Please share your Bosch information. I've read a thread or two about insufficient flow volume for the OM606, and I'm wondering if it applies to my NA version.
I read in on here:

OM606 fuel supply issues

Apparenty the lift pump on the engine (both turbo and non turbo) is very strong and its causing such a vacuum owing to the smaller insufficiently sized pipes to draw air out of the diesel.

I am thinking about upgrading the long run from the tank to the lift pump to a larger diameter - I was also looking at adding in an electric fuel pump at the tank end as well.
__________________
UK spec Mercedes W210 E300 Turbodiesel wagon - OM606.962 with 722.6 transmission - rust free!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-11-2015, 03:01 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 4,154
What fuel pressure do we need?

Other diesels (Dodge Ram Cummins) have had problems with the injection pump going out because of poor cooling caused by undersized fuel lines and lack of lubrication caused by ULSD.

Here is 1 perhaps over kill solution: FASS Titanium Series Diesel Fuel Pump | FASSRIDE.COM
__________________
85SD 240K & stopped counting painted, putting bac together. 84SD 180,000. sold to a neighbor and member here but I forget his handle. The 84 is much improved from when I had it. 85TD beginning to repair to DD status. Lots of stuff to do.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 05-11-2015, 03:11 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington, NC by the Atlantic ocean
Posts: 2,530
I have the Fass pump on my Dodge - problem solved. The stock Bosch pump is marginal at best. If I knew then what I know now, one of the first things I would have done on the Dodge is to install the Fass pump - not overkill in that application.

BTW - your explanation of the cause of failure on the Cummins is not quite right. The IP fails because they get insufficient fuel and therefore lack proper lubrication - IP cooling really isn't much of an issue according to the folks I spoke with at Fass. Anyhow, it's a GREAT fix and permanent. The installation is a bit of a chore but once done it's DONE.

The use of ULSD has little impact on IP life. I worked with early versions of that fuel and a combination of our testing and lubricity testing at the fuel manufacturers showed that there is still good lubricity in modern Diesel fuels. The longer hydrocarbon chains in Diesel (as compared to gasoline) maintain lubricity without regard to sulfur content. This is one of those urban myths that "everyone knows" but simply isn't accurate. I use on-road Diesel in the race truck when I could just as well pump cheaper non-road fuel into the 5 gallon jug that I fill from. The ULSD burns cleaner and I see no advantage to running dirtier fuel just because I can.

My initial thought is that our Mercedes' don't pass enough fuel to make use of the Fass but if interested you could call those folks - they were very helpful when I called.

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 05-11-2015, 03:15 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Iowa City, IA
Posts: 1,647
McMaster-Carr

This is approved for biodiesel. Something like this is what comes with Elsbett Wvo kits. It's a big improvement over the old metal LiNes or small plastic lines.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 05-11-2015, 03:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 370
I am in the UK so I will need to find a different supplier, our diesel is indeed low sulpher, however I am running some 2 stroke oil as premix with the diesel for added pump lubrication.

I am going to probably get an inline electric pump and a slightly larger diameter feed line from the tank. I don't think there are any intank pumps at all? I will look at some of the VWO kits as I know that the veg oil is thicker and so therefore needs slightly larger pipes etc - I might even run some veg oil in with some diesel at some point as well but not looking to run 100% veg oil.
__________________
UK spec Mercedes W210 E300 Turbodiesel wagon - OM606.962 with 722.6 transmission - rust free!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 05-11-2015, 03:57 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 4,154
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Stokes View Post
I have the Fass pump on my Dodge - problem solved. The stock Bosch pump is marginal at best. If I knew then what I know now, one of the first things I would have done on the Dodge is to install the Fass pump - not overkill in that application.

BTW - your explanation of the cause of failure on the Cummins is not quite right. The IP fails because they get insufficient fuel and therefore lack proper lubrication - IP cooling really isn't much of an issue according to the folks I spoke with at Fass. Anyhow, it's a GREAT fix and permanent. The installation is a bit of a chore but once done it's DONE.

The use of ULSD has little impact on IP life. I worked with early versions of that fuel and a combination of our testing and lubricity testing at the fuel manufacturers showed that there is still good lubricity in modern Diesel fuels. The longer hydrocarbon chains in Diesel (as compared to gasoline) maintain lubricity without regard to sulfur content. This is one of those urban myths that "everyone knows" but simply isn't accurate. I use on-road Diesel in the race truck when I could just as well pump cheaper non-road fuel into the 5 gallon jug that I fill from. The ULSD burns cleaner and I see no advantage to running dirtier fuel just because I can.

My initial thought is that our Mercedes' don't pass enough fuel to make use of the Fass but if interested you could call those folks - they were very helpful when I called.

Dan
Interesting comment on diesel lubricity. There was one "lubricity study" floating around that purported to find ULSD below the VP's requirements. My chosen fix is to run one of the older AirDogs bought before they started having build problems. I may add a sump because my fuel pick up is too high and draws air at slightly under 1/2 tank. The truck has been reliable now that most of the neglect has been taken care of. There was much more than anticipated.

I haven't needed to pay attention to how much fuel the SD needs. It runs fine in stock form & I haven't gotten around to tweaking.
__________________
85SD 240K & stopped counting painted, putting bac together. 84SD 180,000. sold to a neighbor and member here but I forget his handle. The 84 is much improved from when I had it. 85TD beginning to repair to DD status. Lots of stuff to do.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 05-11-2015, 05:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Wilmington, NC by the Atlantic ocean
Posts: 2,530
When I first brought my truck home (sorry for the Cummins derail here) at 167K miles the truck ran out of fuel at about 1/3 tank - it was towed to my buddy Dave's shop here in town. They dropped the tank and found several issues with the pickup assembly, mostly a failure of a plastic part in the pickup assembly. We bought a MOPAR replacement assembly and purged the tank which had a bunch of what turned out to be algae in it. Since then both Dave and I run an occasional shot of algae killer thru our Diesel trucks (his is a Ford) and so far so good.

Dan
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 05-11-2015, 09:48 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Philly
Posts: 492
For my own selfish curiosity, I say go for it. I'd like to know the results either way.
__________________
Treetops
06 E320 CDI 127K Miles
87 300TD 231K Miles

99 E300 269K Miles-Sold
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 05-11-2015, 10:23 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Middle TN
Posts: 4,154
Do we have any specs and calculations regarding how much fuel is called for? What is the stock fuel pressure and injector flow?
__________________
85SD 240K & stopped counting painted, putting bac together. 84SD 180,000. sold to a neighbor and member here but I forget his handle. The 84 is much improved from when I had it. 85TD beginning to repair to DD status. Lots of stuff to do.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 05-12-2015, 03:03 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 370
Quote:
Originally Posted by Junkman View Post
Do we have any specs and calculations regarding how much fuel is called for? What is the stock fuel pressure and injector flow?
All of these points I am working on, although I know that the injectors should fire at around 135 bar but the stock feed pressure is at around 14psi - its why I would need to look into getting a rising rate regulator if I were to use an electric pump to bring it down from the higher pressure most pumps run at.

I believe there are also upgrades you can do on the pump around raising the internal pump pressure to increase the fill rate of the elements which I might also look into.

Edit: It looks like the overflow valve can be modified to allow for a properly pressurised pump which might also fix the vacuum issue on the intake:

http://www.superturbodiesel.com/std/showthread.php?tid=2774
__________________
UK spec Mercedes W210 E300 Turbodiesel wagon - OM606.962 with 722.6 transmission - rust free!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 05-12-2015, 11:31 AM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 84
I would really like to add an electric pump at the tank to push fuel forwards, and also flow said fuel forward in an appropriate sized fuel line. It seems that if you could feed the stock lift pump around 10-15 PSI that it would certainly help things by significantly reducing the load on the lift pump and could help improve the fill rate at the elements. If going this route, I would also like to add a better filter setup to the equation.

The ideal solution to me would be to simply bypass the entire stock filter and lift pump setup and run an electric pump from the tank, through a "real" diesel filter bank setup (something like 20, 5, and 1 micron filters), and directly into the IP. This, however, creates real complications on the W210 due to the thermostat and Shut Off Valve (I'm sure if you bypass both of these it will throw codes).
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 05-12-2015, 11:49 AM
funola's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NYC
Posts: 8,245
On my 85 300D 617.952, I have on the fuel filter a water clear return to tank sight window. The fuel system is tight and there are no air bubbles when idling. If I rev the engine hard to 3500 rpm from idle, I can see what appears to be bubbles. I always wonder if that is due to the long run of the (restrictive) 8 mm fuel line. It'd be interesting to rig up a USB camera to look at the clear line while driving under high load conditions.
__________________
85 300D turbo pristine w 157k when purchased 161K now
83 300 D turbo 297K runs great. SOLD!
83 240D 4 spd manual- parted out then junked
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 05-12-2015, 09:49 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Philly
Posts: 492
Quote:
Originally Posted by m1tch View Post
Edit: It looks like the overflow valve can be modified to allow for a properly pressurised pump which might also fix the vacuum issue on the intake:

OM606: Fixing the overflow return valve design
Nice find. So where abouts is this banjo bolt in question on the IP? Seems to follow the rule to look at the simple things first, eh?

__________________
Treetops
06 E320 CDI 127K Miles
87 300TD 231K Miles

99 E300 269K Miles-Sold
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:40 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page