Parts Catalog Accessories Catalog How To Articles Tech Forums
Call Pelican Parts at 888-280-7799
Shopping Cart Cart | Project List | Order Status | Help



Go Back   PeachParts Mercedes-Benz Forum > Mercedes-Benz Tech Information and Support > Diesel Discussion

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 04-01-2019, 04:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 35
I 'tightened' up my diesel return fuel lines.....wow!

Hi everybody,

I thought I 'd share the outcome of my latest adventure with dealing with engine shake at idle in my 1983 300D Turbo Diesel.

Of course, we all know the benefits of having a breach-free, non-leaking fuel system in our diesels. Any air aloud into the fuel system will make performance suffer to say the least.

This means no leaks or soft connections of any type on the input side before the lift pump AND on the pressure side after the lift pump.

Keeping hose-clamps on the rubber hoses
tight and the clear fuel lines around the secondary fuel filter leak-free has been discussed and is widely known for the most part.

Here's my discovery and I apologize if this has been discussed before:

I recently changed my return lines that run from each injector in a series and was not too happy about how tight they were.

I know that leaking return lines have a lot to do with how smoothly these engines run at idle so I decided to install small fuel injection hose clamps on each connection to make sure they didn't leak.

All I can say is- wow! What a improvement on not only idle but on throttle response and power. This car that I've owned happily for 11 years (with 363K) has never felt this way. The amount of torque this engine can have, without any other modifications, is making my neck sore.

The improvement in the power-band in each gear is simply awesome. I can now take the Santa Cruz mountains freeway with no kick-down issues due to lack of power. I don't even notice when the turbo kicks in like I did before.

I highly recommend this cheap fix for all return lines on the OM617.95x diesel engines.

I bought a bag of (20) small fuel injection hose clamps on Amazon for about $12 so it's not a risky prospect.

I'd like to know if others have done this to their return lines and what the outcome was if possible.

Just thought I'd share this tid-bit of info. This forum has help me keep this car on the road all these years! Thanks!

Have a great day!

Chris Racine

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 04-01-2019, 05:08 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,814
Interesting... Can you share a picture?

Quote:
Originally Posted by caracine View Post
Hi everybody,

I thought I 'd share the outcome of my latest adventure with dealing with engine shake at idle in my 1983 300D Turbo Diesel.

Of course, we all know the benefits of having a breach-free, non-leaking fuel system in our diesels. Any air aloud into the fuel system will make performance suffer to say the least.

This means no leaks or soft connections of any type on the input side before the lift pump AND on the pressure side after the lift pump.

Keeping hose-clamps on the rubber hoses
tight and the clear fuel lines around the secondary fuel filter leak-free has been discussed and is widely known for the most part.

Here's my discovery and I apologize if this has been discussed before:

I recently changed my return lines that run from each injector in a series and was not too happy about how tight they were.

I know that leaking return lines have a lot to do with how smoothly these engines run at idle so I decided to install small fuel injection hose clamps on each connection to make sure they didn't leak.

All I can say is- wow! What a improvement on not only idle but on throttle response and power. This car that I've owned happily for 11 years (with 363K) has never felt this way. The amount of torque this engine can have, without any other modifications, is making my neck sore.

The improvement in the power-band in each gear is simply awesome. I can now take the Santa Cruz mountains freeway with no kick-down issues due to lack of power. I don't even notice when the turbo kicks in like I did before.

I highly recommend this cheap fix for all return lines on the OM617.95x diesel engines.

I bought a bag of (20) small fuel injection hose clamps on Amazon for about $12 so it's not a risky prospect.

I'd like to know if others have done this to their return lines and what the outcome was if possible.

Just thought I'd share this tid-bit of info. This forum has help me keep this car on the road all these years! Thanks!

Have a great day!

Chris Racine
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 04-01-2019, 06:03 PM
Diseasel300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 6,032
If you used the correct size hose in the first place, no clamps would be required. The return side of the fuel system is only under a couple PSI during operation, clamps are dramatic overkill.
__________________
Current stable:
1995 E320 149K (Nancy)
1983 500SL 120K (SLoL)

Black Sheep:
1985 524TD 167K (TotalDumpster™)

Gone but not forgotten:
1986 300SDL (RIP)
1991 350SD
1991 560SEL
1990 560SEL
1986 500SEL Euro (Rusted to nothing at 47K!)
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 04-01-2019, 06:28 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Alhambra California
Posts: 3,129
It seems like in this case the clamps made a big improvement for a small cost and a small amount of labor.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 04-01-2019, 10:16 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Posts: 321
Thanks for sharing. Question:were the fuel hoses not a tight fit.
Normal fuel injector return hose is 3.2 mm inside,3.5 mm works but is
not as tight,poss leak after a while. So,is this a good fix for us all or worked
because fuel hoses were oversize??
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 04-01-2019, 11:37 PM
Mad Scientist
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,600
I've had great service with 1/8" fuel injection line. 1/8" = 3.175mm

Not "original" but when it's in a swap anyway, I don't worry about it.
__________________
617 swapped Toyota Pickup, 22-24 MPG, 50k miles on swap
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 04-02-2019, 12:50 AM
renaissanceman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Idaho
Posts: 825
If any of you need true 3.2mm nylon braided viton rubber hose, PM me. It's nice stuff. Should solve any air issues without clamps, but I had some flat spring clamps made too. I havent tested them on my Mercedes yet, though.
__________________
RenaissanceMan Labs: where the future is being made today.

Garage:

2017 Chevy Colorado Diesel (nanny state emissions)
2005 Volvo S40 T5 AWD, 77k
1987 Mercedes-Benz 300D turbodiesel, 4 sp auto, 156k - 28.7 mpg
1996 Tracker 4x4, 2 door, 16v, 3 sp auto. 113k - 28.6 mpg

WARNING: this post may contain dangerous free thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 04-02-2019, 07:15 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,234
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWhitmore View Post
It seems like in this case the clamps made a big improvement for a small cost and a small amount of labor.


I skeptical about that. I have 2 times on the Mercedes and 3 times on my Volvo Diesel that uses the same Injector Bodies and return system had return hose leaks and never had it effect the idle on either Engine.

I only knew I had leaks by the smell.

Never seen that to be the case when I worked in a Fuel Injection Shop either.

So for now for me it remains a theory that needs to be supported by info from others.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 04-02-2019, 07:21 PM
Shern's Avatar
Semi-registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,814
That restored power drove him right out of his thread...
__________________
1981 240D 4sp manual. Ivory White.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 04-02-2019, 07:31 PM
renaissanceman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Idaho
Posts: 825
I'm pretty sure return lines have nothing to do with power, air in the system, etc.

On the other hand, air in your return lines can indicate air ingress elsewhere in the system.
__________________
RenaissanceMan Labs: where the future is being made today.

Garage:

2017 Chevy Colorado Diesel (nanny state emissions)
2005 Volvo S40 T5 AWD, 77k
1987 Mercedes-Benz 300D turbodiesel, 4 sp auto, 156k - 28.7 mpg
1996 Tracker 4x4, 2 door, 16v, 3 sp auto. 113k - 28.6 mpg

WARNING: this post may contain dangerous free thinking.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 04-02-2019, 08:17 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Posts: 5,924
Unless someone can explain what occurred. I have to wonder if elimination of the leaking allowed more pressure to develop on the backside of the relief valve. Present by gravity normally plus a slight buildup with system flow. I would have to look if a bad secondary fuel filter may be involved.


Over the years I remember some complaints when the hoses where leaky. Yet never a signifigant power loss. Unless I missed it. I slightly remember some concerns as a source of air causing issues was suspect. This I can see at idle.


In general I felt most hoses where replaced rather than waste fuel.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 04-02-2019, 08:40 PM
Graham's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by barry12345 View Post
Over the years I remember some complaints when the hoses where leaky. Yet never a signifigant power loss. Unless I missed it. I slightly remember some concerns as a source of air causing issues was suspect. This I can see at idle.

In general I felt most hoses where replaced rather than waste fuel.
I recall there being starting problems on some diesels when return lines were leaking. Never understood why but the truck owners did have a theory (likely air related)

On w123, I bought the proper OE hose and they don't leak. Had to make a new plug for the end that fitted properly.

I have bought those small clamps off Amazon and used them on the return line on a marine diesel. But it had different size hose.

By the way, OP also posted on Benzworld-Diesel. Someone from AutopartsArizona posted something that just made the OP look stupid. Seems to me, not smart for company to do that to potential customers!
__________________
Graham
85 300D,72 350SL, 98 E320, Outback 2.5
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 04-02-2019, 09:53 PM
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: NE Oklahoma
Posts: 566
The original post was an April Fools joke, right?
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 04-02-2019, 11:55 PM
Diesel911's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Long Beach,CA
Posts: 51,234
It is easy enough to pull of one of your return hoses and go for a short drive and see if it effects anything.
__________________
84 300D, 82 Volvo 244Gl Diesel
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 04-03-2019, 12:11 AM
Diseasel300's Avatar
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 6,032
Quote:
Originally Posted by MB140300SD View Post
The original post was an April Fools joke, right?
That's what my thinking is.

__________________
Current stable:
1995 E320 149K (Nancy)
1983 500SL 120K (SLoL)

Black Sheep:
1985 524TD 167K (TotalDumpster™)

Gone but not forgotten:
1986 300SDL (RIP)
1991 350SD
1991 560SEL
1990 560SEL
1986 500SEL Euro (Rusted to nothing at 47K!)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On




All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:15 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0
Copyright 2024 Pelican Parts, LLC - Posts may be archived for display on the Peach Parts or Pelican Parts Website -    DMCA Registered Agent Contact Page